Skin Ulcers Treatment With an Handicraft Topical Device
Effectiveness of Topical Negative Handicraft Device for Versus Traditional Conservative Treatment in Skin Ulcers Management in Lower Limb
1 other identifier
interventional
144
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a handicraft topical device of negative pressure versus traditional healing treatment for skin ulcers in lower limbs; in patients with diabetes mellitus, venous stasis and arterial insufficiency.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Mar 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2015
CompletedJuly 30, 2015
February 1, 2014
7 months
March 12, 2015
July 29, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Presence of granulation tissue in skin ulcers.
Presence of granulation tissue in 50% of the wound
10 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Leukocyte less than 11,000 mm3.
10 days
Temperature
10 days
Breathing Rate
10 days
Heart Rate
10 days
Study Arms (2)
drenovac handcrafted
EXPERIMENTALPatients treatment with the handicraft topical device negative pressure therapy Economic craft
Healing
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who were managed with traditional "conservative treatment".
Interventions
under local anesthesia, sepsis and antisepsis, place sterile field, prepared area go out all devitalized or necrotic tissue using liquid soap surgical and irrigation back saline 0.9%. We introduce a device to distribute the negative pressure or vacuum on ulcer; conducted margins make recommendations 5-12 mm over the edge of the wound, applying negative pressure or vacuum retracted sponges, likewise for the spare fewer gauze was placed Sterile adhesive film covering the defect to seal the system cover adequately the probe output nelaton not to submit drain the system. Connect the probe to the sterile nelaton this hose and a suction system with pressure gauge, pressure -80-125 mmHg. Change it every 72 hours.
Were handled as follows: 1. Under local anesthesia, prior asepsis and antisepsis of the skin ulcer with iodinepovidone sterile fields are placed, we proceeded to debridement of all necrotic tissue or devitalized then a cure with liquid soap surgery was performed and was irrigated with 1000 cc of solution physiological 0.9%, and finally the ulcer was covered with sterile gauze. 2. healing of skin ulcers were performed every 24 hours. 3. the evolution of skin ulcers was evaluated every 3 days, requesting a differential valuing of clinical and biochemical form the aforementioned variables.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with cutaneous leg ulcers due to diabetes mellitus, venous stasis and arterial insufficiency requiring healing or tissue debrided sent to managing their disease to regional general hospital No. 17, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Benito Juárez, Quintana Roo.
- Patients of both sexes.
- Patients over 18 years.
- Patients that have basic laboratory at admission (complete blood count with differential).
- Patients with comorbidities associated as Diabetes Mellitus , Hypertension, stroke, heart disease, nephropathy, venous insufficiency and arterial insufficiency, etc.
You may not qualify if:
- Hemodynamically unstable patients.
- Patients with septic shock from any source.
- Patients with deep skin ulcers with exposed some organ, data osteomyelitis, vascular-nervous exposure.
- Patients with secondary cutaneous ulcer enteral fistula.
- Patients with cutaneous ulcer or cancer tumors.
- Patients with cutaneous ulcer with active bleeding.
- Patients with cutaneous ulcer necrosis.
- Patients with cutaneous ulcer leishmania, insect bite.
- Patients with cutaneous ulcer burns.
- Patients who do not accept their participation in the study through informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Gonzalez IG, Angel MA, Baez MV, Ruiz Flores B, de Los Angeles Martinez Ferretiz M, Woolf SV, Lopez I, Sandoval-Jurado L, Pat-Espadas FG, Cruz AA, Delgado AT. Handcrafted Vacuum-Assisted Device for Skin Ulcers Treatment Versus Traditional Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trial. World J Surg. 2017 Feb;41(2):386-393. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3782-9.
PMID: 27822727DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fany Guadalupe Pat Espadas, MCs
IMSS
- STUDY CHAIR
Israel Augusto González González, Dr.
IMSS
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Luis Sandoval Jurado, PhD
IMSS
- STUDY CHAIR
Ma. Valeria Jiménez Baéz, PhD
IMSS
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2015
First Posted
July 30, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 30, 2015
Record last verified: 2014-02