Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation as a Symptomatic Treatment for Advanced Parkinson's Disease
SpinalPark
1 other identifier
interventional
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Following the so call "honey moon" period, motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease (PD) become difficult to control with dopaminergic treatments alone. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus and internal globus pallidus helps to treat fluctuating parkinsonian patients restoring a decent quality of life. However, DBS need a long, complex and invasive surgery to succeed. Thus, there is a critical need to develop alternative treatments, more accessible and less invasive. Thoracic posterior spinal cord stimulation has been used for decades to treat chronic neuropathic pains. Safety and efficacy have already been demonstrated in neuropathic pain. Experimentally, SCS has also demonstrated to improve locomotor activity in two different rodents' models of parkinson's disease. The purpose of this study is to determine whether thoracic SCS is safe and could induce a benefit motor parkinsonian symptoms without any impact on cognitive function and axial disability.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Jun 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedAugust 2, 2016
July 1, 2016
1.6 years
July 27, 2015
July 31, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of severe adverse events and adverse events reported
at week 30
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Tolerance and global statement
After surgery (DO), at week 4, 8, 13, 18 and 30
Difference of UPDRS-III scores with and without stimulation in ON or OFF medication state
At W4, W9, W14,W30
Difference of UPDRS-III scores without stimulation and after 4 weeks of continuous stimulation in ON or OFF medication state
At W4, W8, W9, W13, W14,W18
Difference of global UPDRS between screening and others visits, in OFF and ON medication state
At W-4, W8, W13, W18,W30
Difference of Walking Time Measurement scores with and without stimulation in ON or OFF medication state
At W4, W9, W14,W30
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Spinal Cord Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
3 frequencies of SCS are tested for each patient : 50, 100 and 130 Hz
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient from 45 to 69 years old
- Affiliated to the French social health care system
- Menopausal or under contraception for women
- Parkinson's disease according to UK PDSBB's criteria with diagnosis for ≥ 5 years
- OFF UPDRS-III ≥ 25
- Acute dopa-response ≥ 50% for UPDRS-III in an L-Dopa challenge
- Fluctuations with periods off ≥ 25% of the time of awakening or dyskinesia ≥ 25%
- ≤ Hoehn \& Yahr ≤ 4
- No change in anti-parkinsonian drugs in the last month
- Informed consent signed for the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients major protected
- Pregnancy
- Deep brain stimulation or other neurosurgical treatment
- MDRS Score \< 130 or depression scale MADRS ≥ 20
- Respiratory insufficiency (surgery belly decubitus)
- Abnormalities on brain MRI which evoke a secondary parkinsonian syndrome
- Spinal cord's injury on MRI or posterior cordonal's pathology on sensitive evoked potential
- Neuropathy on EMG
- Prior spinal surgery and spinal pathology at the dorsal level
- Patients having already been included in therapeutic studies
- Patient with a cardiac pacemaker, a defibrillator or any other implanted active pacemaker
- Patient requiring diathermy process
- Patient having a pathology requiring an MRI follow-up care
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Henri Mondor Hospital
Créteil, 94010, France
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claire Thiriez, MD
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2015
First Posted
September 3, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 2, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07