Study Stopped
PI is leaving the institution
Comparison of Double Lumen Tube Placement Techniques
Comparison of Placement of Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube Using GlideScope With 2 Different Stylet Configurations vs Standard Macintosh Laryngoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare three different standard of care methods of double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) placement in patients who are scheduled to have thoracic surgery in which lung isolation is required.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 27, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 27, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 27, 2018
CompletedJuly 27, 2018
June 1, 2018
2.1 years
July 9, 2015
February 5, 2018
June 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Time to Place the Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube
The time taken for successful intubation will be recorded by the anesthetist. The total duration from the time the laryngoscope is placed at the patient's lips to the first detection of End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), an average of 120 seconds, will be recorded in seconds. A higher duration noted is indicative of a longer time taken for successful intubation. 0 seconds (laryngoscope at patient's lips), (first End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) detection)
during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Success Rate of First Endobronchial Intubation Attempt
during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Assessment of Difficulty of Intubation
during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Number of Cases With Complications
during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Number of Cases of Voice Change
Up to 60 minutes after extubation
Throat Pain
Up to 60 minutes after extubation
Study Arms (3)
ZU-bend stylet with GlideScope technique
EXPERIMENTALSubjects scheduled for thoracic surgery in which the surgeon requests lung isolation will undergo laryngoscopy and intubation using the ZU-bend with the GlideScope technique of a double lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) placement as part of the anesthesia procedure prior to surgery.
GlideScope with the GlideRite stylet
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects scheduled for thoracic surgery in which the surgeon requests lung isolation will undergo laryngoscopy and intubation using the GlideScope with the GlideRite stylet for placement of a double lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) as part of the anesthesia procedure prior to surgery.
Macintosh blade and a regular DLT stylet
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects scheduled for thoracic surgery in which the surgeon requests lung isolation will undergo laryngoscopy and intubation using the direct laryngoscopy technique with the Macintosh blade and a regular double lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) stylet as part of the anesthesia procedure prior to surgery.
Interventions
Laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done using the GlideScope and the ZU-bend stylet. The ZU-bend is a specific shaping technique of the intubating stylet that is closely related to the GlideScope blade curvature. Zu-bend stylet is withdrawn as a part of placement procedure during the DLT advancement. Thereafter, GlideScope is removed and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.
Laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done using the the GlideScope technique. The GlideScope is a video laryngoscope that provides a real-time view of the airway and tube placement during intubation. GlideScope is removed after DLT is in the trachea, and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.
Laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done with the GlideScope using the GlideRite stylet. The GlideRite stylet is specifically designed to work with the GlideScope and provides the necessary rigidity and curvature to an otherwise flexible tube. GlideRite stylet is withdrawn as a part of placement procedure during the DLT advancement. Thereafter, GlideScope is removed and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.
Direct laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done with the Macintosh blade and a regular double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) stylet. The Macintosh blade is used to facilitate visualization of the larynx during double or single lumen endobronchial tube placement. After intubation the Macintosh laryngoscope is removed and the confirmation of the successful placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube in done in the standard fashion.
Direct laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done with a regular double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) stylet and the Macintosh blade. The DLT stylet is withdrawn as a part of placement procedure during the DLT advancement. Thereafter, Macintosh laryngoscope is removed and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients requiring a double-lumen endobronchial tube placement for surgery at Emory University Hospital or Emory University Hospital Midtown
- Patients willing and able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients in whom a previously difficult airway manipulation was recorded on an anesthetic record
- Lung transplantation procedures, as underlying pulmonary disorder that will confound the SpO2 (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation) metric
- Any patient who is receiving anticoagulants in excess of a daily aspirin, patients with an International Normalized Ratio or INR \>1
- Patients in whom one lung ventilation or placement of a double-lumen endobronchial tube is contraindicated
- Patients who require a rapid-sequence intubation
- Patients undergoing emergency procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emory Universitylead
Study Sites (2)
Emory University Hospital Midtown
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Igor Zhukov
- Organization
- Emory University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Igor Zhukov, MD
Emory University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2015
First Posted
July 13, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 27, 2017
Study Completion
July 27, 2017
Last Updated
July 27, 2018
Results First Posted
July 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06