Using Question Prompt Lists During Pediatric Asthma Visits to Increase Adolescent Involvement
2 other identifiers
interventional
359
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial with English and Spanish-speaking adolescents to compare the effectiveness of an adolescent "asthma question prompt list" with a supportive educational video intervention with usual care. The hypothesis of this study is that by showing the parents and adolescents the educational video and then providing the adolescents with the one-page "asthma question prompt lists" to use during their visits will improve: (a) asthma control, (b) adolescent self-efficacy in managing asthma, and (c) adolescent quality-of-life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable asthma
Started Jul 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable asthma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 16, 2019
CompletedJanuary 16, 2019
July 1, 2018
2.3 years
June 24, 2015
July 23, 2018
July 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants Achieving Asthma Control
This will be measured via the 5-item Asthma Control Test, responses are summed to indicate a score ranging from 5 (poor asthma control) to 25 (complete asthma control). A higher score means a better outcome. A score of above 19 is considered "well controlled".
12 month follow-up
Adolescent Asthma Management Self-efficacy Score
Adolescent asthma management self-efficacy was measured using a 14-item scale that has been shown to have a reliability of 0.87. Prior work in asthma has found asthma management self-efficacy to change in response to an intervention. Scores range from 14 to 70 and a higher score means a better outcome.
12 month follow-up
Asthma Quality-of-life Score
Adolescent quality-of-life was measured as a continuous variable. The investigators used the standardized version of the Juniper pediatric asthma quality-of-life questionnaire. The questionnaire contains 23 items and has a reliability of 0.84. Scores can range from 1.0 to 7.0, and a higher score means a better outcome.
12 month follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Educational Video and Question Prompt List
EXPERIMENTALParents and adolescents in this group will watch a short educational video in English or Spanish on an iPad about the importance of encouraging adolescents to ask questions and to be involved during their pediatric asthma visits to improve their self-management skills. Also, the adolescents in this group will be handed a question prompt list to complete, which will be collected after the medical visit.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONStandard of care will be used
Interventions
Educational Video and Question Prompt List
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ages 11 to 17 years;
- speak and read English or Spanish;
- have persistent asthma;
- are present for an acute or follow-up asthma visit or a well-child visit;
- and have previously visited the clinic at least once for asthma.
- Adolescents' parents will be eligible if they are at least 18 years of age, speak and read English or Spanish, and are the legal guardian of the adolescent.
You may not qualify if:
- present for gastrointestinal complaints or other non-asthma related acute illness.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolin at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Betsy Sleath, PhD
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Betsy L Sleath, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2015
First Posted
July 15, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 16, 2019
Results First Posted
January 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-07