NCT02482129

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine whether topical ocular administration of LME636 60 mg/mL is efficacious in resolving the ocular inflammation in the anterior chamber (AC) associated with acute anterior uveitis (AAU).

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 23, 2015

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 26, 2015

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 17, 2015

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 21, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 21, 2016

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 28, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

July 2, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

June 23, 2015

Results QC Date

July 28, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 31, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Acute anterior uveitisLME636

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Number of Responders at Day 15

    Response was defined as a two-step decrease or more from baseline in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade as per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). Baseline was defined as the measurement taken before drug administration on Day 1. Subjects receiving rescue treatment on or before Day 15 were considered non-responders. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Day 1), Day 15

  • Mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Each Visit

    Visual Acuity (VA) with the subject's best spectacles or other visual corrective devices was measured using an Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) or Snellen visual acuity chart and reported in letters read correctly. An increase (gain) in letters read indicates improvement. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29

  • Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Visit

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry or Tonopen and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29

  • Number of Subjects With Increase From Baseline in Slit Lamp Parameters at Any Post-Treatment Visit

    Slit-lamp biomicroscopy (examination) was performed to evaluate the anterior segment of the eye, including lids/lashes, conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber (cells and flare), iris, and lens. Ocular signs were categorized as Aqueous Flare, Aqueous Inflammatory Cell Grade, Keratic Precipitates, Lens, Limbal Injection, Status of Lens, Peripheral Anterior Synechia, and Posterior Synechia. An increase indicates worsening. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29

  • Number of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in Dilated Fundus Parameters at Any Post-Treatment Visit

    The dilated fundus examination was performed to evaluate the health of the vitreous, optic disc, retinal vessels, macula, and retinal periphery. An increase indicates worsening. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Number of Subjects With IOP Change From Baseline to Last On-Treatment Assessment

    Baseline (Day 1), Up to Day 29

  • Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA at Each Visit

    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29

  • Time-to-Response

    Baseline (Day 1), Up to Day 15

  • Use of Rescue Treatment

    Day 4, Day 8, Day 15

  • Mean Serum Concentration of Total LME636 at Each Visit

    Baseline (Day 1), Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

LME636

EXPERIMENTAL

LME636 60 mg/mL ophthalmic solution, maximum drop frequency administered for 2 weeks, followed by a tapering for 1 week (Week 3) and 1 week of masked Vehicle administration (Week 4)

Drug: LME636 60 mg/mL ophthalmic solutionDrug: LME636 Vehicle

Dexamethasone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic solution, maximum drop frequency administered for 2 weeks, followed by a tapering for 2 weeks (Weeks 3 and 4)

Drug: Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic solution

Interventions

Inactive ingredients used for masking purposes

LME636

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Provide written informed consent.
  • Diagnosis of non-infectious AAU in at least 1 eye.
  • Anterior chamber cell score of 2+ or 3+ as per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) in at least one eye.
  • Able to communicate well with the Investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Women of child-bearing potential unwilling to use effective contraception methods as defined in the protocol.
  • AC cell score of 4+ (SUN) or hypopyon.
  • Onset of anterior uveitis more than 2 weeks prior to enrollment in the study.
  • Presence of intermediate-, posterior-, or panuveitis in either eye.
  • Administration of stable doses \>10 mg daily systemic prednisone or corticosteroids as described in the protocol.
  • Recurrent corneal abrasion or ulceration in either eye (past or present).
  • Tuberculosis (past or present).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Uveitis, Anterior

Interventions

Ophthalmic SolutionsDexamethasone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PanuveitisUveitisUveal DiseasesEye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pharmaceutical SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical PreparationsTherapeutic UsesPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesSpecialty Uses of ChemicalsPregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, Fluorinated

Results Point of Contact

Title
Ophthalmology & Medical Lead, Translational Medicine, NIBR
Organization
Alcon, A Novartis Division

Study Officials

  • Clinical Scientist NIBR, Alcon

    Alcon Research

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2015

First Posted

June 26, 2015

Study Start

July 17, 2015

Primary Completion

March 21, 2016

Study Completion

March 21, 2016

Last Updated

July 2, 2018

Results First Posted

August 28, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-07