Evaluation of Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the efficacy of the Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator (PAPR) system versus a N95 mask in preventing nasal detection of influenza following an exposure. The investigators hypothesize the use of the Free Air PAPR system will be superior to a N95 respirator at interrupting the exposure of the study participants to aerosolized influenza virus particles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 14, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 12, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 12, 2016
CompletedMarch 4, 2022
October 1, 2018
28 days
June 26, 2015
March 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Nasal Swabs
A nasal swab will be performed immediately following the exposure.
Immediately following Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure
Nasopharyngeal swabs
A nasopharyngeal swab will be performed immediately following the exposure.
Immediately following Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure
Study Arms (2)
N95 Respirator
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will wear an N95 respirator and safety goggles during Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure.
Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will wear a Free Air PAPR and safety goggles during Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure.
Interventions
The Free Air PAPR is a portable air powered respirator that you will wear like a backpack with a mask and tubing attached.
The N95 respirator is a mask that is standardly used clinically at Wake Forest Baptist Health.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-49 years of age
- Employee or student at Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Wake Forest University
You may not qualify if:
- Respiratory tract disorders and other chronic diseases, and medical conditions and treatments which are contraindications to mask usage
- Severe claustrophobia or inability to tolerate masks
- Contraindications to FluMist:
- Children younger than 18 years; proposed age range is 18-49
- Adults 50 years and older; proposed age range is 18-49
- People who have received the live attenuated influenza vaccine within 3 weeks of the exposure sessions
- People with a history of severe allergic reaction to any component of the vaccine or to a previous dose of any influenza vaccine
- People who are allergic to eggs
- Pregnant women
- People with weakened immune systems (immunosuppression)
- People who have taken influenza antiviral drugs within the previous 48 hours
- People who care for severely immunocompromised persons who require a protective environment (or otherwise avoid contact with those persons for 7 days after getting the nasal spray vaccine)
- People of any age with asthma might be at increased risk for wheezing after getting the nasal spray vaccine
- The safety of the nasal spray vaccine has not been established in people with underlying medical conditions that place them at high risk of serious flu complications. This includes children and adults who have lung disease, heart disease (except isolated hypertension), kidney disease (like diabetes), kidney or liver disorders, neurologic/neuromuscular, or metabolic disorders. Moderate or severe acute illness with or without fever is a general precaution for vaccination
- Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) within 6 weeks following a previous dose of influenza vaccine is considered a precaution for use of all influenza vaccines
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wake Forest University Health Scienceslead
- Free Aircollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Wake Forest School Of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Related Publications (18)
Miller MA, Viboud C, Balinska M, Simonsen L. The signature features of influenza pandemics--implications for policy. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2595-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0903906. Epub 2009 May 7. No abstract available.
PMID: 19423872BACKGROUNDInstitute of Medicine (US) Committee on Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Personnel to Prevent Transmission of Pandemic Influenza and Other Viral Respiratory Infections: Current Research Issues; Larson EL, Liverman CT, editors. Preventing Transmission of Pandemic Influenza and Other Viral Respiratory Diseases: Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Personnel: Update 2010. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209584/
PMID: 24983058BACKGROUNDBrankston G, Gitterman L, Hirji Z, Lemieux C, Gardam M. Transmission of influenza A in human beings. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;7(4):257-65. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70029-4.
PMID: 17376383BACKGROUNDBischoff WE, Bassetti S, Bassetti-Wyss BA, Wallis ML, Tucker BK, Reboussin BA, D'Agostino RB Jr, Pfaller MA, Gwaltney JM Jr, Sherertz RJ. Airborne dispersal as a novel transmission route of coagulase-negative staphylococci: interaction between coagulase-negative staphylococci and rhinovirus infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;25(6):504-11. doi: 10.1086/502430.
PMID: 15242200BACKGROUNDBischoff WE, Tucker BK, Wallis ML, Reboussin BA, Pfaller MA, Hayden FG, Sherertz RJ. Preventing the airborne spread of Staphylococcus aureus by persons with the common cold: effect of surgical scrubs, gowns, and masks. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;28(10):1148-54. doi: 10.1086/520734. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
PMID: 17828691BACKGROUNDGwaltney JM, Hendley JO. Respiratory transmission. In: Epidemiologic methods for the study of infectious diseases. (p.213-227) Thomas JC, Weber DJ (eds). Oxford University Press. 2001, New York, New York.
BACKGROUNDBischoff WE. Novel Technique to Study Live Influenza and Common Cold Virus in Mono-Dispersed Aerosols. 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. San Francisco, CA, K-1615a, Sept. 12-15, 2009
BACKGROUNDBischoff WE. Transmission route of rhinovirus type 39 in a monodispersed airborne aerosol. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;31(8):857-9. doi: 10.1086/655022.
PMID: 20569111BACKGROUNDMurayama S, Kawai R, Hirabuki N, Miura T, Mitomo M, Kozuka T, Usio Y. [Intra-arterial ACNU chemotherapy of malignant glioma]. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1988 Feb 25;48(2):144-53. No abstract available. Japanese.
PMID: 3164472BACKGROUNDBischoff WE, Swett K, Leng I, Peters TR. Exposure to influenza virus aerosols during routine patient care. J Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;207(7):1037-46. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis773. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
PMID: 23372182BACKGROUNDHayden FG, Albrecht JK, Kaiser DL, Gwaltney JM Jr. Prevention of natural colds by contact prophylaxis with intranasal alpha 2-interferon. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 9;314(2):71-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198601093140202.
PMID: 3001519BACKGROUNDFord CR, Peterson DE, Mitchell CR. An appraisal of the role of surgical face masks. Am J Surg. 1967 Jun;113(6):787-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(67)90348-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 6023917BACKGROUNDHa'eri GB, Wiley AM. The efficacy of standard surgical face masks: an investigation using "tracer particles". Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 May;(148):160-2.
PMID: 7379387BACKGROUNDMitchell NJ, Hunt S. Surgical face masks in modern operating rooms--a costly and unnecessary ritual? J Hosp Infect. 1991 Jul;18(3):239-42. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(91)90148-2.
PMID: 1680906BACKGROUNDHuang C, Willeke K, Qian Y, Grinshpun S, Ulevicius V. Method for measuring the spatial variability of aerosol penetration through respirator filters. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Jul;59(7):461-5. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010208.
PMID: 9697293BACKGROUNDQian Y, Willeke K, Grinshpun SA, Donnelly J, Coffey CC. Performance of N95 respirators: filtration efficiency for airborne microbial and inert particles. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Feb;59(2):128-32. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010389.
PMID: 9487666BACKGROUNDTreanor JJ, Kotloff K, Betts RF, Belshe R, Newman F, Iacuzio D, Wittes J, Bryant M. Evaluation of trivalent, live, cold-adapted (CAIV-T) and inactivated (TIV) influenza vaccines in prevention of virus infection and illness following challenge of adults with wild-type influenza A (H1N1), A (H3N2), and B viruses. Vaccine. 1999 Dec 10;18(9-10):899-906. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(99)00334-5.
PMID: 10580204BACKGROUNDThe Rainbow Passage, a public domain text, can be found on page 127 of the 2nd edition of Grant Fairbanks' Voice and Articulation Drillbook. New York: Harper & Row
BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Werner Bischoff, MD, PhD
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2015
First Posted
July 1, 2015
Study Start
November 14, 2016
Primary Completion
December 12, 2016
Study Completion
December 12, 2016
Last Updated
March 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2018-10