Navigation With X3 vs Non-Navigation With X3 Study
Comparison X3 Study Between Navi-THA and Non-navi-THA
1 other identifier
interventional
49
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of the large head in THA with a navigation system and without a navigation system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2017
CompletedOctober 29, 2018
September 1, 2018
2 years
August 10, 2015
October 25, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Range of motion (ROM) during surgery
intraoperative
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Measuring accuracy of the ROM during surgery
Intraoperative
implantation accuracy
Intraoperative
Postoperative dislocation
From intraoperative to 1yr
Study Arms (2)
With Navigation system
OTHERLarge diameter head with Trident X3 insert with Navigation system
Without Navigation system
OTHERLarge diameter head with Trident X3 insert with conventional instrumentation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient who is a candidate for a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with cementless acetabular and femoral components.
- Patient who has a diagnosis of degenerative joint disease and no bacterial infectious disease.
- Patient who is age 20 or over.
- Patient who signed an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, study specific Informed Patient Consent Form.
- Patient who is willing to and able to comply with postoperative scheduled evaluations.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient who has a bacterial infectious disease or has a high risk of a bacterial infection.
- Patient who requires revision surgery of a previously implanted total hip arthroplasty.
- Patient who is morbidly obese, defined as having a Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 45.
- Patient who is or may be pregnant female.
- Patient who has neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which limits ability to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device.
- Patient with diagnosed systemic disease (i.e. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy).
- Patient who is immunologically suppressed or receiving chronic steroids.
- Patient who is judged ineligible with specific reason by primary doctor.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Osaka Rosai Hospital
Osaka, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yasuyuki Inatsugu
Stryker Japan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2015
First Posted
September 7, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 31, 2017
Study Completion
July 31, 2017
Last Updated
October 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09