Efficacy Comparison of Two Kinds of Treatment in Treating Dry Eye Caused by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of intense pulsed light in treating dry eye caused by meibomian gland dysfunction and make a comparison between the traditional treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 8, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedMay 5, 2022
May 1, 2022
3 months
October 3, 2016
May 1, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
normal value:\<13 abnormal value:≥ 13
through study completion,an average of 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
The concentrations of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1、IL-6 and IL-8
through study completion,an average of 6 months
breakup time of tear film (BUT)
through study completion,an average of 6 months
Corneal Fluorescein Stain(CFS)
through study completion,an average of 6 months
Eyelid ester discharge ability score
through study completion,an average of 6 months
Eyelid ester trait ratings
through study completion,an average of 6 months
Study Arms (2)
traditional treatment group
OTHERSubjects in this group are treated by tobramycin and dexamethasone ophthalmic ointment qn and artificial tears qid.
IPL treatment group
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in this group are treated with 3 cycles of intense pulsed light of 4 weeks interval and artificial tears qid.
Interventions
Intense pulse light (IPL) has been used in dermatology practices for several years as a treatment for rosacea and acne.IPL uses Xenon flashlamp to emit wavelengths of light from 400 to 1200nm. When placed on the light, a filter restricts the wavelength to the visible light range of \*500nm.In 2007-2008, an IPL treatment technology-the Diamond Q4 by DermaMed Solutions-was specifically configured to our specifications with the goal of stimulating secretion of normal meibum via skin treatment effects on the meibomian glands. It was discovered that dry eye patients are better positioned for gland expression, as IPL seems to liquefy the abnormal viscous meibum and dilate the glands.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with dry eye syndrome and diagnosed as MGD
You may not qualify if:
- an infection or inflammatory disease;
- ocular surgical history with in the last 3 months
- SGOGREN SYNDROME
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD.PHD.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2016
First Posted
November 8, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 5, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share