NCT02500160

Brief Summary

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as a new technology for improving accuracy in restoration of the alignment and biomechanics of the lower limb. PSI in TKA refers to custom-made cutting jigs manufactured according to the patient's anatomic configuration of distal femur and proximal tibia based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scans. MRI- and CT-based PSI systems are available from various manufacturers for preoperative planning. MRI offers precise visualization of articular cartilage without the risk of radiation exposure, but it is expensive and requires long scan times. In contrast, CT enables accurate identification of the contour of the femur and tibia at short scan times, but it does not provide information on the cartilage thickness and carries the risk of radiation exposure. As a result, there is a possibility of some discrepancy between the thickness of bone resection proposed by MRI- or CT-based PSI system and the actual thickness of bone cut. Although PSI has been the focus of study in many recent researches, there has been no clinical study comparing MRI-based and CT-based PSI systems in preoperative planning. Therefore the investigators questioned whether the MRI-based PSI that reflects the cartilage layer would provide more precision in TKA than the CT-based PSI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of MRI-based PSI and CT-based PSI in predicting bone resection thickness in TKA.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2011

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2012

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 13, 2015

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 16, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

July 16, 2015

Status Verified

July 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

July 13, 2015

Last Update Submit

July 14, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The absolute differences (mm) between the planned resection thickness and the actual resection thickness in the femur and the tibia.

    After bone resection using a patient-specific cutting jig, the actual thickness of resected bone was measured in 0.1 mm increments by the Vernier caliper (B.Braun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) and compared with the planned resection thickness preoperatively using the PSI program.In the MRI group, the intraoperative cutting thickness was compared directly with the preoperatively planned thickness, whereas the presumed thickness of cartilage (2 mm) was added to actual thickness of resected bone from the lateral condyles in the CT group. Finally, the thickness of saw blade (1.27-mm) was added to every resected bone in all cases.

    intraoperative time

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • radiographic assessment

    postoperative 6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

patient specific instrumentation (MRI)

EXPERIMENTAL

MRI based patient-specific instrumentation

Device: Patient specific instrumentation (MRI)

patient specific instrumentation (CT)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

CT based patient-specific instrumentation

Device: Patient specific instrumentation (CT)

Interventions

patient specific instrumentation (MRI)
patient specific instrumentation (CT)

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Of the patients who had been scheduled for TKA for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis only with varus deformity, those who had been waiting 6 weeks for TKA using an MRI-based or CT-based PSI system and had consented to the relatively new technique were enrolled in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with primary osteoarthritis with valgus deformity, rheumatoid arthritis, hemophilic arthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, other inflammatory arthritis, or a history of previous high tibial osteotomy were excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong

Seoul, 134-090, South Korea

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Kang-Il Kim, MD,PhD

    Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor & chairman, department of orthopaedic surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2015

First Posted

July 16, 2015

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion

September 1, 2012

Last Updated

July 16, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-07

Locations