NCT03950388

Brief Summary

The Care Quality Commission (2017) concludes that too often care for people with severe mental health problems on mental health inpatient wards institutionalises people, rather than helping them to have an independent life in the community. There is good evidence that psychological interventions improve patient well-being and independent living, but patients on acute mental health wards often do not have access to evidence-based psychological therapies which are strongly advised by NICE guidance for severe mental health problems (e.g. NICE, 2011). The overall aim of this programme of work is to increase patient access to psychological therapies on acute mental health inpatient wards. Stage one of the programme aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to delivering therapy in these settings through a large qualitative study. The key output of stage one was an intervention protocol that is designed to be delivered on acute wards to increase patient access to psychologically-informed care and therapy. Stage two of the programme aims to test the effects of the intervention on patient wellbeing and serious incidents on the ward which are routinely collated by wards and patient and staff contact is not required (primary outcomes), patient social functioning and symptoms, staff burnout, ward atmosphere from staff and patient perspectives and cost effectiveness of the intervention (secondary outcomes). The study is a single blind, pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial and will recruit thirty-four wards across England that will be randomised to receive the new intervention plus treatment as usual, or treatment as usual only. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 6-month and 9-month follow-ups, with serious incidents on the ward collected at an additional 3-month follow-up. A process evaluation will be nested within the trial to understand factors that influence the effects of the intervention and implementation in real world settings.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 18, 2019

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 21, 2019

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 29, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

April 18, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 27, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient wellbeing

    Patient well being using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Questionnaire. WEMWBS: Scale: 1= None of the time, 2 = Rarely, 3 = Some of the time, 4 = Often, 5 = All of the time. Participants are asked to select an option considering the statement over the past 2 weeks. WEMWBS is a 14 item scale with 5 response categories, summed to provide a single score ranging from 14-70. The items are all worded positively and cover both feeling and functioning aspects of mental wellbeing, thereby making the concept more accessible.

    Baseline, 6 months and 9 months

  • Serious incidents on ward

    Report taken from each Trust about the number of different serious incidents reported on a ward across a 3 month time period. Serious Incidents: Taken from current reports pulled by each trust to monitor the number of incidents which occur within a ward. Categorised by each Trust using a levelling system of 1-5 with 5 being the most serious level. The incidents are also categorised by event type which varies at each Trust and again is the responsibility of each data entry personnel to assign a category. Data to be taken at baseline for the 3 months prior, at 3 months for the 3 months prior, at 6 months for the 3 months prior and at 9 months for the 3 months prior

    Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Whether the intervention improves patients' symptoms

    Baseline, 6 months and 9 months

  • Whether the intervention improves staff perceptions of ward atmosphere.

    6 months

  • Whether the intervention improves patient perceptions of ward atmosphere.

    6 months

  • Whether the intervention reduces staff burnout.

    Baseline, 6 months and 9 months

  • Cost-effectiveness of the psychological service model using health economic measures.

    Baseline, 6 months and 9 months

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Treatment as Usual

NO INTERVENTION

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Intervention

Interventions

InterventionBEHAVIORAL

Wards randomly assigned to receive the intervention will have a Band 8a Psychologist based on the ward for 0.5FTE for 7 months. During this time, all patients will be involved with the proposed stepped model of care intervention at one of three levels. The level the patient receives will be decided by the multidisciplinary ward team. At Step one, all patients will have a psychological formulation developed by the psychologist in conjunction with the patient or members of the ward team. At Step 2, all qualified nurses will be trained and supervised to deliver guided self-help material of psychological interventions targeting key problem areas for patients. At Step 3, patients will be offered up to 16, one-to-one therapy sessions with the psychologist.

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age17 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ward:
  • \) Generic, working-age, adult acute mental health wards.
  • Staff (RCT Outcome Measures):
  • Consent to complete self-report measures.
  • Based on the ward for at least 75% of their working week.
  • Patient (RCT Outcome Measures):
  • Capacity to consent to complete the self-report measures
  • Sufficient levels of concentration to complete the required battery of self-report measures with breaks if needed. This will be determined by the researcher when meeting the participant and in collaboration with the clinical team.
  • Sufficient English language proficiency to take part in qualitative interviews or agreement to the use of an interpreter. This will be determined by the researcher when meeting the participant and in collaboration with the clinical team.
  • Staff (Semi-structured interviews):
  • Consent to have interviews digitally audio recorded.
  • Direct experience of working with patients with severe mental health problems on an acute inpatient ward that has taken part in the RCT.
  • Patients (Semi-structured interviews):
  • Capacity to provide informed consent for interviews.
  • Consent to have interviews recorded.
  • +2 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Ward:
  • Wards that have a specialist function, such as older people, intensive care or rehabilitation.
  • Wards that already have more than 1 session of dedicated psychological therapy input per week. This is because we need to ensure treatment as usual does not include significant elements of the intervention we are aiming to test.
  • Staff (RCT Outcome Measures):
  • Non-permanent staff, such as bank or agency workers.
  • Staff who are planning to leave the ward before the intervention period starts.
  • Patient (RCT Outcome Measures):
  • Patients whose discharge is planned for before the start of the intervention period.
  • Unable to complete self-report measures due to difficulties with concentration or high levels of distress. This will be determined by the researcher when meeting the participant and in collaboration with the clinical team.
  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
  • Staff (Semi-structured interviews):
  • Non-permanent staff, such as bank or agency workers.
  • Working on the ward for less than 2 weeks at the time of the interview.
  • Unwilling to consent to having interviews audio recorded.
  • Patient (Semi-structured interviews):
  • +5 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Leed & York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Leeds, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (2)

  • Johnston I, Edge D, Wilson P, Beinaraviciute A, Bucci S, Drake R, Gilworth G, Haddock G, Handerer F, Kaur S, Lovell K, Morley H, Price O, Samji M, Berry K. Increasing access to psychological therapy on acute mental health wards: staff and patient experiences of a stepped psychological intervention. BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06721-7.

  • Berry K, Raphael J, Wilson H, Bucci S, Drake RJ, Edge D, Emsley R, Gilworth G, Lovell K, Odebiyi B, Price O, Sutton M, Winter R, Haddock G. A cluster randomised controlled trial of a ward-based intervention to improve access to psychologically-informed care and psychological therapy for mental health in-patients. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 3;22(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03696-7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychological Well-Being

Interventions

Methods

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Personal SatisfactionBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Lecturer in Clinical Psychology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2019

First Posted

May 15, 2019

Study Start

October 21, 2019

Primary Completion

June 1, 2022

Study Completion

June 1, 2022

Last Updated

September 29, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Locations