A Multi Centre Study to Determine the Feasibility of Using an Integrated Consent Model to Compare Standard of Care Administration Schedules of G-CSF (Filgrastim) for Primary Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia in Early Stage Breast Cancer (React-G Study)
React-G
1 other identifier
observational
142
1 country
2
Brief Summary
In patients with early-stage breast cancer, chemotherapy has substantially improved survival rates for breast cancer patients. Improvements in outcomes, however, are compromised by the considerable toxicities associated with chemotherapy, most notable being neutropenia. Neutropenia is the presence of abnormally few white blood cells, leading to increased susceptibility to infection and can require hospitalization and need for intravenous antibiotics and is sometimes fatal. Febrile neutropenia can also be associated with treatment delays and dose reductions, potentially compromising treatment efficacy. Patients can receive medication to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia, such as Neupogen (Filgrastim) as a daily injection for 5, 7, or 10 days. Since there is genuine uncertainty amongst healthcare professionals as to which administration schedule of Neupogen is better, investigators are performing a randomized study in which patients are put into a group by chance to give participants one of three standards of Neupogen daily injection. Neupogen can cost approximately $200 per injection, so if a physician prescribes 10 days for 8 cycles of treatment this can cost $16,000 compared to a 5 day prescription which would cost half this. In addition to cost savings, many patients are not able to give themselves injections on a daily basis and require nursing resources which are utilized at high-cost. This study will use an "integrated consent model" that involves an "oral consent" rather than a written informed consenting process in order to increase the number of patients who may participate while performing a study at a lower cost. While determining the optimal treatment will improve patient comfort and acceptability, using the minimal safe duration of administration may also offer cost savings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2015
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 29, 2017
September 1, 2017
1.8 years
April 15, 2015
September 27, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility of performing this study will be measured with composite endpoints: physician engagement, time for local or provincial research ethics approval, accrual rates, and patient/physician compliance.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Rates of documented febrile neutropenia (laboratory confirmation)
1 year
ANC results at the end of each cycle of chemotherapy.
1 year
hospital admissions
1 year
percentage of patients who require chemotherapy dose delays
1 year
percentage of patients who require chemotherapy dose decrease
1 year
Study Arms (3)
5 days of filgrastim
Standard of care
7 days of filgrastim
Standard of care
10 days of filgrastim
Standard of care
Eligibility Criteria
Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, who will be receiving FEC-D, AC-D, dose dense AC-T, TC or TAC chemotherapy will be eligible.
You may qualify if:
- Histologically confirmed primary breast cancer
- Planned to start docetaxel component of FEC-D or AC-D, or first cycle of; dose-dense AC-T, TC, FEC-D or TAC chemotherapy
- ≥19 years of age
- Able to provide verbal consent
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to Filgrastim
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Clemons M, Fergusson D, Simos D, Mates M, Robinson A, Califaretti N, Zibdawi L, Bahl M, Raphael J, Ibrahim MFK, Fernandes R, Pitre L, Aseyev O, Stober C, Vandermeer L, Saunders D, Hutton B, Mallick R, Pond GR, Awan A, Hilton J. A multicentre, randomised trial comparing schedules of G-CSF (filgrastim) administration for primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(7):951-957. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
PMID: 32325257DERIVEDIbrahim MFK, Hilton J, Mazzarello S, Fergusson D, Hutton B, Robinson A, Califaretti N, Hsu T, Gertler S, Mates M, Stober C, Vandermeer L, Mallick R, Clemons M. A multi-center pragmatic, randomized, feasibility trial comparing standard of care schedules of filgrastim administration for primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Apr;168(2):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4604-y. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
PMID: 29214415DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Clemons, MD
The Ottawa Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2015
First Posted
April 28, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09