Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of LME636 in the Treatment of Acute Anterior Uveitis
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LME636 in Patients With Acute Anterior Uveitis
1 other identifier
interventional
45
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine whether topical ocular administration of LME636 60 mg/mL is efficacious in resolving the ocular inflammation in the anterior chamber (AC) associated with acute anterior uveitis (AAU).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jul 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 17, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 21, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 21, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 28, 2017
CompletedJuly 2, 2018
July 1, 2017
8 months
June 23, 2015
July 28, 2017
May 31, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Number of Responders at Day 15
Response was defined as a two-step decrease or more from baseline in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade as per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). Baseline was defined as the measurement taken before drug administration on Day 1. Subjects receiving rescue treatment on or before Day 15 were considered non-responders. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 15
Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Each Visit
Visual Acuity (VA) with the subject's best spectacles or other visual corrective devices was measured using an Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) or Snellen visual acuity chart and reported in letters read correctly. An increase (gain) in letters read indicates improvement. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Visit
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry or Tonopen and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
Number of Subjects With Increase From Baseline in Slit Lamp Parameters at Any Post-Treatment Visit
Slit-lamp biomicroscopy (examination) was performed to evaluate the anterior segment of the eye, including lids/lashes, conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber (cells and flare), iris, and lens. Ocular signs were categorized as Aqueous Flare, Aqueous Inflammatory Cell Grade, Keratic Precipitates, Lens, Limbal Injection, Status of Lens, Peripheral Anterior Synechia, and Posterior Synechia. An increase indicates worsening. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
Number of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in Dilated Fundus Parameters at Any Post-Treatment Visit
The dilated fundus examination was performed to evaluate the health of the vitreous, optic disc, retinal vessels, macula, and retinal periphery. An increase indicates worsening. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of Subjects With IOP Change From Baseline to Last On-Treatment Assessment
Baseline (Day 1), Up to Day 29
Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA at Each Visit
Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
Time-to-Response
Baseline (Day 1), Up to Day 15
Use of Rescue Treatment
Day 4, Day 8, Day 15
Mean Serum Concentration of Total LME636 at Each Visit
Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LME636
EXPERIMENTALLME636 60 mg/mL ophthalmic solution, maximum drop frequency administered for 2 weeks, followed by a tapering for 1 week (Week 3) and 1 week of masked Vehicle administration (Week 4)
Dexamethasone
ACTIVE COMPARATORDexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic solution, maximum drop frequency administered for 2 weeks, followed by a tapering for 2 weeks (Weeks 3 and 4)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provide written informed consent.
- Diagnosis of non-infectious AAU in at least 1 eye.
- Anterior chamber cell score of 2+ or 3+ as per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) in at least one eye.
- Able to communicate well with the Investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Women of child-bearing potential unwilling to use effective contraception methods as defined in the protocol.
- AC cell score of 4+ (SUN) or hypopyon.
- Onset of anterior uveitis more than 2 weeks prior to enrollment in the study.
- Presence of intermediate-, posterior-, or panuveitis in either eye.
- Administration of stable doses \>10 mg daily systemic prednisone or corticosteroids as described in the protocol.
- Recurrent corneal abrasion or ulceration in either eye (past or present).
- Tuberculosis (past or present).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alcon Researchlead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ophthalmology & Medical Lead, Translational Medicine, NIBR
- Organization
- Alcon, A Novartis Division
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Scientist NIBR, Alcon
Alcon Research
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2015
First Posted
June 26, 2015
Study Start
July 17, 2015
Primary Completion
March 21, 2016
Study Completion
March 21, 2016
Last Updated
July 2, 2018
Results First Posted
August 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07