High Fidelity Simulation vs Standard Teaching Training of Cardiac Resuscitation
SIMCARE
High Fidelity Simulation In Medecine Education
1 other identifier
interventional
181
1 country
1
Brief Summary
High fidelity Simulation has spread from anesthesiology to other disciplines such as internal medicine, pediatrics, and emergency medicine . Over the past decade, the use of simulation in medical education has increased exponentially. The term ''simulation'' spans a wide variety of formats, from the low-tech actor portraying a standardized patient to high-fidelity mannequin-based human patient simulation (HPS). HPS is able of both simulating realistic patient encounters and giving real-time, physiologically accurate feedback. Studies thus far show that use of simulation in training medical students and residents is helpful in strengthening students' knowledge and in evaluating their performance. Students appreciate simulation-based education as ''an opportunity to learn new skills in a safe environment .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedJune 20, 2016
June 1, 2016
1.6 years
February 20, 2015
June 17, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
better acquisition of cognitive skills for students
Pretest using 20 multiple choice questions after randomization. A second round of the same testing was then conducted for both groups just after the course (posttest). The test score range from 0 to 20 (maximum). The difference between the rating of the post-test and pre-test identifies the delta score of the student.
just after randomisation (one day)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction 5 point likert scale
just after randomisation (one day)
Study Arms (2)
huma patient based training
EXPERIMENTALStudents randomized to receive simulation training .The mannequin Siman 3G laerdal® displays multiple physiologic and pharmacologic responses. Three volunteers were involved in the scenario while the others were observers through an audiovisual projection. Students participating in the scenario were given 15 minutes to evaluate and manage a 60-year-old man with a known history of coronary artery disease and diabetes who presented to the emergency department with chest pain revealing an acute ST elevation myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular fibrillation. Students were required to recognize and manage ventricular fibrillation when the patient became pulseless and unresponsive. After performing the simulation, the entire group was convened for debriefing of the case.
traditionally teaching
ACTIVE COMPARATORstudents received a traditional course using slides during 60 minutes about the management of cardio pulmonary resuscitation according to the latest recommendations of the AHA. This course is offered by the same trainer who participated in the simulation session. Students were free to ask questions as the progress of education. The same educational objectives were treated with the two groups.
Interventions
Students randomized to receive simulation training .The mannequin Siman 3G laerdal® displays multiple physiologic and pharmacologic responses. Three volunteers were involved in the scenario while the others were observers through an audiovisual projection. Students participating in the scenario were given 15 minutes to evaluate and manage a 60-year-old man with a known history of coronary artery disease and diabetes who presented to the emergency department with chest pain revealing an acute ST elevation myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular fibrillation. Students were required to recognize and manage ventricular fibrillation when the patient became pulseless and unresponsive. After performing the simulation, the entire group was convened for debriefing of the case.
Control group students received a traditional course using slides during 60 minutes about the management of cardio pulmonary resuscitation according to the latest recommendations of the AHA. This course is offered by the same trainer who participated in the simulation session. Students were free to ask questions as the progress of education. The same educational objectives were treated with the two groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Medecine students
You may not qualify if:
- Non Medecine students
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
university of Monastir
Monastir, Monastir Governorate, 5000, Tunisia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hamdi Boubaker, MD
Emergency Department , university Hospital of Monastir 5000 TUNISIA
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed habib GRISSA, MD
Emergency Department , university Hospital of Monastir 5000 TUNISIA
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2015
First Posted
June 29, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06