NCT05849532

Brief Summary

This project will examine the feasibility, safety and effect of home-based functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied to different lower limb muscles in combination with task-specific training on gait, balance and mobility in adults with chronic stroke. 30 individuals with chronic stroke will first undergo initial screening and baseline walking, mobility, balance and strength assessments in the laboratory. After determining their eligibility for the study, they will undergo 12-weeks of home-based FES and task-specific training. Following the initial screening (week 1) and pre-intervention assessment (week 2), participants will be trained in the lab for 6 sessions (week 3-4) for a FES home program and then given a FES home kit (FES device and an android tablet). Participants will then undergo home-training for 2 weeks (week 5-6) followed by mid-training assessment (week 7). Again, participants will undergo 4-weeks of home training (week 8-11) and final assessment at the end of training (week 12). This project has the following specific aims: Aim 1: To investigate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of 12-weeks of home-based FES and task-specific training in adults with chronic stroke. Aim 2: To examine the effect of 12-weeks of home-based FES and task-specific training on mobility, gait and balance (anticipatory and reactive balance) in adults with chronic stroke.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 10, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 16, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 9, 2023

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 30, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

January 16, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic strokeFunctional electrical stimulationHome-training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (27)

  • Change in Dynamic balance from baseline to mid and post-training

    Berg Balance Scale is a 14-point scale that is widely used in the clinic and research settings to test dynamic balance in different populations. This outcome measure tests the balance during various daily living activities including sit to stand, transferring from bed to chair, reaching forward with an outstretched arm, placing alternating foot on stool amongst others. Out of a total score of 56, a score of less than 40 is considered to at moderate fall-risk in people with chronic stroke. A score more than 40 is considered as low to moderate fall-risk for participants to perform home activities. Hence, participants who score \>40 points on 56 will be qualified to transition to the independent home training sessions. Further, dynamic balance will also be assessed using the Limits-of-stability test. Here, the participant will be asked to reach multi-directional targets and their body's center of pressure excursion and movement velocity will be assessed.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in Functional balance from baseline to mid and post-training

    Mini-BESTest scale will be used to assess functional balance. This scale consists of 36-items which assess 6 balance control systems. This scale is a balance assessment tool testing dynamic and reactive balance with six components to assess 1) Biomechanical constraints 2) Stability limits/Verticality 3) Transitions/anticipatory balance 4) Reactive balance 5) Sensory orientation and 6) Stability in Gait

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in the Timed up and go test from baseline to mid and post-training

    Assessed using The Timed Up and Go test, unit of assessment is seconds. The Timed Up and Go test requires the participant to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, come back and sit again "as quickly as possible." Lesser time indicates better functional mobility

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in the Four square step test from baseline to mid and post-training

    Assessed via four square step test, unit of assessment is seconds. The four-square step test is used to assess coordination. Here, the participant is asked to step in a 4 square in clockwise and then anti-clockwise manner and the time to complete the test is recorded. Lesser time taken to complete the test indicates better functional mobility.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in the 30-second chair stand test from baseline to mid and post-training

    Assessed via 30-second chair stand test, unit of assessment is number. The participant is asked to stand from a chair and sit down as fast as they can and as many times as they can and the number of repetitions is recorded. More repetitions indicate more functional mobility.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in functional reaching from baseline to mid and post-training

    This test requires the participant to reach forward with their arms stretched by moving their weight on their toes without bending their back or knees. Functional-reach test is used as an outcome to assess risk of falling.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in volitional balance via Sensory organization testing from baseline to mid and post-training

    Posturography for assessing balance six conditions (SOT): under condition 1 (eyes open), and condition 2 (eyes closed), both the platform and the surround remain immobilized. Under condition 3, the surround moves. Under condition 4, the platform moves and the surround remains fixed. Under condition 5, the platform moves while the subject keeps his/her eyes closed. Under condition 6, both the surround and the platform move.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in isometric muscle strength from baseline to mid and post-training

    Isometric muscle strength of bilateral hip, knee and ankle muscles is assessed using the Biodex dynamometer machine.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in muscle spasticity from baseline to mid and post-training

    Stroke-related muscle spasticity is assessed via Modified Ashworth Scale, which is a universal scale used to test spasticity. The scale is graded ranging from points 0-4 with 0 indicating no increase in muscle tone and 4 indicating that affected part is rigid in flexion and extension

