Drug Coated Balloon Compared to Bare Metal Stent for de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
Randomized Controlled Trial of Drug Coated Balloon Compared to Bare Metal Stent Using FFR-guidance for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized trial will assess the efficacy of Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) compared to Bare Metal Stent (BMS) using Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) guidance for de novo coronary artery lesions in patients unable to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy and at high risk of bleeding. Patients will be randomized after balloon angioplasty to receive either DCB or BMS. Endpoints are late luminal loss at 9 months, and major adverse cardiac events including arterial thrombosis at 1, 9 and 12 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedApril 3, 2019
April 1, 2019
1.5 years
May 18, 2015
April 2, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Late luminal loss
9 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, recurrent ischemic symptoms)
Post procedure (up to 1 hour), 1 month, 9 months and 12 months
Arterial thrombosis
Post procedure (up to 1 hour), 1 month, 9 months and 12 months
Fractional Flow Reserve
Post procedure (up to 1 hour) and 9 months
Study Arms (2)
Drug Coated Balloon
EXPERIMENTALPCB (SeQuent Please®, paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter, B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany)
Bare Metal Stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORBMS (Vision®)
Interventions
If post balloon angioplasty FFR is more than 0.80, either DCB treatment or BMS implantation will be carried out based on randomization of 1:1. DCB (SeQuent Please paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter, B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) will be applied at the predilated lesions. PCB will be delivered rapidly and inflated for 60 seconds with nominal pressure.
BMS (Vision®) will be applied at the predilated lesions after angiographic confirmation of the target lesion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stable Angina and Unstable angina
- single de novo coronary artery lesions in a single vessel with \> 50% diameter stenosis with a reference diameter \> 2.75mm
- Unexplained anemia
- Atrial fibrillation with CHADSVASC \> or equal to 1
- Patients awaiting for non cardiac surgery within a year
- History of massive hemorrhage requiring transfusion
- History of upper GI bleeding
- Malignancy
- Poor compliance with medication
You may not qualify if:
- STEMI/NSTEMI within the preceding 72 hours
- Multivessel disease, chronic total occlusion, long lesions and left main disease
- heart failure with ejection fraction \< 35% and/or cardiogenic shock
- Previous history of or planned coronary artery bypass grafting
- life expectancy of less than 1 year
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ulsan University Hospitallead
- Seoul National University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ulsan University Hospital
Ulsan, 682-714, South Korea
Related Publications (8)
Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M, Colombo A, Schuler G, Barragan P, Guagliumi G, Molnar F, Falotico R; RAVEL Study Group. Randomized Study with the Sirolimus-Coated Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients with de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 6;346(23):1773-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012843.
PMID: 12050336BACKGROUNDMoses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Holmes DR, O'Shaughnessy C, Caputo RP, Kereiakes DJ, Williams DO, Teirstein PS, Jaeger JL, Kuntz RE; SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 2;349(14):1315-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035071.
PMID: 14523139BACKGROUNDJoner M, Finn AV, Farb A, Mont EK, Kolodgie FD, Ladich E, Kutys R, Skorija K, Gold HK, Virmani R. Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jul 4;48(1):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.042. Epub 2006 May 5.
PMID: 16814667BACKGROUNDNakazawa G, Vorpahl M, Finn AV, Narula J, Virmani R. One step forward and two steps back with drug-eluting-stents: from preventing restenosis to causing late thrombosis and nouveau atherosclerosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 May;2(5):625-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.01.011. No abstract available.
PMID: 19442951BACKGROUNDUnverdorben M, Kleber FX, Heuer H, Figulla HR, Vallbracht C, Leschke M, Cremers B, Hardt S, Buerke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Degenhardt R, Scheller B. Treatment of small coronary arteries with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in the PEPCAD I study: are lesions clinically stable from 12 to 36 months? EuroIntervention. 2013 Sep;9(5):620-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I5A99.
PMID: 24058078BACKGROUNDScheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Paclitaxel balloon coating, a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation. 2004 Aug 17;110(7):810-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138929.71660.E0. Epub 2004 Aug 9.
PMID: 15302790BACKGROUNDBech GJ, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels KH, Michels HR, Bonnier HJ, Koolen JJ. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve to predict clinical outcome after balloon angioplasty. Circulation. 1999 Feb 23;99(7):883-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.7.883.
PMID: 10027810BACKGROUNDShin ES, Lee JM, Her AY, Chung JH, Eun Lee K, Garg S, Nam CW, Doh JH, Koo BK. Prospective randomized trial of paclitaxel-coated balloon versus bare-metal stent in high bleeding risk patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. Coron Artery Dis. 2019 Sep;30(6):425-431. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000755.
PMID: 31009399DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eun-Seok Shin, M.D., PhD.
Ulsan University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Interventional Cardiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2015
First Posted
May 28, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 3, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04