NCT02394808

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of two marketed silicone hydrogel contact lenses in an Indian population in the following areas: physiological characteristics, comfort characteristics and vision characteristics.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 16, 2015

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 20, 2015

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2015

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 19, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

June 19, 2018

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

March 16, 2015

Results QC Date

April 4, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 18, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Subjective Overall Comfort

    Subjective Overall Comfort was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Comfort scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response.

    11 days Post fit

  • Subjective Overall Quality of Vision

    Subjective Overall quality of Vision was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Comfort scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response.

    11 days post fit

Study Arms (2)

Test Lens 1

EXPERIMENTAL

senofilcon A (Approved contact lens material)

Device: senofilcon ADevice: lotrafilcon B

Test Lens 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

lotrafilcon B (Approved contact lens material)

Device: senofilcon ADevice: lotrafilcon B

Interventions

One fresh pair of contact lenses worn for 11 (+/-2) days, for a minimum of 6 hours per day

Test Lens 1Test Lens 2

One fresh pair of contact lenses worn for 11 (+/-2) days, for a minimum of 6 hours per day

Test Lens 1Test Lens 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 39 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • The subject must read, understand English, and sign the Statement of Informed Consent and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
  • The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
  • The subject must be 18 and less than 40 years of age.
  • The subject's corrected spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -1.00 to -5.00D in each eye with visual acuity of 20/25 provided study lenses in each eye.
  • The subject must have less than -1.00 D of cylindrical refraction.
  • The subject must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye.
  • The subject must be an adapted soft contact lens wearer in both eyes.
  • The subject must have normal eyes.

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently pregnant or lactating (subjects who become pregnant during the study will be discontinued)
  • Any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Any systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, or aphakia.
  • Any previous, or planned ocular or interocular surgery (e.g. radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.).
  • Any grade 3 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g. edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) on the FDA classification scale, any previous history or signs of a contact lens-related corneal inflammatory event (e.g. past peripheral ulcer, or round peripheral scar), or any other ocular abnormality that may contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • Any ocular infections
  • Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.
  • Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 7 days prior to study enrollment
  • History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus.
  • Any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or a contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV) by self report.
  • Employee of the investigational clinic (e.g. investigator, Coordinator, Technician)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Unknown Facility

Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600006, India

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Tawnya Wilson O.D. SR. MANAGER GLOBAL CLINICAL SALES EDU
Organization
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2015

First Posted

March 20, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

September 1, 2015

Study Completion

September 1, 2015

Last Updated

June 19, 2018

Results First Posted

June 19, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Locations