Comparative Study of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Customized-patient Specific Instrument System.
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as a new technology for improving accuracy in restoration of the alignment and biomechanics of the lower limb. PSI in TKA refers to custom-made cutting jigs manufactured according to the patient's anatomic configuration of distal femur and proximal tibia based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scans. MRI- and CT-based PSI systems are available from various manufacturers for preoperative planning. MRI offers precise visualization of articular cartilage without the risk of radiation exposure, but it is expensive and requires long scan times. In contrast, CT enables accurate identification of the contour of the femur and tibia at short scan times, but it does not provide information on the cartilage thickness and carries the risk of radiation exposure. As a result, there is a possibility of some discrepancy between the thickness of bone resection proposed by MRI- or CT-based PSI system and the actual thickness of bone cut. Although PSI has been the focus of study in many recent researches, there has been no clinical study comparing MRI-based and CT-based PSI systems in preoperative planning. Therefore the investigators questioned whether the MRI-based PSI that reflects the cartilage layer would provide more precision in TKA than the CT-based PSI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of MRI-based PSI and CT-based PSI in predicting bone resection thickness in TKA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2015
CompletedJuly 16, 2015
July 1, 2015
1.6 years
July 13, 2015
July 14, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The absolute differences (mm) between the planned resection thickness and the actual resection thickness in the femur and the tibia.
After bone resection using a patient-specific cutting jig, the actual thickness of resected bone was measured in 0.1 mm increments by the Vernier caliper (B.Braun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) and compared with the planned resection thickness preoperatively using the PSI program.In the MRI group, the intraoperative cutting thickness was compared directly with the preoperatively planned thickness, whereas the presumed thickness of cartilage (2 mm) was added to actual thickness of resected bone from the lateral condyles in the CT group. Finally, the thickness of saw blade (1.27-mm) was added to every resected bone in all cases.
intraoperative time
Secondary Outcomes (1)
radiographic assessment
postoperative 6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
patient specific instrumentation (MRI)
EXPERIMENTALMRI based patient-specific instrumentation
patient specific instrumentation (CT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCT based patient-specific instrumentation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Of the patients who had been scheduled for TKA for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis only with varus deformity, those who had been waiting 6 weeks for TKA using an MRI-based or CT-based PSI system and had consented to the relatively new technique were enrolled in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with primary osteoarthritis with valgus deformity, rheumatoid arthritis, hemophilic arthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, other inflammatory arthritis, or a history of previous high tibial osteotomy were excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong
Seoul, 134-090, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kang-Il Kim, MD,PhD
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor & chairman, department of orthopaedic surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2015
First Posted
July 16, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 16, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07