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in the Chedoke McMaster impairment from baseline to mid and post-training

    The Chedoke Mcmaster Assessment Scale (CMSA) (Leg and Foot Subscale). The CMSA Leg and Foot subscale, are 7-point scale each, which assess the severity of motor impairment based on Brunnstorm Stages of Motor recovery. A score of ≥4/7 is considered as low impairment in individuals with stroke.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in the Fugl-Meyer lower extremity scale from baseline to mid and post-training

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is a stroke-specific, performance-based index that assesses sensorimotor function, joint positioning and functioning. Total scoring is of 86 points with higher points indicating higher function.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in the Modified Rankin scale from baseline to mid and post-training

    The modified Rankin scale is 7-point measure of global disability used to assess functional disability after stroke. A score of 0 is considered as no disability whereas a score of 5 is considered as severe disability requiring constant medical care and a score of 6 indicating death.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in peripheral sensation from baseline to mid and post-training

    Peripheral sensations will be assessed using the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament testing. Inability to perceive the 5.07/10g filament indicates loss of lower limb protective sensations.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in physical activity from baseline to mid and post-training

    Physical activity is assessed using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). PASE scale is a brief 5-minute survey that is designed to assess physical activity in the last 7 days. The PASE assesses different types of activities, exercise, housework, yard work, recreational activities and caring for others. The PASE scale grading ranges from a a score of 0-793. Higher score indicates greater physical activity.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in balance confidence from baseline to mid and post-training

    Participant's balance confidence is assessed using: The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. The ABC is a 16-point scale that assesses participant perceived balance confidence during daily living activities ranging from walking around the house to walking outside on icy sidewalks. Each of the 16-points can be graded in terms of percentage with 0 indicating no confidence and 100 indicating complete confidence of not losing balance or becoming unsteady while performing the activity. Higher score indicates higher balance confidence.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in community participation from baseline to mid and post-training

    This is assessed by community integration questionnaire that assesses an individual's community integration using three domains: 1) home and 2) social integration and 3) productive activity. Higher score indicates better community participation.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in overall health status from baseline to mid and post-training

    The Short Form 36 Health Survey will be used for assessment of overall health. The SF-36 has 8-sections scores ranging from 0-100. The 8-sections include: 1) vitality 2) physical functioning 3) Bodily pain 4) General Health perceptions 5) Physical role functioning 6) Emotional role functioning 7) Social role functioning and 8) Mental Health. Higher score indicates better health status.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in overground gait speed from baseline to mid and post-training

    Overground gait speed is assessed using the 10-Meter walk test. Participants will walk for 10-meter with and without assistive device at their comfortable walking speed

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in global cognition from baseline to mid and post-training

    The Montreal Cognitive assessment scale examines different domains of cognitive function like memory, attention, orientation and language and are scored ranging from 0-30 points. Higher score indicates great cognitive function. \< 19 out of 30 indicates cognitive impairment, 19-25 indicates mild cognitive impairment and above 25 indicates intact cognition.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in general cognition from baseline to mid and post-training

    Assessed using the Mini-Mental Assessment Scale (MMSE). The MMSE is a 30-point scale that tests general cognition required to perform everyday living activities. More points indicate higher cognition. A score over 26 indicates higher cognition

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in laboratory induced falls from baseline to mid and post-training

    Perturbation is induced successfully and safely to reproduce inadvertent falls in a protective laboratory environment. Falls will be measured by amount of force recorded on the load cell attached to the ceiling mounted safety harness system donned by the participant. Instability of the body's COM and poor limb support prior to touchdown of the recovery step account for 90\~100% of subsequent falls (occurring \~500ms later) during treadmill-induced stance slip.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in center of mass stability from baseline to mid and post-training

    Stability is defined by both the position of a person's center-of-mass (COM) with respect to his or her base-of-support (BOS) and it's velocity. This will be assessed during treadmill-induced stance slips.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in limb support from baseline to mid and post-training

    The inability to provide timely limb support due to insufficient amount of upward impulse generated from the ground reactive force can cause limb collapse, as characterized by the quotient of amount and rate of hip descent (Vhip/Zhip) measured from hip height and lead to an eventual fall.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in fatigue from baseline to mid and post-training

