Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Tolerance and Acceptability of URGO Dressing vs a Hydrofibre in the Local Management of Venous or Predominantly Venous Mixed Leg Ulcers.
Evaluation Of The Efficacy, Tolerance And Acceptability Of URGO Dressing 310 3082 Versus A Hydrofibre Dressing In The Local Management Of Venous Or Predominantly Venous Mixed Leg Ulcers
1 other identifier
interventional
159
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of this trial is to demonstrate that a local care strategy using URGO 310 3082 dressing is not inferior to a reference therapeutic strategy using a hydrofibre dressing in the management of venous ulcers. This non-inferiority hypothesis will be judged on the planimetric relative regression of the wound surface area after six weeks of treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedMarch 29, 2013
March 1, 2013
1.7 years
October 3, 2011
March 28, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The efficacy of dressings under trial will be judged on the evolution of wound surface area after six weeks of treatment.
The main evaluation criterion is the relative planimetric regression of the wound surface area, calculated according to the following formula, from centralised planimetric measurements: Regression of the area (%) = \[(ST0-STlast)/ST0\] x 100 ST0: Surface area of the lesion measured on the day of inclusion STlast: Surface area of the lesion at the last planimetric evaluation available
Week 1, 2, 4 and 6
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Comparison between the two devices of percentage of lesions in which the evolution is positive (defined by a relative regression at least 40% of wound surface) after monitoring for 6 weeks.
Week 1, 2, 4 and 6
Comparison between the two groups of percentage of debrided lesions (defined by a lesion with more than 70% of its surface covered by granulation tissue of a "red colour" on the colorimetric scale), at the last available evaluation
Week 1, 2, 4 and 6
Comparison between the two strategies of percentage of patients in whom at least one problem of pain was detected during care (VAS score at the end of care > 30 mm)
Week 1, 2, 4 and 6
Comparison between the 2 groups of the percentage of wound care associated with manual debridement
Week 1, 2, 4 and 6
Comparison between the two groups of the evolution of the patients' quality of life between inclusion and the last available visit. This quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol-5Dâ„¢ questionnaire
Week 1, 2, 4 and 6
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
URGO 310 3082
EXPERIMENTALAquacel
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
the dressing should be changed on average every 1 to 2 days, then as often as required (up to 7 days) depending on the exudate volume and the clinical condition of the wound (evaluated by the investigating doctor).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient over 18 years old who has provided his/her written informed consent
- Patient who can be monitored by the same investigation team throughout the duration of the study
- Patient who agrees to wear effective venous compression every day, associated with the trial dressing
- Leg ulcer with a distal Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) not less than 0.7 and not more than 1.3
- Ulcer with a minimum area of 3 cm2 and a maximum area of 30 cm2
- Ulcer duration between 3 and 36 months
- Ulcer where the surface area is 70% or more covered by fibrinous tissue
- Ulcer at least 3 cm away from any other lesion
- Ulcer moderately or strongly exudative justifying the use of an absorbent dressing
You may not qualify if:
- Female patient of child-bearing potential who has no effective means of contraception
- Patient who is pregnant or breastfeeding
- Patient taking part in another therapeutic trial
- Patient with hypersensitivity to one of the components of the trial dressing or a known allergy to carboxymethylcellulose (hydrocolloid)
- Patient with a serious general pathological condition who, it may be feared, might discontinue participation in the trial before the six weeks of treatment
- Patient with an evolving neoplastic condition, treated by radiotherapy, chemotherapy or hormone therapy
- Patient with a systemic infection not controlled by suitable antibiotic treatment
- Ulcer where its surface is totally or partially covered by black necrotic plaque
- Ulcer which is clinically infected
- Malignant ulcer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hopital Rothschild
Paris, 75012, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2011
First Posted
October 10, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 29, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-03