Comparative Analysis of APACHE II and P-POSSUM
1 other identifier
observational
159
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare APACHE II and P-POSSUM scoring system in emergency laparotomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2013
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 27, 2016
CompletedOctober 15, 2019
May 1, 2016
11 months
June 9, 2015
December 20, 2015
October 6, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) as a Measure of the Accuracy of the APACHE II and P-POSSUM Scoring Systems to Predict Mortality
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay (expected average of 30 days) and mortality was noted.All patients undergoing emergency laparotomy at Tata Main Hospital form 01st December 2013 to 30th November 2014 were included in the study. All patients were scored with APACHE II and P-POSSUM scoring systems on the day of surgery. Area under the curve (AUC) is used to measure the "size" of the prediction composed by the graphic display between the 'sensitivity' and the '1-specificity' relationship. AUC can range from 0.5 to 1.0 and a result of 1.0 indicates a perfect discriminatory ability. An AUC value \> 0.8 is considered good, a range between 0.60-0.80 is considered as moderate, and an AUC value \< 0.60 is regarded as poor. For APACHE-II, a cut off score of \>/=24 was determined; for P-POSSUM, a cut off score of \>/= 63 was determined.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Length of Stay (LOS)
30 days
Need for Postoperative Ventilator Support
30 days
Need for Post Operative Inotropic Support
30 days
Cardiac Morbidity (AMI or Arrhythmias Needing Treatment)
30 days
Number of Participants With Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)
30 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
All patients undergoing emergency laparotomy at Tata Main Hospital form 01st December 2013 to 30th November 2014 will be included in the study. All patients will be scored with APACHE II and P-POSSUM scoring systems on the day of surgery.The patients will be followed up till discharge, death or 30 days postoperatively.
You may qualify if:
- All patients above 18 years of age undergoing emergency laparotomy at Tata Main Hospital form 01st December 2013 to 30th November 2014 will be included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients willingly seeking referral to a different hospital
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tata Main Hospital
Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, 831001, India
Related Publications (1)
Nag DS, Dembla A, Mahanty PR, Kant S, Chatterjee A, Samaddar DP, Chugh P. Comparative analysis of APACHE-II and P-POSSUM scoring systems in predicting postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. World J Clin Cases. 2019 Aug 26;7(16):2227-2237. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2227.
PMID: 31531317RESULT
Limitations and Caveats
Observational study. So no specific adverse effect because of the study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr.Deb Sanjay Nag
- Organization
- Tata Main Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ankur Dembla, DA
Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, India
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2015
First Posted
June 15, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 15, 2019
Results First Posted
June 27, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share