Evaluation of Dual Channel vs. Single Channel FES for Dropfoot
The Evaluation of Dual Channel vs Single Channel FES for Dropfoot
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Seventy (70) subjects put on the Ness L300 System, a FES device for ankle dorsiflexion for patients with foot drop. Stimulation will be given through two different electrodes: the QFE which is a single channel stimulation, and the Segmented Electrode which is a dual channel electrode. The purpose of the dual channel stimulation is to enable a balanced dorsiflexion, with no inversion/eversion inclinations. Ankle elevation will be recorded both in a seated position and during gait. Subject preference will be recorded through BSW Questionnaire and Subjective Survey. Twenty first subjects will be stimulated with four different dual channel configurations. The configuration that shows to have an advantage over the others will continue to be evaluated on fifty additional subjects. Same procedure will be taken place, in addition ambulation tests will be performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 3, 2016
February 1, 2015
3 months
March 23, 2015
January 13, 2016
June 23, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ankle Movement as Good as or Better With the Segmented Electrode as With the QFE
Subjects were fitted with the L300 Cuff that houses the single channel QFE and then the modified cuff that houses the dual channel segmented electrode. Subjects were stimulated first sitting and then after optimal ankle elevation was achieved, they walked with the stimulation. The clinician documented ankle movement on a 5 point scale: 1-inverted dorsiflexion, 2-slightly inverted dorsiflexion, 3-neutral dorsiflexion,4- slightly everted dorsiflexion, 5- everted dorsiflexion. The clinician documented the number of subjects who achieved each movement with each electrode according to the 5 point scale.
7 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Benefit Satisfaction Willingness to Continue (BSW) Questionnaire
7 months
Study Arms (1)
Functional Electrical Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALDual channel stimulation of the peroneal nerve to improve dropfoot
Interventions
Single channel and dual channel FES for balanced dorsiflexion for patients with dropfoot
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Upper motor neuron lesion.
- Foot drop - toe drag during walking.
- Lower limb spasticity- 0-4 according to the modified Ashworth scale.
- Responsible mental state, able to follow multiple step directions.
- Aged between 18 and 80 years old.
- Available for participating in the study.
- Able to understand and sign the informed consent form.
- Able to walk independently or with an assistance device (e.g. cane, walker etc.) / spot guarding for at least 10 meters.
- Ankle passive range of motion preserved between 10 degrees plantarflexion and 30 degrees dorsiflexion.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with a demand-type cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator or any electrical or metallic implant.
- Cancerous lesion of lower limb, present or suspected.
- Medical condition that prevents participation or would likely lead to inability to comply with the protocol \[e.g.: congestive heart failure, patient receiving chemotherapy, uncontrolled epilepsy, etc.\].
- Skin lesion at the site of the stimulation electrodes.
- Change in bone-joint structures of the lower limb, such as contractures or deformations; fracture or dislocation, which would be adversely affected by motion from the stimulation.
- Pregnancy.
- Diagnosis of major depression or psychotic disorder.
- Participation in another investigation that may directly or indirectly affect the study results.
- Unable to tolerate electrical stimulation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bioness Neuromodulationlead
- Loewenstein Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Bioness Neuromodulations
Hod HaSharon, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
A spot test, no time adjusting to stimulation, no home use, indoor environment only, muscle fatigue is an influential factor that was not checked.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr.Yaron Sacher
- Organization
- Bet-Loewenstein
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bella Kuchuk
R&D Clinician
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2015
First Posted
July 10, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 3, 2016
Results First Posted
April 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share