Evaluation of Micropore"s SpiraLith Absorbents
Evaluation of Micropore's SpiraLith TM Absorbents Into Anesthesia Breathing Circuits
1 other identifier
observational
186
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is an observational study investigating the duration of use and cost of the new CO2 absorbent Micropore's Spiralith®, compared to Drägersorb® 800+, Drägersorb® Free.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 8, 2022
CompletedApril 8, 2022
February 1, 2022
1.3 years
September 3, 2015
January 13, 2021
February 10, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of Use Under Clinical Anesthesia of Each Absorbent
Average lifespan of Spiralith® (minutes), Drägersorb® 800 Plus (minutes), Drägersorb® Free (minutes)
Assesed for the duration of each absorbent's use, up to 5 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Cost of Each Absorbent's Use
Assesed for the duration of each absorbent's use, up to 5 days
Study Arms (3)
Randomized to Micropore SpiraLith
lithium hydroxide was studied for use in anesthesia as a possible replacement for calcium absorbents. This agent has been used for CO2 absorption in the military and in aerospace for over 50 years due to its high capacity and efficiency in the removal of CO2. It was however not considered usable by the medical industry due to concerns with its granular form. It has now been demonstrated that LiOH does not interact with commonly used inhalation anesthetic agents and appears to have higher CO2 removal capability.7,8
Randomized to Drager 800 Absorbent
Calcium hydroxide lime is one of the newer clinically available carbon dioxide absorbents and probably considered the current standard of care. It is mainly composed of calcium hydroxide and calcium chloride and contains two setting agents: calcium sulfate and polyvinylpyrrolidine which contribute to the increased hardness and porosity of this absorbent. The most significant advantage of calcium hydroxide lime over other agents is that it is produced without sodium and potassium hydroxide which are strong bases.
Randomized to Drager Free
Calcium hydroxide lime is one of the newer clinically available carbon dioxide absorbents and probably considered the current standard of care. It is mainly composed of calcium hydroxide and calcium chloride and contains two setting agents: calcium sulfate and polyvinylpyrrolidine which contribute to the increased hardness and porosity of this absorbent. The most significant advantage of calcium hydroxide lime over other agents is that it is produced without sodium and potassium hydroxide which are strong bases.
Interventions
Calcium hydroxide lime is one of the newer clinically available carbon dioxide absorbents and probably considered the current standard of care. It is mainly composed of calcium hydroxide and calcium chloride and contains two setting agents: calcium sulfate and polyvinylpyrrolidine which contribute to the increased hardness and porosity of this absorbent. The most significant advantage of calcium hydroxide lime over other agents is that it is produced without sodium and potassium hydroxide which are strong bases.
lithium hydroxide was studied for use in anesthesia as a possible replacement for calcium absorbents. This agent has been used for CO2 absorption in the military and in aerospace for over 50 years due to its high capacity and efficiency in the removal of CO2. It was however not considered usable by the medical industry due to concerns with its granular form. It has now been demonstrated that LiOH does not interact with commonly used inhalation anesthetic agents and appears to have higher CO2 removal capability.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients scheduled for surgery in the selected OR Rooms
You may qualify if:
- All comers to the 3 designated Operating Rooms.
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital
Newark, New Jersey, 07103, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Eloy, PI
- Organization
- Rutgers - New Jersey Medical School
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
J.Daniel Eloy, MD
Rutgers University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthsiology, NJMS
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2015
First Posted
September 15, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 8, 2022
Results First Posted
April 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02