NCT02459327

Brief Summary

This study tests a comprehensive approach to the promotion of school readiness in low-income families, beginning shortly after the birth of the child, through enhancement of positive parenting practices (and when present, reduction of psychosocial stressors) within the pediatric primary care platform. The investigators do so by integrating two evidence-based interventions: 1) a universal primary prevention strategy (Video Interaction Project \[VIP\]); and 2) a targeted secondary/tertiary prevention strategy (Family Check-up \[FCU\]) for families with infants/toddlers identified as having additional risks. VIP provides parents with a developmental specialist who videotapes the parent and child and coaches the parent on effective parenting practices at each pediatric primary care visit. FCU is a home-based, family-centered intervention that utilizes an initial ecologically-focused assessment to promote motivation for parents to change child-rearing behaviors, with follow-up sessions on parenting and factors that compromise parenting quality. Two primary care settings serving low-income communities in New York City, NY and Pittsburgh, PA will be utilized to test this integrated intervention in hospital-based clinics, providing information about translation across venues where one of the two interventions has been previously used alone. The investigators plan to test the VIP/FCU model in a randomized trial of 400 families utilizing parent surveys, observational data on parent-child interactions, and direct assessments of children's development, at key points during intervention follow-up. Analyses will address questions of program impact for the integrated program across all families and by key subgroups. The largest single contribution made by this study is to test whether an integrated primary and secondary/tertiary prevention strategy implemented in pediatric primary care can produce impacts on early school readiness outcomes, including social-emotional, pre-academic, and self-regulation. As such, this study has the potential to provide the scientific and practice communities with information about an innovative approach to promoting school readiness skills among low-income children.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
403

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 26, 2015

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 2, 2015

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 3, 2015

Completed
9.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 9, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 9, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

October 16, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9.9 years

First QC Date

May 26, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 14, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Infant behaviorChild behaviorParentingChild rearingDepressionPersonal satisfactionRandomized controlled trialsIntervention studiesBehavioral symptomsSocial behavior

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Caregiver's cognitive stimulation

    Caregiver's reports of cognitive stimulation. For example engagement in reading, teaching, and play (e.g., StimQ, Dreyer, Mendelsohn, \& Tamis-LeMonda, 1995; Mendelsohn, Dreyer, \& Tamis-LeMonda, 1999)

    When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  • Caregiver's harsh parenting and discipline

    Caregiver's reports of discipline strategies (e.g., Socolar et al., 2004; Incredible Years, Webster-Stratton, 2001; Steele et al., 2005)

    When the child is 18 months - 6 years old

  • Caregiver-child interaction quality

    Caregiver's reports and coded videotaped interactions between caregivers and children (e.g., Parenting Young Children, PARYC; McEachern et al., 2011)

    When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  • Quality of the home environment

    Observer reports of the home environment (e.g., HOME inventory: Infant-Toddler (IT), Bradley \& Caldwell, 1984)

    When the child is 18 months old

  • Caregiver depression

    Caregiver's reports of depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Cox, Holden \& Sagovsky, 1987; Cox, Chapman, Declan \& Jones, 1995)

    When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  • Caregiver stress/ support

    Caregiver's reports of stress, support, and perceptions of daily hassles (e.g., Abidin Parenting Stress Index, Abidin, 1990; General Life Satisfaction Questionnaire, Crnic, 1983; Parenting Daily Hassle scale, Crnic \& Greenberg, 1990; Concern for Children scale, Vines \& Baird, 2009)

    When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  • Child prosocial and problem behavior

    Caregiver's reports of their child's behavioral problems, including externalizing and internalizing problems and prosocial behavior and social skills (e.g., Child Behavior Checklist; Achenbach \& Rescorla, 2000; BASC-3, Altmann et al., 2017; Infant-Toddler Social Emotional Assessment, ITSEA, Carter \& Briggs-Gowan, 1993; Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment, BITSEA, Briggs-Gowan \& Carter, 2006; Positive Behavior Scale, Epps et al., 2003)

