Comparative Effectiveness of Hot Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy of Small Colorectal Polyps
HOT/COLD
1 other identifier
interventional
429
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate the comparative effectiveness between polyp removal with or without electrical current. The investigators want to include 600 polyps in the trial. It is known that polyps have the potential to develop to cancer if left in situ, but the investigators do not know the best way to remove them completely.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedFebruary 23, 2023
December 1, 2021
5 years
April 24, 2015
February 22, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complete resection rate
We want to measure the rate of polyps that are resected completely, both with biopsies from the margin and the histopathologists evaluation of the resection margins of the polyp itself.
Hopefully within 4 weeks, when the histopathologist has examined the biopsies
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Complications
4 weeks
Factors explaining the primary outcome
During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks.
Factors explaining the primary outcome
During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks
Factors explaining the primary outcome
During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks
Factors explaining the primary outcome
During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Cold polypectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this arm will have their polyps removed by cold polypectomy, i.e. a metal sling that is closed around the basis of the polyp, and the polyp is cut off. After removal there will be taken biopsies from the resection margins, and both the polyp and the biopsies will be examined by a histopathologist to see if the polyp is removed completely.
Hot polypectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this arm will have their polyps removed by hot polypectomy, i.e. a metal sling taht is closed around the basis of the polyp, electrical currents is applied, and the polyp is cut off. After removal there will be taken biopsies from the resection margins, and both the polyp and the biopsies will be examined by a histopathologist to see if the polyp is removed completely.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Outpatient colonoscopy
- Signed, written informed consent
- At least one flat/sessile polyp sized 4-9 mm identified during colonoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Implanted cardiac electro converter
- Severe comorbidity (NYHA 3-4)
- Known coagulopathy (INR \> 1,8) or resent use of any of the new oral anti-coagulant medications
- Platelet count \< 100
- Resent use of clopidogrel or other non-acetylsalicylic acid platelet inhibitor (Last dose \< 5 days before the procedure)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Pedersen IB, Rawa-Golebiewska A, Calderwood AH, Brix LD, Grode LB, Botteri E, Bugajski M, Kaminski MF, Januszewicz W, Odegaard H, Kleist B, Kalager M, Loberg M, Bretthauer M, Hoff G, Medhus A, Holme O. Complete polyp resection with cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for polyps of 4-9 mm: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2022 Oct;54(10):961-969. doi: 10.1055/a-1734-7952. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
PMID: 35008112DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2015
First Posted
June 29, 2015
Study Start
May 18, 2015
Primary Completion
May 20, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
February 23, 2023
Record last verified: 2021-12