Tolerability, Safety and Efficacy of Lubricin vs Sodium Hyaluronate Eye Drops in Subjects With Moderate Dry Eye
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled, Non-inferiority Study to Evaluate Tolerability, Safety and Efficacy of Lubricin vs Sodium Hyaluronate in Subjects With Moderate Dry Eye.
2 other identifiers
interventional
56
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objective of the clinical investigation was to evaluate tolerability, safety and efficacy of the tested medical device, eye drop containing Lubricin 150 µg/mL, as compared with a standard sodium hyaluronate 0.13% eye drop solution in subjects with moderate dry eye disease. Primary objective:
- Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) Secondary objectives:
- Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs);
- Visual analogue scale (VAS) for ocular tolerability (foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, stick feeling, blurred vision and photophobia);
- Tear film osmolarity;
- Assessment of best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA)
- Slit lamp examination (SLE) to assess the Eyelid - Meibomian glands, Eyelid Erythema, Eyelid Oedema, Lashes, Conjunctiva Erythema, Lens, Iris, Anterior Chamber, Corneal transparency, Corneal neovascularization;
- Tear film break-up time (TFBUT);
- Corneal fluorescein surface staining (scored using the Oxford scale);
- Schirmer-I test (without anaesthesia) values;
- Intraocular Pressure (IOP) All parameters will be evaluated at screening visit, baseline (day 1), visit 3 (day 14±2) and visit 4 (day 28±4) and at follow-up (final visit) at least 7 days but not more than 9 days after the last treatment. The results for both the SANDE questionnaire and adverse events are reported at the patient level, without distinguishing between Study Eye and Non-Study Eye. This approach reflects the overall condition and experiences of the patient rather than attributing outcomes to individual eyes. The Study Eye was identified as the eye with the worst overall tolerability score at Visit 2 (Day 1).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 9, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 10, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 26, 2025
CompletedFebruary 26, 2025
February 1, 2025
3 months
July 27, 2015
December 22, 2023
February 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline (V2) in Frequency and Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms (SANDE) Questionnaire Scores at Day 28±4 (End of Treatment)
The SANDE (Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye) questionnaire was used to evaluate both dry eye frequency and severity using a 100 mm VAS line, representing ocular dryness and/or irritation at subject's level, according to their own perception, irrespective of the eye being or not the study eye, as per study Protocol. SANDE scores ranged from 0 (best condition) to 100 (worst condition) for both severity and frequency. The VAS score was determined - in millimeters - by measuring from the left-hand end to the marked point on the VAS line. SANDE OVERALL VAS score was calculated considering the mean and the SD of the "Change from Baseline" values at Day 14±2, Day 28±4 and Day 31-41, both for frequency and severity, and then calculated as square-root of the product of the two item score. Results are reported at the patient level, rather than focusing on a single eye, as the SANDE score assesses overall dry eye symptoms rather than eye-specific effects, as per study protocol.
Visit 3 - Day 14±2, Visit 4 - Day 28±4, Visit 5 - Final visit/Follow up - Day 31- 41
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Including Adverse Device Effects (ADEs)
From Visit 2 (Day 1)" i.e., the day of the first IMD administration to Visit 5 - Final visit/Follow up - Day 31- 41
Changes From Baseline (Visit 2, Day 1) in Ocular Tolerability Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Visit 3 - Day 14±2, Visit 4 - Day 28±4, Visit 5 - Final visit/Follow up - Day 31- 41
Change From Baseline in Tear Film Osmolarity
Visit 3 - Day 14±2, Visit 4 - Day 28±4, Visit 5 - Final visit/Follow up - Day 31- 41
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) - ETDRS Score
Visit 3 - Day 14±2, Visit 4 - Day 28±4, Visit 5 - Final visit/Follow up - Day 31- 41
Change From Baseline in Permanence of Lubricin on the Ocular Surface - Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT)
Visit 3 - Day 14±2, Visit 4 - Day 28±4, Visit 5 - Final visit/Follow up - Day 31- 41
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lubricin
EXPERIMENTALLubricin 150 µg/ml eye drops. The test investigational device as well as the comparator, was instilled q.i.d.(four times a day), one drop into each eye for 28±4 days. After the end of the treatment period, all the subjects used 0.13% Sodium hyaluronate eye drops (Ocuyal®) q.i.d. for the following 7-9 days. Before the start of the treatment (run-in period of 7 days), the subjects were allowed to use NaCl 0.9% ocular solution (Nebul®) q.i.d.
Sodium Hyaluronate
ACTIVE COMPARATORSodium hyaluronate 0.13% eye drops. The comparator, as well as the test investigational device, was instilled q.i.d.(four times a day), one drop into each eye for 28±4 days. After the end of the treatment period, all the subjects used 0.13% Sodium hyaluronate eye drops (Ocuyal®) q.i.d. for the following 7-9 days. Before the start of the treatment (run-in period of 7 days), the subjects were allowed to use NaCl 0.9% ocular solution (Nebul®) q.i.d.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be checked at the screening visit (V1) from day -14 to day -8 days before run-in period and confirmed at baseline visit (V2):
- Subjects 18 years of age or older.
- Subjects with moderate dry eye characterized by tear film osmolarity \> 312 mOsm
- Subjects with both VAS for frequency and severity of symptoms, SANDE items, at screening \& baseline \> 25 mm (SANDE overall score \> 25 mm).
- Subjects with moderate dry eye characterized by at least one eye with signs and symptoms of moderate dry eye (grade 2 or 3 of the 2007 DEWS report)
- Subjects diagnosed with dry eye from at least 6 months (current use or recommended use of artificial tears/lubricants for the treatment of Dry Eye)
- Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score of ≥ 0.1 decimal units in both eyes at the time of study enrolment.
- The Informed Consent form approved by the Ethics Committees should be signed by the subject before any study procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of an active ocular infection in either eye
- History or presence of ocular surface disorders not related to dry eye in either eye
- History or evidence of eyelid abnormality in either eye
- Use of topical cyclosporine, topical corticosteroids or any other topical medication for the treatment of dry eye in either eye within 30 days of study enrolment
- History of any ocular surgery (including laser or refractive surgical procedures) in either eye within the 90 days before study enrolment. Ocular surgery will not be allowed during the study treatment period and elective ocular surgery procedures should not be planned during the duration of the follow-up period
- Presence or history of any ocular or systemic disorder or condition that might significantly hinder the efficacy of the study treatment or its evaluation, could possibly interfere with the interpretation of study results, or could be judged by the investigator to be incompatible with the study visit schedule or conduct of trail procedures (e.g. ocular trauma, progressive or degenerative corneal conditions, uveitis, systemic vasculitis, collagen vascular diseases, poorly controlled diabetes, autoimmune disease, systemic infection.)
- Known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the test device or the comparator
- Participation in another clinical study at the same time as the present study or within 90 days of baseline visit
- History of drug, medication or alcohol abuse or addiction.
- Females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or post-menopausal for at least 1 year) are excluded from participation in the study if they meet any one of the following conditions:
- are currently pregnant or,
- have a positive result on the urine pregnancy test at the Screening/Baseline Visit or,
- intend to become pregnant during the study treatment period or,
- are breast-feeding or,
- not willing to use highly effective birth control measures, such as: Hormonal contraceptives - oral, implanted, transdermal, or injected and/or mechanical barrier methods - spermicide in conjunction with a barrier such as a condom or diaphragm or IUD during the entire course of and 30 days after the study treatment periods.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Azienda OspedalieroUniversitaria "Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele" Presidio Ospedaliero S.Marta Clinica oculistica
Catania, 95123, Italy
Ambulatorio Studio delle Malattie della Superficie Oculare, Unità Operativa Complessa di Oftalmologia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Messina
Messina, 98147, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Development & operations
- Organization
- Dompé farmaceutici SpA
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Flavio Mantelli, MD
Dompé farmaceutici
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The packaging used for the comparator in the present investigation aimed at ensuring a complete masking of the test IMD.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2015
First Posted
July 29, 2015
Study Start
March 9, 2015
Primary Completion
June 10, 2015
Study Completion
June 18, 2015
Last Updated
February 26, 2025
Results First Posted
February 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share