    Fatigue is assessed using the Fatigue severity scale is a 9-point scale that includes statements regarding an individual's fatigue. The individual grades each statement on a scale of 0-7 with 0 indicating completely disagree and 7 indicating completely agree. Higher score indicates higher fatigue levels with total possible scoring of 63.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in falls efficacy from baseline to mid and post-training

    Falls efficacy is assessed using The Falls Efficacy Scale consisting of 10 activities of dialy living. For each of the activities, the participant has to score on a scale of 1 to 10, 1 being very confident and 10 being not confident at all, how confident is the participant that they can do the activity without falling? Lower score indicates higher confidence. A total score of greater than 70 indicates that the person has a fear of falling.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in maximum loading threshold from baseline to mid and post-training

    The spring-scale test is used to assess the maximum loading threshold for reactive balance. Participant will undergo balance testing in standing where the researcher will deliver waist-pull perturbations in anterior and posterior direction. The maximum loading threshold is the weight at which the participant can maintain their balance without stepping.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

  • Change in maximum stepping threshold from baseline to mid and post-training

    The spring-scale test is used to assess the maximum stepping threshold for reactive balance. Participant will undergo balance testing in standing where the researcher will deliver waist-pull perturbations in anterior and posterior direction. The maximum stepping threshold is the weight at which participant takes a step even after resisting the waist-pull perturbation.

    Baseline (Week 1), mid-training (Week 7) and immediate post-training (Week 12)

Study Arms (1)

Home-training with functional electrical stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

This study employs a single group pre-post design to determine the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a 12-week of home-based combined FES and task-specific training program. Also, this study will test the effect of the same intervention on gait, mobility and balance in adults with chronic stroke.

Device: Functional Electrical Stimulation

Interventions

12-weeks of training sessions that include initial screening and clinical assessment (Week 1-2), onsite training sessions (Week 3-4), home training sessions (Week 4-8). There will also be pre (Week 1), mid (Week 7) and post-training (Week 12) assessment. Each session will consist of a 10-minute warm-up session with 5-6 stretching exercises. Warm-up will be followed by a 30 minute training session comprising of mobility, balance and walking exercises with FES. This will be followed by a cool down session for 10-minutes comprising of 5-6 muscle stretches. The participant will first watch video of the each exercise on the android tablet and then perform the exercises.

Home-training with functional electrical stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age group: 18-90 years.
  • Presence of unilateral hemiparesis.
  • Onset of stroke (\> 6 months).
  • Ability to walk independently with or without an assistive device for at least 300 ft.
  • Can understand and communicate in English and can verbalize discomfort or pain in English
  • Use of smartphone on a daily basis
  • Availability of internet/Wi-Fi at home

You may not qualify if:

  • Body weight more than 250 lbs.
  • Heel bone density measurement using an ultrasound device. Individuals classified as osteoporotic (i.e., with a T-score \< -2) will be excluded.
  • Cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive assessment score \<26/30)
  • Verbal Aphasia (i.e \<71% score on Mississippi Aphasia Screening)
  • Severe depression (\> 15 points on geriatric depression scale)
  • Any neurological condition other than stroke.
  • Uncontrolled and/or untreated hypertension/hypotension, uncontrolled and/or untreated diabetes and any musculoskeletal, neuromuscular or systemic diagnosis .
  • Recent major surgery (\< 6 months) or hospitalization (\< 3 months).
  • Deep venous thrombosis.
  • Past or current history of any type of active cancer
  • Peripheral nerve injury or neuropathy in the affected limb with motor disability.
  • Uncontrolled high blood pressure/angina.
  • Skin condition not tolerant with FES therapy.
  • Past or current history of uncontrolled/controlled epilepsy or any other types of seizure disorders
  • Botox treatment within the last 5 months.
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, 60612-4225, United States

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • Tanvi Bhatt, PhD

    University of Illinois at Chicago

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Rudri Purohit, MS

CONTACT

Jessica Pitts, MS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Single group design to compare the effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait, balance control, physical activity and fall risk in individuals with chronic stroke
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Full Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2023

First Posted

May 9, 2023

Study Start

December 10, 2022

Primary Completion

January 30, 2026

Study Completion

March 30, 2026

Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations