NCT02365519

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of LME636 compared to vehicle in the reduction of ocular symptoms and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of LME636, when administered topically for up to 42 days, in subjects with severe dry eye disease.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
514

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2015

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 13, 2015

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 19, 2015

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 9, 2015

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 16, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 16, 2015

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 24, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

July 2, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

February 13, 2015

Results QC Date

August 16, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 31, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

LME636dry eye diseaseefficacyocular discomfort

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Global Ocular Discomfort Score at Day 71

    Discomfort frequency and severity (each graded on a separate 100-units scale) were assessed daily using a visual analog scale (VAS) displayed on a handheld digital Pad (electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO)). Frequency score was in response to the question 'how often your eyes felt uncomfortable during the past 24 hours' ranging from 'Rarely' to 'All the time.' Severity score was in response to the question 'how uncomfortable your eyes felt during the past 24 hours' ranging from 'Very mildly uncomfortable' to 'Very severely uncomfortable.' The Global Ocular Discomfort Score, ranging from 0 to 100, was calculated for any given day, as the square root of the product of the discomfort frequency score multiplied by the discomfort severity score. Improvement results in a reduction of the discomfort frequency or severity, or both, translating into a reduction of the resulting Global Ocular Discomfort score as compared to baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Baseline (Day 43), Day 71

  • Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

    Visual Acuity (VA) with the subject's best spectacles or other visual corrective devices was measured using an ETDRS visual acuity chart at 3 meters (10 feet) and reported in letters read correctly. An increase (gain) in letters read indicates improvement. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Day 43), Day 57, Day 71, Day 85

  • Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

    IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry or Tonopen and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Day 43), Day 57, Day 71, Day 85

  • Percentage of Subjects With Increase in Slit-Lamp Parameter From Baseline to Any Visit

    Ocular signs (cornea, lens, and iris/anterior chamber) were assessed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. An increase indicates worsening. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Day 43), Day 57, Day 71, Day 85

  • Percentage of Subjects With Increase in Dilated Fundus Parameter From Baseline to Any Visit

    The dilated fundus examination was performed to evaluate the health of the vitreous, retina, macula, choroid, and optic nerve. An increase indicates worsening. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.

    Baseline (Day 43), Day 57, Day 71, Day 85

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Percentage of Subjects With More Than 20 Units Improvement in Global Ocular Discomfort Score From Baseline at Day 71

    Baseline (Day 43), Day 71

  • Percentage of Subjects With LME636 Serum Concentrations Below the Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ)

    Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 57, Day 71, Day 85

  • Percentage of Subjects With Anti-LME636 Antibodies by Visit

    Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 57, Day 71, Day 85

Study Arms (2)

LME636

EXPERIMENTAL

LME636 ophthalmic solution, 1 drop (approx. 40 µL; 2.4 mg) administered topically in each eye 3 times a day (TID) for 6 weeks

Biological: LME636 ophthalmic solution

Vehicle

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

LME636 Vehicle, 1 drop administered topically in each eye TID for 6 weeks

Biological: LME636 Vehicle

Interventions

LME636 VehicleBIOLOGICAL

Inactive ingredients used as a placebo comparator

Vehicle

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Must sign written informed consent.
  • Physician diagnosis of DED of at least 6 months prior to Visit 1.
  • Must use artificial tears, gels, lubricants or re-wetting drops on a regular basis.
  • Respond as "often" or "constantly" to the question "How often do your eyes feel uncomfortable?".
  • Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of 55 or greater in each eye as measured by ETDRS at Visit 1.

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of any acute infection or non-infectious ocular condition in either eye within 1 month of Visit 1.
  • Contact lens wearers, defined as individuals who cannot be without their contact lenses for the entire duration of the study.
  • Any chronic ocular degenerative condition that in the opinion of the Investigator could possibly advance during the time course of the study.
  • Use of biologics treatments, such as systemic biologic anti-cytokines, including anti-TNFα drugs, or immunosuppressive therapy for the treatment of severe systemic autoimmune disorders.
  • Diseases or conditions affecting the ocular surface that are associated with clinically significant scarring and or destruction of conjunctiva and/or cornea.
  • Unwilling to abstain from topical ocular non-prescription medications during the course of the study, including concomitant use of artificial tears, gels, lubricants, re-wetting drops, allergy drops, etc. after Visit 2.
  • Use of nasal, inhaled, systemic (including injections), or topical corticosteroids within 30 days of Visit 1.
  • Women of child-bearing potential unwilling to use effective contraception methods as defined in the protocol.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Ophthalmology & Medical Lead, Translational Medicine, NIBR
Organization
Alcon, A Novartis Division

Study Officials

  • Senior Clinical Manager, GCRA

    Alcon, A Novartis Division

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2015

First Posted

February 19, 2015

Study Start

March 9, 2015

Primary Completion

October 16, 2015

Study Completion

October 16, 2015

Last Updated

July 2, 2018

Results First Posted

November 24, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-10