Study Stopped
Lack of funding to continue the study
An Interactive Gaming-based Intervention for Back Pain
Augmenting Back Pain Exercise Therapy Using an Interactive Gaming-based Intervention in the Home Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the outcomes of a traditional, exercise-based rehabilitation intervention for chronic low back pain with the outcomes achieved by combining a traditional intervention with adjunct therapy delivered using an interactive gaming-based system for home-based therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 28, 2019
CompletedMay 28, 2019
May 1, 2019
1.8 years
July 10, 2015
September 25, 2017
May 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Visual Analogue Pain Scale at 4 Weeks
Subjects are asked to indicate their pain level using a visual analog scale, namely they are asked to choose the position on a horizontal line - drawn on a piece of paper - that corresponds to the pain level that they experience. The line is about 10 cm long and is divided into 10 intervals of equal length referred to as units. The minimum value on the scale is zero (meaning no pain). The maximum value on the scale is ten (meaning maximum ever experienced pain).
Change from baseline in Visual Analogue Pain Scale score at 4 weeks
Visual Analogue Pain Scale at 8 Weeks
Subjects are asked to indicate their pain level using a visual analog scale, namely they are asked to choose the position on a horizontal line - drawn on a piece of paper - that corresponds to the pain level that they experience. The line is about 10 cm long and is divided into 10 intervals of equal length referred to as units. The minimum value on the scale is zero (meaning no pain). The maximum value on the scale is ten (meaning maximum ever experienced pain).
Change from baseline in VAS score at 8 weeks
Pain Frequency at 4 Weeks
Subjects are asked how many days they experienced low back pain during the week prior to the study visit.
Change in pain frequency at 4 weeks
Pain Frequency at 8 Weeks
Subjects are asked how many days they experienced low back pain during the week prior to the study visit.
Change in pain frequency at 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 4 Weeks
Change in disability score at 4 weeks
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 8 Weeks
Change in disability score at 8 weeks
SF36 at 4 Weeks
Change in clinical score at 4 weeks
SF36 at 8 Weeks
Change in clinical score at 8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Usual care
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects receive physical therapy for low back pain as typically prescribed in the clinic.
Interactive gaming
EXPERIMENTALSubjects participate in an intervention combining usual care and home-based exercises using the Valedo system.
Interventions
Subjects receive standard physical therapy, including outpatient visits as prescribed by the treating clinician and home-based exercises based on recommendations by the physical therapist.
Subjects receive a combination of standard physical therapy in the clinic and home-based exercises that they perform using the Valedo system.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English speaking
- Back pain subject-rated \> 3 on an 11 point visual-analog scale (0-10), with pain reported for a time \> 6 months
- Able to commit to all study visits
- Low back pain attributable to mechanical etiology as opposed to infectious, neoplastic, or inflammatory causes.
- BMI ≤ 40
- Familiar with tablet use
You may not qualify if:
- Vision or mobility impairment interfering with the performance of the interactive games
- Current or anticipated receipt of payments from Worker's Compensation or other insurance for disability attributed to low back pain
- Additional treatment for back pain during the period of the study, such as acupuncture
- Unresolved musculoskeletal pathology of the lower limbs
- Severe radiculopathic pain
- Alcohol or substance abuse
- Current medication with coumadin or prednisone, chronic use of steroid medications, daily use of narcotic analgesics, or estrogen supplementation, tricyclic anti-depressants (if not on a regular steady dose at least one month prior to enrollment), or any substance that could impair balance.
- Current diagnosis of:
- Balance problems due to vestibular or other neurological impairments.
- Fibromyalgia
- Severe or progressive neurological deficits, including neuromotor impairment
- Any hypercoagulation condition
- Eczema, Psoriasis, or skin infections, and deep vein thrombosis
- Burns or other acute trauma including unhealed bone fractures or open wounds
- Psychiatric illness not well controlled, or current episode of exacerbated major depressive disorder
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, 02129, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Paolo Bonato
- Organization
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paolo Bonato, PhD
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Assessor is blinded to treatment assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2015
First Posted
July 21, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 28, 2019
Results First Posted
May 28, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share