    When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  • Children's early language skills

    Caregiver report of non-verbal communication and early expressive language (e.g., MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory; CDI, Fenson et al., 2008; Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scale, CSBS, Wetherby et al., 2001)

    When the child is 6 months - 2 years old

  • Child achievement

    Direct assessment of children's achievement, including receptive language skills, early academic skills including, reading, math, and writing as well as oral language abilities and academic knowledge (e.g., Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Tests; ROWPVT, Martin and Brownell, 2010; Woodcock Johnson-IV Letter-Word Identification, Applied Problems and Oral Language Comprehension (WJ-IV)/ Bateria III Woodcock-Munoz, Muñoz-Sandoval et al., 2007; McGrew et al., 2014; Test of Word Reading Eficiency (TOWRE), Tarar et al., 2015)

    When the child is 4 years old - 6 years old

  • Child executive functioning skills

    Direct assessment of children's executive functioning, including cognitive skills, inhibitory control, and effortful control (e.g., Dimensional Change Card Sort, DCCS, Zelazo, 2006; Walk a Line, Cookie Waiting, Kochanska et al., 2000)

    When the child is 4 years old - 6 years old

  • Caregiver-child relationship quality

    Caregiver's reports of relationship quality, including the caregiver's perception of conflict and warmth/openness in relationship with the child (e.g., Adult Child Relationship Scale, Pianta \& Steinberg, 1991)

    When the child is 4 years old - 6 years old

  • Children's self-regulation

    Observer reports of children's attention/emotional regulation during the direct assessment (e.g., Preschool Self-Regulation Interviewer Assessment, PSRA, Smith-Donald et al., 2007; Moffit Scale, Caspi et al., 1995)

    When the child is 4 years old - 6 years old

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Parenting Quality

    Time Frame: When the child is 2 - 4 years old

  • Child temperament

    When the child is 6 months, 4 years old, 6 years old

  • Special services

    When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  • Basic child health

    When the child is 6 months - 6 years old

  • Caregiver-child relationship quality

    When the child is 18 months - 2 years old

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

VIP/FCU

EXPERIMENTAL

VIP (Video Interaction Project) will be offered to all families assigned to the treatment group. FCU (Family Check Up) will be offered to families identified as high risk within the treatment group. Both treatments are parenting interventions.

Behavioral: Video Interaction ProjectBehavioral: Family Check Up

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

VIP utilizes pediatric well-child visits to build a relationship with an interventionist who facilitates self-reflection regarding interactions with the child through review of videotapes of the parent and child made that day and further facilitates interactions through provision of learning materials (toys and books).

Also known as: VIP
VIP/FCU
Family Check UpBEHAVIORAL

FCU utilizes home visitation to build a relationship with an interventionist who assesses family strengths and challenges and uses motivational interviewing and evidence-based family management strategies to support parent and child behavioral change.

Also known as: FCU
VIP/FCU

Eligibility Criteria

Age0 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Baby is getting pediatric care at Bellevue Hospital Center or Pittsburgh Children's Hospital
  • Caregiver primary language is English or Spanish
  • Family can be contacted (has a working phone)
  • Family attended second (follow-up) meeting with study team between when the child was aged 10days and 6weeks old

You may not qualify if:

  • Birth weight \<2500gm
  • Gestational age \< 37 weeks
  • Not singleton birth (twin, triplet, etc.)
  • Known or suspected significant genetic abnormality
  • Known neurodevelopmental/neuromuscular disorder likely to affect development, movement, e.g., seizure disorder, microcephaly (low head circumference)
  • Known sensory defect
  • Known significant malformation likely to affect development or likely to require significant therapy
  • Meets criteria for Early Intervention at birth
  • Not in level I nursery at time of enrollment
  • Significant postnatal complication requiring level II or III nursery stay. Examples: sepsis, significant hypoglycemia, seizures
  • Mother with known significant impairment that will be barrier to communication and participation (e.g., intellectual disability, schizophrenia)
  • Baby not being discharged to mother or father
  • Mother and baby will be staying in shelter
  • Not planning to stay in NYC/ Pittsburgh for at least 3 years
  • Has previously participated in VIP or FCU projects
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Bellevue Hospital Center

