STorz Against Glidescope Effectiveness
STAGE
Comparative Effectiveness of the C-MAC D-blade to Glidescope Videolaryngoscope in the Predicted Difficult Airway
1 other identifier
interventional
1,100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates success rates of tracheal intubation (passing a breathing tube)for patients who may be more challenging to intubate while utilizing one of two devices that facilitate placement of the tube with video technology.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 7, 2014
CompletedNovember 30, 2017
October 1, 2017
1.1 years
June 14, 2012
September 30, 2014
October 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intubation Success Rate
Success rate is defined as a single blade insertion with successful tracheal tube placement confirmed by return of end-tidal carbon dioxide
1 week
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Intubation Time
1 week
Graded Score of Laryngeal View Achieved
1 week
Number of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation
1 week
Number of Participants With Observed Complications
1 week
Study Arms (2)
C-MAC
ACTIVE COMPARATORProviders will utilize the C-MAC video laryngoscope equipped with a D-blade to facilitate intubation
Glidescope
ACTIVE COMPARATORProviders will utilize the Glidescope video laryngoscope equipped with the #4 blade to facilitate intubation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult 18 years of age
- Mallampati classification scale score of 3 or 4
- Neck circumference greater than 40cm for males, 38 cm for females
- mouth opening less than 3cm, but greater than 2cm
You may not qualify if:
- children
- prisoners
- history of easy intubation (success on first attempt with direct laryngoscopy)
- known unstable cervical spine injury
- emergency surgery
- nasal intubation route
- planned awake technique
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oregon Health and Science Universitylead
- University of Iowacollaborator
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houstoncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Related Publications (1)
Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2012 Mar;116(3):629-36. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318246ea34.
PMID: 22261795BACKGROUND
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Aziz, MD
- Organization
- Oregon Health & Science University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2012
First Posted
July 3, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 30, 2017
Results First Posted
October 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2017-10