NCT05625906

Brief Summary

The aims of this study are to examine the effectiveness of a multi-media experiential training programme in advance care planning (ACP) for nursing staff in acute care settings. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • can the programme enhance nurses' decision-support skills
  • can the programme strengthen nurses' knowledge and confidence, and improve their attitude toward ACP? Researchers will compare the participants in the intervention group (receive training programme) with those who are in the control group (receive no intervention) to evaluate the effectiveness of the programme.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
230

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

8 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 6, 2022

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 23, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2023

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 14, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

November 6, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Advance Care Planningacute care settingsexperiential learningnurse training programme

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Nurse's decision support skills as assessed by the Brief Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT10)

    DSAT10 instrument is an observational feedback tool for evaluating decisional support interactions between health care workers and patients. The DSAT-10 includes 16 items divided into five domains of: Decision-Making Status; Knowledge of Options, Risks, and Benefits; Values Associated with Outcomes of Options. Scores range from zero to ten, with higher scores indicating more decisional support being verbalized during the patient-provider interaction.

    Baseline

  • Nurse's decision support skills as assessed by the Brief Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT10)

    DSAT10 instrument is an observational feedback tool for evaluating decisional support interactions between health care workers and patients. The DSAT-10 includes 16 items divided into five domains of: Decision-Making Status; Knowledge of Options, Risks, and Benefits; Values Associated with Outcomes of Options. Scores range from zero to ten, with higher scores indicating more decisional support being verbalized during the patient-provider interaction.

    immediate post-intervention

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Nurses' attitudes towards Advance Care Planning

    Baseline

  • Nurses' attitudes towards Advance Care Planning

    immediate post-intervention

  • Nurses' attitudes towards Advance Care Planning

    12 weeks post-intervention

  • Nurses' knowledge of Advance Care Planning

    Baseline

  • Nurses' knowledge of Advance Care Planning

    immediate post-intervention

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

will receive a multi-media experiential training programme.

Other: Multi-media experiential training programme

control group

NO INTERVENTION

will NOT receive a multi-media experiential training programme

Interventions

1. Webpage and mobile applications of training material on ACP, to be offered four weeks before the workshop 2. A three-hour multimedia workshop (8-10 nurses per group) including enhanced lectures and a role play encounter with standardised patients. Immediate feedback on their quality of decision support skills will be given. The workshops will be delivered by an experienced advance practice nurse with a palliative care specialty. 3. Writing a reflective journal after the role play with standardised patients

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • registered nurse with at least two years' clinical experience

You may not qualify if:

  • had prior specialty training in Advance Care Planning communication.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

United Christian Hospital

Kwun Tong, Hong Kong

Location

Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Mong Kok, Hong Kong

Location

Prince of Wales Hospital

Shatin, Hong Kong

Location

Shatin cheshire home

Shatin, Hong Kong

Location

Shatin Hospital

Shatin, Hong Kong

Location

Haven of Hope Hospital

Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong

Location

Tuen Mun Hospital

Tuenmen, Hong Kong

Location

Grantham Hospital

Wong Chuk Hang, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Putman-Casdorph H, Drenning C, Richards S, Messenger K. Advance directives: evaluation of nurses' knowledge, attitude, confidence, and experience. J Nurs Care Qual. 2009 Jul-Sep;24(3):250-6. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e318194fd69.

    PMID: 19525766BACKGROUND
  • Siu MW, Cheung TY, Chiu MM, Kwok TY, Choi WL, Lo TK, Ting WM, Yu PH, Cheung CY, Wong JG, Shua SE. The preparedness of Hong Kong medical students towards advance directives and end-of-life issues. East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;20(4):155-62.

    PMID: 22348923BACKGROUND
  • So WKW, Kwong ANL, Chen JMT, Chan JCY, Law BMH, Sit JWH, Chan CWH. A Theory-Based and Culturally Aligned Training Program on Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention for South Asian Community Health Workers: A Feasibility Study. Cancer Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;42(2):E20-E30. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000543.

    PMID: 28945633BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Carmen Chan Yip Wing-han

    Chinese University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2022

First Posted

November 23, 2022

Study Start

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

December 31, 2024

Last Updated

April 14, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations