Trial of Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam on Mortality and Clinial Response
MERINO II
Pilot RCT of Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC Beta-lactamase Producing Enterobacter Spp., Citrobacter Freundii, Morganella Morganii, Providencia Spp. or Serratia Marcescens. in Low-risk Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
100
2 countries
6
Brief Summary
Infections of the blood are extremely serious and require intravenous antibiotic treatment. When the infection results from antibiotic resistant bacteria, the choice of antibiotic is an extremely important decision. Some types of bacteria produce enzymes that may inactivate essential antibiotics, related to penicillin, called 'beta-lactams'. Furthermore high level production of these enzymes can occur during therapy and lead to clinical failure, even when an antibiotic appears effective by laboratory testing. However, this risk of this occurring in clinical practice has only been well described in a limited range of antibiotic classes in a type of bacteria called Enterobacter. There is currently uncertainty as to whether a commonly used, and highly effective antibiotic, called piperacillin-tazobactam is subject to the same risk of resistance developing while on treatment. Infections caused by Enterobacter (and other bacteria with similar resistance mechanisms) are often treated with an alternative drug called meropenem (a carbapenem antibiotic), which is effective but has an extremely broad-spectrum of activity. Excessive use of carbapenems is driving further resistance to this antibiotic class - which represent our 'lastline' of antibiotic defence. As such, we need studies to help us see whether alternatives to meropenem are an effective and safe choice. No study has ever directly tested whether these two antibiotics have the same effectiveness for this type of infection. The purpose of this study is to randomly assign patients with blood infection caused by Enterobacter or related bacteria to either meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam in order to test whether these antibiotics have similar effectiveness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Apr 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_4
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedMay 10, 2023
May 1, 2023
5.8 years
April 20, 2015
May 9, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical and microbiological outcomes post bloodstream infection of patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem.
Composite end-point of: Death: up to 30 days post randomisation. Clinical failure - defined as ongoing fever (Tmax \>=38.0oC) OR leucocytosis (white blood cell count \>12x109/L) - assessed on day 5 post randomisation. Microbiological failure - defined as positive blood culture or any sterile site specimen with same species as initial (index) blood culture on day 3-5. Microbiological relapse - defined as growth from any sterile site of the same organism as in the original blood culture after day 5 but before day 30; If any of the above criteria are fulfilled post randomisation, the composite end-point has occurred. A composite end-point has been used as overall mortality is expected to be low in this subset of patients screened for 'low-risk' infections, and so is unlikely to be a useful primary outcome measure in isolation.
Composite end point; up to day 30.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Time to clinical resolution of infection.
Resolution of infection will be monitored from day of randomisation up to study day five or when the patient exhibits a temperature below 38 degrees celcius.
Clinical and microbiological success day 5.
Day five.
Length of hospital and/or ICU stay post randomisation.
Participants will be followed for the duration of their hospitalisation and/or up to the thirty day study time period.
Requirement for ICU admission: if not in ICU at the time of enrolment, during days 1 to 5 post-randomisation.
Days 1-5.
Infection with a piperacillin-tazobactam / carbapenem resistant organism or Clostridium difficile.
Days 5-30.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Meropenem
ACTIVE COMPARATORMeropenem 1g every 8 hrs IV to day 4
Piperacillin-tazobactam combination product
EXPERIMENTALPiperacillin tazobactam 4.5g every 6 hrs IV to day 4
Interventions
Meropenem is a carbapenem anti-bacterial used for the treatment of serious infections in patients.
Piperacillin-tazobactam is used for the treatment of patients with systemic and/or local bacterial infections.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bloodstream infection with Enterobacter spp., Serratia marcescens, Providencia spp., Morganella morganii or Citrobacter freundii (i.e. likely AmpC-producer), and susceptibility to 3rd generation cephalosporins (i.e. ceftriaxone, cefotaxime or ceftazidime), meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam from at least one blood culture draw. This will be determined in accordance with laboratory methods and susceptibility breakpoints defined by protocols used in the recruiting site laboratories..
- No more than 72 hours has elapsed since the first positive blood culture collection.
- Patient is aged 18 years and over (\>=21y in Singapore).
You may not qualify if:
- Patient not expected to survive more than 4 days
- Patient allergic to a penicillin or a carbapenem
- Patient with significant polymicrobial bacteraemia (that is, a Gram positive skin contaminant in one set of blood cultures is not regarded as significant polymicrobial bacteraemia).
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
- Use of concomitant antimicrobials in the first 4 days after enrolment with known activity against Gram-negative bacilli (except trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole may be continued as Pneumocystis prophylaxis).
- Severe acute illness as defined by Pitt bacteraemia score of \>4
- Likely source to be from (proven or suspected at the time of randomisation) the central nervous system, e.g. brain abscess, post-surgical meningitis, shunt infection (due to concerns over CNS penetration of piperacillin/tazobactam)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
John Hunter Hospital
New Lambton, New South Wales, 2305, Australia
Wollongong Hospital
Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia
Royal Brisbane Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4170, Australia
National University Hospital Singapore
Singapore, Singapore
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore, Singapore
Related Publications (1)
Stewart AG, Paterson DL, Young B, Lye DC, Davis JS, Schneider K, Yilmaz M, Dinleyici R, Runnegar N, Henderson A, Archuleta S, Kalimuddin S, Forde BM, Chatfield MD, Bauer MJ, Lipman J, Harris-Brown T, Harris PNA; MERINO Trial Investigators and the Australasian Society for Infectious Disease Clinical Research Network (ASID-CRN). Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacter spp, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp, or Serratia marcescens: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MERINO-2). Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;8(8):ofab387. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab387. eCollection 2021 Aug.
PMID: 34395716DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Paterson, Professor
The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor David L. Paterson
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2015
First Posted
May 7, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
May 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05