Study Stopped
This study was withdrawn on November 2017 due to no subject accrual. No subjects were enrolled in this study.
A Study of Transcorporal Versus Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement
A Randomized Study of Transcorporal Versus Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We propose a randomized non-blinded comparison of standard vs. transcorporal approach for placement of an artificial urinary sphincter in male patients with stress urinary incontinence after radiation and radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. In the United States, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), manufactured by American Medical Systems, is the gold standard surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men. The cuff, which is the portion of the device that encircles and occludes the urethra, is typically placed directly around the urethra (i.e., "standard" placement). The cuff can erode into the urethra. Transcorporal placement has been introduced as a method to reduce the risk of erosion. Transcorporal placement involves tunneling the cuff through the erectile bodies so as to protect the dorsal aspect of the urethra. This approach has never been compared to standard placement in a randomized fashion. In our randomized trial, no additional procedures beyond the normal care protocol will be required of the patients. We will conduct the study through our established, IRB-approved multi-institutional network of surgeons. Success will be assessed via objective and subjective methods; complications will be tallied in a standardized fashion. Outcomes will be measured at two years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedJuly 22, 2019
July 1, 2019
2.2 years
August 12, 2015
July 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
AUS Removal/Revision
We will record the incidence of any repeat AUS surgery for mechanical failure, cuff erosion, impending erosion (discretion of surgeon), urethral atrophy, urinary incontinence and persistent retention due to small cuff.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Urinary Retention
8 weeks
Incontinence
3 months
Incontinence Quality of Life
3 months
Sexual Function
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Transcorporal AUS
EXPERIMENTALThe artificial urinary sphincter is placed through the tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosa in order to theoretically provide a protective backing on the urethra.
Standard AUS
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe artificial urinary sphincter is placed in the standard fashion.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men undergoing an AUS procedure
- History of pelvic radiation for prostate or other cancer
- No spontaneous erections and no erections with oral erectogenic agents
- Subjects able to consent for themselves
You may not qualify if:
- prior urethroplasty
- prior urethral erosion of AUS
- history of penile prosthesis placement or explantation
- concomitant placement of penile prosthesis at the time of AUS placement
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Minnesotalead
- Baylor College of Medicinecollaborator
- University of Iowacollaborator
- University of Kansascollaborator
- Loyola University Chicagocollaborator
- Lahey Cliniccollaborator
- University of California, San Franciscocollaborator
- University of Washingtoncollaborator
- New York Universitycollaborator
- University of California, San Diegocollaborator
- University of Utahcollaborator
- Ohio State Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Related Publications (5)
Aaronson DS, Elliott SP, McAninch JW. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter placement for incontinence in high-risk patients after treatment of prostate cancer. Urology. 2008 Oct;72(4):825-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.06.065. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
PMID: 18752838BACKGROUNDDalkin BL, Wessells H, Cui H. A national survey of urinary and health related quality of life outcomes in men with an artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):237-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64076-1.
PMID: 12478144BACKGROUNDGuralnick ML, Miller E, Toh KL, Webster GD. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079.
PMID: 11956443BACKGROUNDHaab F, Trockman BA, Zimmern PE, Leach GE. Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup. J Urol. 1997 Aug;158(2):435-9.
PMID: 9224318BACKGROUNDSimhan J, Morey AF, Zhao LC, Tausch TJ, Scott JF, Hudak SJ, Mazzarella BC. Decreasing need for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery by precise cuff sizing in men with spongiosal atrophy. J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):798-803. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.115. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
PMID: 24746880BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sean Elliott, MD
University of Minnesota
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2015
First Posted
August 14, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
July 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07