Trial of Advance Care Planning (ACP) & Goals of Care Designations (GCD) Discussions
Effectiveness and Economic Impact of Advance Care Planning and Goals of Care Designations Discussions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
15
Brief Summary
The Canadian population is aging and more people are living with advanced chronic diseases. At the end of life (EOL), the use of invasive medical treatments in hospitals is increasing and associated with worse outcomes. Advance Care Planning (ACP) may help improve care at EOL to be the way patients want it. ACP is a process where people think about the various options related to future health care decisions and they may communicate with a verbal or written plan of what care they would want in the EOL. Also, they may nominate a substitute decision maker if they become unable to speak for themselves. A national poll found that few Canadians have thought about or made an ACP. Alberta Health Services has developed two videos (Videos) to help with decision making about ACP and goals of care designations(GCD). GCD are medical orders of care that (a) serve as a communication tool for HCP to assist in rapid decision making; and (b) guide HCP and patients regarding the general intent and locations of care, and interventions that are to be provided. This study will compare ACP behaviours and GCD preferences for participants who have seen the Videos with those who have not and measure the change in those behaviours and preferences at 1, 2 and 3 months. It will also look at the impact of the Videos on health care costs and service use. Participants from five patient groups (metastatic lung cancer, colorectal cancer, gynecological cancer, renal failure, and heart failure) were selected as representative of where ACP should ideally be occurring, and where data on ACP implementation is presently most lacking, and as venues in which this research is most feasible. Collecting information about patients' ACP and GCD preferences may help improve AHS decision making tools and more generally help healthcare leaders plan ways to better engage patients in the ACP process.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 28, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedMay 9, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.4 years
May 28, 2015
May 5, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Video effectiveness measured by change from baseline in number of participants who have had a conversation with a health care provider about ACP or GCD to 1 month, 2 months and 3 months
Determine the effectiveness of the Videos by comparing the number of participants who have had a conversation with a health care provider about ACP or GCD between two groups (those who receive the intervention (usual care) and those who watch the videos
1 month, 2 months and 3 months
Economic impact of Videos measured by comparing change from 12 months prior to baseline in health care costs to baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 12 months after baseline between two groups
Determine the cost and economic consequences of the Videos by comparing change in health care costs between two groups (those who receive no intervention (usual care) and those who watch the Videos)
12 months prior to baseline, baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 12 months after baseline
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThis group will receive "usual care" which is to receive no intervention.
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive the intervention which is two Conversations Matter videos about Advance Care Planning and Goals of Care Designations respectively
Interventions
2 videos about Advance Care Planning and Goals of Care Designations respectively. These 2 videos were developed by Alberta Health Services and are each 8 minutes long.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of either:
- heart failure classified as Class III or IV based on New York Heart Association Functional Classification or classified as Stage D based on American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Heart Failure Classification;
- renal failure and on dialysis; or
- metastatic lung, gastrointestinal (including pancreatic) or gynecological cancer and on chemo, radiation therapy or palliative
- or over
- able to communicate in English
- reside within 100 km of Edmonton or Calgary
- owns a phone
You may not qualify if:
- cognitive impairment which would impact ability to give informed consent
- in crisis
- first visit or in the case of renal patients, in the first month of dialysis
- participated in ACP pilot study
- visual and/or hearing impairment that would impact their ability to see and/or hear the Videos, and/or complete the assessments including the telephone follow-up interviews.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Albertalead
- University of Calgarycollaborator
Study Sites (15)
Peter Lougheed Centre: Heart Function Clinic
Calgary, Alberta, T1Y 6J4, Canada
Sunridge Dialysis Unit: Hemodialysis
Calgary, Alberta, T1Y 7M8, Canada
Southern Alberta Renal Program - Northlands Village Mall, Hemodialysis
Calgary, Alberta, T2L 2J8, Canada
Foothills Medical Centre: Heart Function and Heart Transplant Clinic
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2, Canada
Sheldon M. Chumir Health Centre: Hemodialysis
Calgary, Alberta, T2R 0X7, Canada
Rockyview General Hospital: Heart Function Clinic
Calgary, Alberta, T2V 1P9, Canada
South Calgary Health Centre: Hemodialysis
Calgary, Alberta, T2X 3W5, Canada
South Health Campus: Heart Function Clinic
Calgary, Alberta, T3M 1M4, Canada
Royal Alexandra Hospital: Renal Insufficiency Clinic and Hemodialysis Unit
Edmonton, Alberta, T5H3V9, Canada
Edmonton General Continuing Care Centre: Hemodialysis
Edmonton, Alberta, T5K 0L4, Canada
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada
Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
University of Alberta Hospital: Renal Insufficiency Clinic and Hemodialysis Units
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2B7, Canada
Grey Nuns Community Hospital: Renal Insufficiency Clinic and Hemodialysis Unit
Edmonton, Alberta, T6L 5X8, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Douglas ML, Simon J, Davison SN, Biondo P, Ghosh S, Kassam A, Fassbender K. Efficacy of Advance Care Planning Videos for Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Cancer, Heart, and Kidney Failure Outpatient Settings. Med Decis Making. 2021 Apr;41(3):292-304. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20985836. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
PMID: 33451263DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Konrad Fassbender, PhD
University of Alberta
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sara Davison, MD, MHSc (Bioethics)
University of Alberta
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jessica Simon, MD
University of Calgary
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2015
First Posted
June 4, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05