The PAtient-Centred Team - Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness Study
PACT
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Teamwork in Medical Emergencies: The PAtient-Centred Team (PACT) Service Model. Effect and Cost Effectiveness Evaluation
1 other identifier
interventional
1,200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is an urgent need to develop new care models for patients with long-term and complex needs. Our goal is services that are seamless, pro-active and person-oriented. Intervention: The Patient-centered health care team (PACT) is a service model for frail elderly patients with multiple long term conditions. PACT is a seamless and proactive health service model that aims to ensure safe early discharge and prevent hospital admissions for elderly frail patients. The four pivotal elements are are supported by theoretical and empirical underpinnings: 1) Goal-oriented person centered approach 2) Inter-disciplinary comprehensive geriatric team: 3) Pro-active care plan. Study Objective: 1\) To investigate whether the PACT model improves health-related quality of life and patient generated goals 2) carry out a health economic evaluation of PACT. Design: The evaluation model for complex interventions is our guiding evaluation framework. This is a non-randomized, matched control, before after study. The intervention unit, is the care organization, including four hospitals - municipality dyads. Two intervention dyads and two control dyads. Index patients from intervention hospitals will be matched age, sex and number of chronic conditions. Intervention group: Patients with emergency admission to the UNN internal medicine department in Tromsø and Harstad who are age \> 65, have three or more long-term conditions, an emergency admission within the last year, and an informed consent is given by patient or next of kin. (Approved by ethics board 07.05.2015). The exclusion criteria are: Language barriers, and less than 3 months life expectancy. Controls: Recruited from the Nordlanssykehuset (Bodø) and UNN-Narvik internal medicine departments, matched to the index patient's sex, age, number of long-term conditions. Control patients will be subject to the same data-collection as intervention patients. Data collections: All patient data will be collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Outcomes: The primary outcome is the adjusted differences in the change of Quality of Life, measured by Short Form-36 (SF-36), physical health dimension between intervention and control groups at 6 months after inclusion in study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedMay 17, 2018
May 1, 2018
2.4 years
August 18, 2015
May 11, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
SF-12, physical dimension
The primary outcome is the adjusted differences in the change of Quality of Life, measured by SF-12, physical health dimension between intervention and control groups at 6 months after inclusion in study.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Rates of emergency admission days in hospital
6 months
Rates of consultations with General Practitioner outside of hours
6 months
Rates of emergency consultations in secondary outpatient clinics
6 months
The patient generated index (PGI), open version
6 months
SF-12
3 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Integrated care
OTHERAll patients fitting inclusion criteria will receive care from The Patient -centered health care team ( PACT ) which is a service model for frail elderly patients with multiple long term conditions.
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONAll patients in the Control hospitals (Bodø and Narvik) that match the index patient from the intervention group, and who consents to participate in the study. Eligible patients receive an invitation to participate from the local study nurse. Included controls receive usual care in control hospital and municipalities. Data collection in intervention and control groups are the same.
Interventions
The PACT model facilitates better care by : 1) a structured person centered needs assessment , 2) individual care plans , and 3) and an inter- professional team that coordinates services across specialties and levels of care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who either received treatment in PACT team for \> 24 hours (Treat group) or an emergency admission to the UNN (Control group) in Tromsø/ Harstad/ Narvik/ Bodø. Age \> 60. Have complex long-term needs.
You may not qualify if:
- Live outside of designated municipalities. Receive \< 24 hours of care from PACT team.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Üniversity hospital North Norway
Tromsø, Troms, 9037, Norway
Related Publications (2)
Berntsen GKR, Dalbakk M, Hurley JS, Bergmo T, Solbakken B, Spansvoll L, Bellika JG, Skrovseth SO, Brattland T, Rumpsfeld M. Person-centred, integrated and pro-active care for multi-morbid elderly with advanced care needs: a propensity score-matched controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 3;19(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4397-2.
PMID: 31581947DERIVEDBergmo TS, Berntsen GK, Dalbakk M, Rumpsfeld M. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the PAtient-Centred Team (PACT) model: study protocol of a prospective matched control before-and-after study. BMC Geriatr. 2015 Oct 23;15:133. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0133-x.
PMID: 26499256DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gro K Berntsen, MD, Dr Med
NST
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This is a registry based study design. The Primary outcome is extracted from routine data recorded by clinical and administrative personell who are unaware of study allocation in the electronic health care record. The questionnaire outcome data can not be masked as the patient and study personell will be aware of treatment allocation group. To avoid preferential recording of these outcomes, study personell assist in data collection in either treatment or control groups - never both, so that they could not compare or favor one group above the other.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2015
First Posted
September 4, 2015
Study Start
August 15, 2016
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
May 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Due to data privacy legislation regarding sensitive data in Norway we are not at liberty to share original data.