NCT02503410

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the outcomes of a traditional, exercise-based rehabilitation intervention for chronic low back pain with the outcomes achieved by combining a traditional intervention with adjunct therapy delivered using an interactive gaming-based system for home-based therapy.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 10, 2015

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2015

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2017

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 28, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 28, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

July 10, 2015

Results QC Date

September 25, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 24, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

lower backpain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale at 4 Weeks

    Subjects are asked to indicate their pain level using a visual analog scale, namely they are asked to choose the position on a horizontal line - drawn on a piece of paper - that corresponds to the pain level that they experience. The line is about 10 cm long and is divided into 10 intervals of equal length referred to as units. The minimum value on the scale is zero (meaning no pain). The maximum value on the scale is ten (meaning maximum ever experienced pain).

    Change from baseline in Visual Analogue Pain Scale score at 4 weeks

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale at 8 Weeks

    Subjects are asked to indicate their pain level using a visual analog scale, namely they are asked to choose the position on a horizontal line - drawn on a piece of paper - that corresponds to the pain level that they experience. The line is about 10 cm long and is divided into 10 intervals of equal length referred to as units. The minimum value on the scale is zero (meaning no pain). The maximum value on the scale is ten (meaning maximum ever experienced pain).

    Change from baseline in VAS score at 8 weeks

  • Pain Frequency at 4 Weeks

    Subjects are asked how many days they experienced low back pain during the week prior to the study visit.

    Change in pain frequency at 4 weeks

  • Pain Frequency at 8 Weeks

    Subjects are asked how many days they experienced low back pain during the week prior to the study visit.

    Change in pain frequency at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 4 Weeks

    Change in disability score at 4 weeks

  • Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 8 Weeks

    Change in disability score at 8 weeks

  • SF36 at 4 Weeks

    Change in clinical score at 4 weeks

  • SF36 at 8 Weeks

    Change in clinical score at 8 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Usual care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects receive physical therapy for low back pain as typically prescribed in the clinic.

Behavioral: Usual care

Interactive gaming

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects participate in an intervention combining usual care and home-based exercises using the Valedo system.

Behavioral: Interactive gaming

Interventions

Usual careBEHAVIORAL

Subjects receive standard physical therapy, including outpatient visits as prescribed by the treating clinician and home-based exercises based on recommendations by the physical therapist.

Usual care

Subjects receive a combination of standard physical therapy in the clinic and home-based exercises that they perform using the Valedo system.

Interactive gaming

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • English speaking
  • Back pain subject-rated \> 3 on an 11 point visual-analog scale (0-10), with pain reported for a time \> 6 months
  • Able to commit to all study visits
  • Low back pain attributable to mechanical etiology as opposed to infectious, neoplastic, or inflammatory causes.
  • BMI ≤ 40
  • Familiar with tablet use

You may not qualify if:

  • Vision or mobility impairment interfering with the performance of the interactive games
  • Current or anticipated receipt of payments from Worker's Compensation or other insurance for disability attributed to low back pain
  • Additional treatment for back pain during the period of the study, such as acupuncture
  • Unresolved musculoskeletal pathology of the lower limbs
  • Severe radiculopathic pain
  • Alcohol or substance abuse
  • Current medication with coumadin or prednisone, chronic use of steroid medications, daily use of narcotic analgesics, or estrogen supplementation, tricyclic anti-depressants (if not on a regular steady dose at least one month prior to enrollment), or any substance that could impair balance.
  • Current diagnosis of:
  • Balance problems due to vestibular or other neurological impairments.
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Severe or progressive neurological deficits, including neuromotor impairment
  • Any hypercoagulation condition
  • Eczema, Psoriasis, or skin infections, and deep vein thrombosis
  • Burns or other acute trauma including unhealed bone fractures or open wounds
  • Psychiatric illness not well controlled, or current episode of exacerbated major depressive disorder
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston

Boston, Massachusetts, 02129, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Paolo Bonato
Organization
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Study Officials

  • Paolo Bonato, PhD

    Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Assessor is blinded to treatment assignment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2015

First Posted

July 21, 2015

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

June 1, 2017

Last Updated

May 28, 2019

Results First Posted

May 28, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations