NCT02483429

Brief Summary

AVERT is a randomized controlled trial comparing video-oculography (VOG)-guided care to standard care to assess accuracy of diagnoses and initial management decisions for emergency department (ED) patients with a chief symptom of vertigo or dizziness suspected to be of vestibular cause. The trial will test the hypothesis that VOG-guided rapid triage (VRT) will accurately, safely, and efficiently differentiate peripheral from central vestibular disorders in ED patients presenting acute vertigo or dizziness, and that doing so has the potential to improve post-treatment clinical outcomes for these patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
130

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 3, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 29, 2015

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 4, 2017

Completed
5.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 17, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 17, 2023

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 9, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 26, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.3 years

First QC Date

March 3, 2015

Results QC Date

October 22, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 8, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

VertigoDizzinessUnsteadinessStrokeVestibular neuritisBenign paroxysmal positional vertigoVestibulo-ocular reflexVideo-oculographyEmergency department

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • VRT vs. ED SOC Six-Category Diagnosis Accuracy (Primary Analysis-eligible Participants, Two-arm Comparison)

    Total diagnosis accuracy VRT vs. ED SOC using 30-day adjudicated final diagnoses categorized in one of six diagnosis categories (3 peripheral, 1 central, 1 medical/other, 1 non-diagnosis). VRT diagnoses were based on automated interpretation of ED index VOG tests in the context of structured medical history information and examination findings from the ED index visit (clinically supervised for safety), while ED SOC diagnoses were based on all clinical information from the ED index visit, including neuroimaging and consultations. Final diagnoses were based on ED index visit, 1-week, and 30-day follow-up clinical assessments. The population was limited to those with complete 1-week follow-up testing including in-person vestibular specialist exam, repeat VOG assessment, and MRI with diffusion-weighted images for ischemic stroke detection.

    30-day follow-up time point

  • VRT vs. ED SOC Total Diagnostic Utilization Costs at the ED Index Visit (Primary Analysis-eligible Participants, Two-arm Comparison)

    Total US dollar costs VRT vs. ED SOC for diagnostic tests and consultations obtained during the ED index visit and associated hospital admission (for those admitted at the index visit). For the VRT arm, this does not include costs of safety MRIs required by the institutional review board (IRB)-approved protocol or any tests ordered "off protocol" by ED physicians (i.e., it represents VRT-recommended utilization-based costs); however, it does include tests, consultations, or admissions ordered "on protocol" by consultants or ED physicians in the VRT "equivocal" diagnosis pathway. For the SOC arm, this includes all utilization-related costs from the ED index visit (tests, consultations, or admissions). Total costs are calculated by multiplying fixed cost estimates (2025 national average Medicare reimbursement in US dollars) by utilization rates for each ED index visit service tracked.

    30-day follow-up time point

  • Participants With Short-Term Prespecified Medical Event(s) of Interest (PMEIs) After a Correct vs. Incorrect Diagnosis (Primary Analysis-eligible Participants, One-arm Comparison [SOC Arm Only])

    PMEIs included ED revisits, falls, vascular events, and test or treatment complications. PMEIs occurring between the ED index visit disposition and 1-week follow-up visit (after which the two arms joined the same diagnostic pathway) were considered. Events diagnosed at ED index visit were not counted. Events newly diagnosed at 1-week follow-up or in the interval prior to 1-week follow-up were counted, regardless of relatedness to ED index dizziness symptoms, with the exception of test or treatment complications, which were required to be related directly or indirectly to the dizziness symptoms. To avoid "double counting" misdiagnoses as follow-on PMEIs pursuant to an initial misdiagnosis, 1-week stroke diagnoses not rendered at the ED index visit were not counted unless neurologic or vestibular symptoms/signs worsened after the ED index visit. Six-category accuracy was used to determine "correct" vs. "incorrect" index ED SOC diagnoses relative to 30-day adjudicated final diagnoses.

    1-week follow-up time point

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Expert VOG vs. ED SOC Six-Category Diagnosis Accuracy (Participants With a Known Final Diagnosis, One-arm Comparison [SOC Arm Only])

    30-day follow-up time point

  • VRT vs. ED SOC Stroke-No Stroke Diagnosis Accuracy (Primary Analysis-eligible Participants, Two-arm Comparison)

    30-day follow-up time point

Study Arms (2)

VRT Care

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomized to VRT (VOG-guided Rapid Triage) care will have an algorithm-determined patient-specific diagnosis and treatment pathway in the emergency department. Participants will complete a 1-week in-person follow-up and a 1-month and 6-month phone follow-up.

Device: VRT Care

Standard of Care (SOC)

NO INTERVENTION

Patients randomized to Standard of Care will undergo usual emergency department care without revealing results of VOG testing. Participants will complete a 1-week in-person follow-up and a 1-month and 6-month phone follow-up.

Interventions

VRT CareDEVICE

The VOG report includes direct device output (physiologic traces, quantitative measures) plus most likely diagnosis, category, and clinical trial care pathway (peripheral, equivocal, central) instructions. The VOG report becomes part of the patient's emergency department clinical record.

Also known as: GN Otometrics (Instrumentation & Control Systems, Inc)
VRT Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult (18 years and older) ED patients with all of the following (all determined pre-randomization):
  • VESTIBULAR SYMPTOMS: presenting symptom of "vertigo" OR "dizziness" OR "unsteadiness" (as defined by consensus expert definitions in the International Classification of Vestibular Disorders).
  • RELEVANT EXAM SIGNS\*: pathologic nystagmus (spontaneous, gaze-evoked, or positional) by bedside VOG testing OR pathologic ataxia (gait, trunk, stance, limbs) by bedside ataxia examination.
  • RECENT ONSET: symptoms AND signs\* appear to be new or markedly worse in the past month. (\*Exam signs are required for randomization, but not for the observational arm)

You may not qualify if:

  • Excluded from Pre-Randomization Screening
  • Level 1 trauma or critical illness
  • Altered mental status (e.g., delirium, dementia) that would preclude active study participation (this includes patients with abnormal mental state due to alcohol intoxication or illicit substance, which are known, easily-recognized causes of dizziness or vertigo presentations to the ED)
  • Non-English speaking (enrollment of non-English speakers is not feasible given the logistics of identifying a translator and the need for rapid recruitment and randomization in the AVERT study; furthermore, the terms vertigo, dizziness, and unsteadiness may have different meanings in other languages)
  • Known pregnancy (all women of childbearing age who are enrolled will undergo a urine or serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin \[hCG\] pregnancy test prior to MRI to confirm no pregnancy, per local institutional guidelines)
  • Unable or unsafe to participate in screening, including VOG tests (as deemed by specific pre-enrollment risk assessment questions or ED provider and/or Study Coordinator judgment) including, but not limited to:
  • visual impairment sufficient to prevent visual fixation during the VOG testing
  • clinically-perceived risk to patient of participating in study (ED provider or staff concerns)
  • clinically-perceived risk to research staff (e.g., violence, blood/body fluid/respiratory precautions)
  • unstable cardiac status (given a single reported case of bradycardia with impulse testing)
  • acute cranio-cervical trauma or other condition (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) that might lead to instability of the cervical spine that would be a contraindication to neck rotation during VOG testing
  • Obvious general medical cause (as judged by treating ED provider) including, but not limited to, acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, drug intoxication, etc.
  • Excluded from Randomization (Eligible for Observational Arm Follow-up)
  • Patient previously randomized in the AVERT Trial (previously screened but not randomized are eligible)
  • Unable to participate fully with study follow-up (particularly MRI) including, but not limited to:
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

University of Illinois

Peoria, Illinois, 61656, United States

Location

Johns Hopkins Hospital - Bayview

Baltimore, Maryland, 21224, United States

Location

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

Mt. Sinai Medical Center

New York, New York, 10029, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Edlow JA, Carpenter C, Akhter M, Khoujah D, Marcolini E, Meurer WJ, Morrill D, Naples JG, Ohle R, Omron R, Sharif S, Siket M, Upadhye S, E Silva LOJ, Sundberg E, Tartt K, Vanni S, Newman-Toker DE, Bellolio F. Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department 3 (GRACE-3): Acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2023 May;30(5):442-486. doi: 10.1111/acem.14728.

  • Kotwal S, Fanai M, Fu W, Wang Z, Bery AK, Omron R, Tevzadze N, Gold D, Garibaldi BT, Wright SM, Newman-Toker DE. Real-world virtual patient simulation to improve diagnostic performance through deliberate practice: a prospective quasi-experimental study. Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Mar 8;8(4):489-496. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0127. Print 2021 Nov 25.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

VertigoDizzinessStrokeVestibular NeuronitisBenign Paroxysmal Positional VertigoEmergencies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vestibular DiseasesLabyrinth DiseasesEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSensation DisordersCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVestibulocochlear Nerve DiseasesRetrocochlear DiseasesCranial Nerve DiseasesDisease AttributesPathologic Processes

Results Point of Contact

Title
David E. Newman-Toker
Organization
Johns Hopkins University

Study Officials

  • David Newman-Toker, MD, PhD

    Johns Hopkins University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2015

First Posted

June 29, 2015

Study Start

December 4, 2017

Primary Completion

March 17, 2023

Study Completion

March 17, 2023

Last Updated

December 26, 2025

Results First Posted

December 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations