Esophagectomy in Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer Patients Through Left Versus Right Transthoracic Approach
Randomized Control Study on Surgical Treatment for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer Patients Without Upper Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis Through Left Versus Right Transthoracic Approach
1 other identifier
interventional
800
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Esophageal carcinoma is an aggressive malignant disease with poor prognosis. Surgical resection remains the most effective method for this malignancy. Although different approaches have been studied for the surgical resection of thoracic esophageal cancer, little evidence has been achieved due to lack of large scale multicenter randomized trials with regard to this issue: whether left transthoracic approach or right transthoracic approach is the optimal surgical approach for treating middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer without upper mediastinal lymph node metastasis. The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative local recurrence rate and long-term outcome of esophagectomy through left and right transthoracic approach in the middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer patients without preoperative upper mediastinal lymph node metastasis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jan 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedMay 20, 2015
May 1, 2015
2.9 years
May 8, 2015
May 17, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Long term survival
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Disease free survival
5 years
Degree of lymph node dissection
3 years
Postoperative complications
3 years
Study Arms (2)
Left thoracotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATOREsophagectomy through left side transthoracic approach, with esophagogastric anastomosis above aortic arch and two-field lymphadenectomy (thoracic and abdominal lymph node)
Right thoracotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATOREsophagectomy through right side transthoracic approach, with esophagogastric anastomosis above azygos vain arch or on the top of chest cavity and two-field lymphadenectomy (thoracic and abdominal lymph node)
Interventions
Transthoracic approach is the surgical procedure including the open and minimally invasive thoracotomy.
Transthoracic approach is the surgical procedure including the open and minimally invasive thoracotomy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with histologically proved squamous cell esophageal cancer without any previous anti-tumor therapy;
- The preoperative clinical TNM stage: cT1b-3N0-1M0;
- Adequate function of heart, lung, liver, brain and kidney, which can tolerate esophagectomy either through left or right thoracotomy;
- Without any preoperative distant metastases confirmed by preoperative examination such as chest and abdominal CT, brain MRI and bone scan or PET-CT;
- No evidence showing suspicious upper mediastinal lymph node metastasis (short diameter of LN \<0.8cm or shortest diameter / longest diameter \<0.65) by the thoracic and abdominal CT and endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS).
- Willing to participate the clinical trial and sign informed consent before being enrolled into clinical trail.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-squamous cell esophageal carcinoma or has any previous anti-cancer therapy before surgery;
- The preoperative clinical TNM stage reaches: N2-3 or M1;
- Inadequate cardiopulmonary, liver, brain and kidney function for tolerating the esophagectomy ;
- Previous history of malignancy;
- Unwilling to participate the clinical trial and refuse to sign informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chinese Academy of Medical Scienceslead
- Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institutecollaborator
- Henan Cancer Hospitalcollaborator
- Hebei Medical University Fourth Hospitalcollaborator
- Harbin Medical Universitycollaborator
- Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institutecollaborator
- Hunan Cancer Hospitalcollaborator
- Sun Yat-sen Universitycollaborator
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospitalcollaborator
- Tongji Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cancer hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100021, China
Related Publications (1)
Mao YS, Gao SG, Li Y, Hao AL, Liu JF, Li XF, Rong TH, Fu JH, Ma JQ, Xu MQ, Zhang RQ, Xiao GM, Fu XN, Chen KN, Mao WM, Liu YY, Liu HX, Zhang ZR, Fang Y, Fu DH, Wei XD, Yuan LG, Muhammad S, Wei WQ, Chiu PW, Lloyd S, Schlottmann F, Meredith K, Pimiento JM, Gao YB, He J. Efficacy and safety of esophagectomy via left thoracic approach versus via right thoracic approach for middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a multicenter randomized clinical trial (NST1501). Ann Transl Med. 2022 Aug;10(16):904. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3810.
PMID: 36111056DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- President
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2015
First Posted
May 20, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
May 20, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05