Wellbeing in Pregnancy: Evaluating an Intervention to Improve Women's Emotional Wellbeing in Pregnancy
WiP
1 other identifier
interventional
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Wellbeing in Pregnancy (WiP) project is an online pilot randomized controlled trial which aims to evaluate an intervention to improve women's emotional wellbeing in pregnancy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 4, 2016
August 1, 2015
3 months
July 29, 2015
March 3, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in knowledge and beliefs about perinatal mental health from baseline at 1 month
Knowledge and beliefs about perinatal mental health will be measured using a 12-item self-report questionnaire scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = Strongly agree to 5 = Strongly disagree. It has been developed in consultation with the research team and with a parental advisory group. It will explore women's knowledge and beliefs about perinatal mental health problems, including perceived stigma, incidence of psychological distress in the perinatal period, as well as knowledge and beliefs regarding sources of potential support for women.
Baseline to 1 month
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Changes in mood from baseline at 1 month
Baseline to 1 month
Changes in mood from baseline at 6 weeks postpartum
Baseline to 6 weeks postpartum
Changes in general psychological health from baseline at 1 month
Baseline to 1 month
Changes in general psychological health from baseline at 6 weeks postpartum
Baseline to 6 weeks postpartum
Changes in depressive symptoms from baseline at 1 month
Baseline to 1 month
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALWellbeing Plan
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl task. Information about physical health in pregnancy, matched for readability (Flesch score) and length/duration with the Wellbeing Plan
Interventions
The Wellbeing Plan is a short self-help leaflet designed to improve emotional wellbeing of women during and after pregnancy by providing information, raising awareness, helping a woman identify her own symptoms, provide coping strategies, and identify key people who can support the woman during this time.
Information about physical health in pregnancy, matched for readability (Flesch score) and length/duration with the Wellbeing Plan
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- weeks pregnant
- Sufficient proficiency in English to understand and complete the Wellbeing Plan
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- City, University of Londonlead
- Boots Family Trustcollaborator
- Tommy'scollaborator
- Netmumscollaborator
- Institute of Health Visitingcollaborator
- Royal College of Midwivescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
City University London
London, London, EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom
Related Publications (14)
Barkham M, Bewick B, Mullin T, Gilbody S, Connell J, Cahill J, ... & Evans C. The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 13(1): 3-13, 2013. doi: 10.1080/14733145.2012.729069
BACKGROUNDBoots Family Trust Alliance. Perinatal Mental Health Experiences of Women and Health Professionals, 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.tommys.org/file/Perinatal_Mental_Health_2013.pdf
BACKGROUNDBoyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage; 1998.
BACKGROUNDConnell J, & Barkham M. CORE-10 User Manual, Version 1.1. CORE System Trust & CORE Information Management Systems Ltd, 1-40, 2007.
BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Monahan PO, Lowe B. Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 6;146(5):317-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004.
PMID: 17339617BACKGROUNDLeadsom A, Field F, Burstow P & Lucas C. The 1001 Critical Days: The Importance of the Conception to Age Two Period, 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.andrealeadsom.com/downloads/1001cdmanifesto.pdf
BACKGROUNDMaternal Mental Health Alliance. The Costs of Perinatal Mental Health Problems. London: Centre for Mental Health, 2014.
BACKGROUNDMatthews G, Jones DM, & Chamberlain AG. Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist. British Journal of Psychology 81: 17-42, 1990.
BACKGROUNDNICE. Guideline CG192: Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health: clinical management and service guidance, 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg192/chapter/1-recommendations#recognising-mental-health-problems-in-pregnancy-and-the-postnatal-period-and-referral-2
BACKGROUNDNSPCC. Prevention in Mind. All Babies Count: Spotlight on Perinatal Mental Health, 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.nspcc.org.uk/globalassets/documents/research-reports/all-babies-count-spotlight-perinatal-mental-health.pdf
BACKGROUNDOffice for National Statistics. Statistical Bulletin: Births and deaths in England and Wales 2011. Newport: Office for National Statistics, 2012.
BACKGROUNDO'Hara MW, & Swain AM. Rates and risk of postpartum depression - a meta-analysis. International review of psychiatry 8(1): 37-54, 1996.
BACKGROUNDRobertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart DE. Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 Jul-Aug;26(4):289-95. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.02.006.
PMID: 15234824BACKGROUNDWebster J, Linnane JW, Dibley LM, Hinson JK, Starrenburg SE, Roberts JA. Measuring social support in pregnancy: can it be simple and meaningful? Birth. 2000 Jun;27(2):97-101. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00097.x.
PMID: 11251486BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan Ayers, PhD
City, University of London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2015
First Posted
August 14, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 4, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-08