New York, New York, 11211, United States

Location

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Mendelsohn AL, Dreyer BP, Flynn V, Tomopoulos S, Rovira I, Tineo W, Pebenito C, Torres C, Torres H, Nixon AF. Use of videotaped interactions during pediatric well-child care to promote child development: a randomized, controlled trial. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005 Feb;26(1):34-41.

    PMID: 15718881BACKGROUND
  • Shaw DS, Dishion TJ, Supplee L, Gardner F, Arnds K. Randomized trial of a family-centered approach to the prevention of early conduct problems: 2-year effects of the family check-up in early childhood. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Feb;74(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.1.1.

    PMID: 16551138BACKGROUND
  • Dishion TJ, Shaw D, Connell A, Gardner F, Weaver C, Wilson M. The family check-up with high-risk indigent families: preventing problem behavior by increasing parents' positive behavior support in early childhood. Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1395-414. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01195.x.

    PMID: 18826532BACKGROUND
  • Mendelsohn AL, Huberman HS, Berkule SB, Brockmeyer CA, Morrow LM, Dreyer BP. Primary care strategies for promoting parent-child interactions and school readiness in at-risk families: the Bellevue Project for Early Language, Literacy, and Education Success. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Jan;165(1):33-41. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.254.

    PMID: 21199978BACKGROUND
  • Roby E, Miller EB, Canfield CF, Shaw DS, Morris-Perez PA, Mendelsohn AL. Supporting Early Social-Emotional Competencies Through Reading and Play: Findings From an RCT of the Tiered Smart Beginnings Program. Soc Dev. 2025 Nov;34(4):e70024. doi: 10.1111/sode.70024. Epub 2025 Sep 14.

  • Miller EB, Roby E, Zhang Y, Coskun L, Rosas JM, Scott MA, Gutierrez J, Shaw DS, Mendelsohn AL, Morris-Perez PA. Promoting Cognitive Stimulation in Parents Across Infancy and Toddlerhood: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pediatr. 2023 Apr;255:159-165.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Dec 5.

  • Reno R, Whipps M, Wallenborn JT, Demirci J, Bogen DL, Gross RS, Mendelsohn AL, Morris PA, Shaw DS. Housing Insecurity, Housing Conditions, and Breastfeeding Behaviors for Medicaid-Eligible Families in Urban Settings. J Hum Lact. 2022 Nov;38(4):760-770. doi: 10.1177/08903344221108073. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

  • Roby E, Miller EB, Shaw DS, Morris P, Gill A, Bogen DL, Rosas J, Canfield CF, Hails KA, Wippick H, Honoroff J, Cates CB, Weisleder A, Chadwick KA, Raak CD, Mendelsohn AL. Improving Parent-Child Interactions in Pediatric Health Care: A Two-Site Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics. 2021 Mar;147(3):e20201799. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1799.

  • Canfield CF, Miller EB, Shaw DS, Morris P, Alonso A, Mendelsohn AL. Beyond language: Impacts of shared reading on parenting stress and early parent-child relational health. Dev Psychol. 2020 Jul;56(7):1305-1315. doi: 10.1037/dev0000940. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Infant BehaviorChild BehaviorDepressionPersonal SatisfactionBehavioral SymptomsSocial Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

  • Pamela Morris, Ph.D

    New York University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Alan Mendelsohn, MD

    NYU Langone Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Daniel Shaw, Ph.D

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2015

First Posted

June 2, 2015

Study Start

June 3, 2015

Primary Completion

May 9, 2025

Study Completion

May 9, 2025

Last Updated

October 16, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations