Feasibility of a Stress Reduction Intervention Study in Sickle Cell Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
28
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Stress is known to trigger acute pain crisis of sickle cell disease (SCD). SCD is an inherited blood disorder that afflicts about 100,000 people in the United States, and is among the most common lethal genetic diseases in the United States. Though worldwide in distribution, in the US it is most commonly found in African Americans. Its best known complication is severe, recurrent relentless pain, often known as pain crisis. Non-drug treatment for SCD pain such as cognitive coping interventions have been shown to be effective for reducing SCD pain intensity, but they are complicated, multifaceted, and time-consuming. A simple and cost-effective alternative such as guided imagery (GI) could reduce the effect of stress on SCD pain. GI is an intervention where patients listen to and view audio-visual recordings while being directed to visualize themselves being immersed in that scene or scenario. There are no published studies on the use of GI as a simple stress coping intervention or tracking stress in a systematic manner as a trigger for SCD pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2013
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2015
CompletedJuly 17, 2015
July 1, 2015
1 year
July 13, 2015
July 15, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Current stress
Stress intensity scale: A 3-item scale that asks patients to report their current, least, and worst stress intensity today, on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "no stress" and 10 is "stress as bad as it could be." We estimated intervention effects using linear regression with bootstrapping.
Immediate (baseline)
Current pain
PAINReportIt® Pain intensity scale: A 3-item scale that asks patients to report their current, least, and worst pain intensity today, on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as it could be." We estimated intervention effects using linear regression with bootstrapping.
Immediate (baseline)
Average stress intensity
Stress intensity scale: A 3-item scale that asks patients to report their current, least, and worst stress intensity today, on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "no stress" and 10 is "stress as bad as it could be." We averaged the three scores to create an average stress intensity score. We estimated intervention effects using linear regression with bootstrapping.
Short-term (2 weeks)
Composite pain index
PAINReportIt® Composite pain index (CPI): A a multidimensional representation of pain calculated by averaging the individual proportional scores for each of the four pain dimensions: (1) number of pain sites; (2) pain intensity; (3) total pain rating index (from the McGill Pain Questionnaire \[MPQ\], pain quality); and (4) pain pattern score. the scores for the CPI range from 0 to 100. We estimated intervention effects using linear regression with bootstrapping.
Short-term (2 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
Guided audio-visual relaxation group
EXPERIMENTALThe guided relaxation (GR) intervention included a single 12-min GR video clip we administered to subjects at the baseline visit to determine the immediate effects of GR on stress and pain. The GR intervention also included six video clips, which ranged from 2 to 20 minutes in length to determine the short-term (2-week) effects of GR on stress and pain.
Attention Control group
NO INTERVENTIONFor the attention control group, subjects engaged in a 12-min computer-based discussion about their sickle cell disease (SCD) experience. The audio-taped questions and onscreen directions were programmed for self-administration. Subjects' responses were captured via the microphone so that Data Collectors were not involved in this discussion process, and it was equivalent to the guided relation activity.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults 18 years of age or older,
- Diagnosis of SCD,
- Self-reported pain of at least 3 on a 0-10 scale related to SCD,
- Spoke and read English, and
- Self-identified as being of African or Hispanic descent.
You may not qualify if:
- Legally blind or physically unable to complete procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Ezenwa MO, Yao Y, Engeland CG, Molokie RE, Wang ZJ, Suarez ML, Wilkie DJ. A randomized controlled pilot study feasibility of a tablet-based guided audio-visual relaxation intervention for reducing stress and pain in adults with sickle cell disease. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Jun;72(6):1452-63. doi: 10.1111/jan.12895. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
PMID: 26768753DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Miriam O Ezenwa, PhD, RN
University of Illinois at Chicago
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2015
First Posted
July 17, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 17, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07