Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs. Novel Anticoagulation Agents in Atrial Fibrillation
PRAGUE-17
Interventional Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs. Novel Anticoagulation Agents in High-risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (PRAGUE-17 Study)
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a prevalence of 1-2%. Without antithrombotic treatment, the annual risk of a cardioembolic event is 5-6%. The source of a cardioembolic event is a thrombus, which usually forms in the left atrial appendage (LAA). The prevention of cardioembolic events involves treatment with anticoagulant drugs, which were limited to, until recently, vitamin K antagonists (e.g. warfarin). Anticoagulant treatment with warfarin can lead to adverse bleeding events, some of which can be life threatening. Recently, two new options for thrombus prevention have been developed. The first is the novel anticoagulants (NOAC), which were associated with slightly better safety profiles due to a lower frequency of intracranial bleeding in large randomized trials . The second option involves interventional occlusion of the LAA. The aim of this project is to compare the LAA occlusion intervention to NOAC pharmacological treatment in a randomized multicenter study of AF patients at high risk of a cardioembolic event.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 atrial-fibrillation
Started Oct 2015
Typical duration for phase_4 atrial-fibrillation
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 13, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2019
CompletedJune 11, 2021
June 1, 2021
3.8 years
April 16, 2015
June 9, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Combined endpoint: stroke OR systemic cardioembolic event OR clinically significant bleeding OR cardiovascular death OR procedure or device-related complications
The primary endpoint is the combination of stroke, other systemic cardiovascular event, clinically significant ISTH major or non-major bleeding (ISTH major: a decrease in hemoglobin level of 20 g/l or more over a 24-hour period, transfusion of 2 or more units of packed red cells, bleeding at a critical site (intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, pericardial, intramuscular with compartment syndrome, or retroperitoneal), or fatal bleeding; ISTH non-major: requiring hospitalization or invasive procedure, which doesn´t meet the ISTH major criteria), cardiovascular death or procedure or device-related complications (i.e. a pericardial effusion with a need for drainage, surgical or pericardiocentesis; cardioembolic event during the procedure; significant periprocedural bleeding (such as major vascular bleeding with a need for surgical revision, or blood concentrate transfusion); device embolization, or thrombus of the device with a consequent cardioembolic event).
From the date of randomization until the date of 6 month follow-up visit of the last enrolled patient
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Stroke
From the date of randomization until the date of 6 month follow-up visit of the last enrolled patient
Systemic cardioembolic event
From the date of randomization until the date of 6 month follow-up visit of the last enrolled patient
Clinically significant bleeding (ISTH major)
From the date of randomization until the date of 6 month follow-up visit of the last enrolled patient
Cardiovascular death
From the date of randomization until the date of 6 month follow-up visit of the last enrolled patient
An procedure or device-related complications
Within 6 months after the procedure
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LAAO group
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be treated interventionally by left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). LAAO will be done using Amulet or Watchman device.
NOAC group
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be treated by novel anticoagulants (NOAC).
Interventions
The patients will be treated by interventional closure of the left atrial appendage.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- history of significant bleeding (i.e. bleeding which required intervention or hospitalization), even in the absence of anticoagulation treatment at the time of the bleeding event, or
- a cardioembolic event, which occurred on anticoagulation, or
- a high risk profile of the patient, defined as a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 3 and a HAS-BLED score ≥ 2
You may not qualify if:
- thrombus in the LA or LAA;
- mechanical valve prosthesis;
- mitral stenosis;
- previous LAA ligation during cardiac surgery;
- life expectancy less than 2 years;
- comorbidities other than AF, which present an indication for anticoagulation;
- patent foramen ovale with atrial septal aneurysm
- mobile plaque in the aorta;
- symptomatic atherosclerosis of the carotid artery;
- pericardial effusion greater than 10 mm;
- clinically significant bleeding within the 30 days prior to the scheduled procedure;
- stroke or other cardioembolic event within the 30 days prior to the scheduled procedure;
- acute coronary syndrome within the 90 days prior to the scheduled procedure,
- gravidity,
- significant valvular disease,
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cardiocenter, 3rd Medical School, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Prague, 10034, Czechia
Related Publications (23)
Miller PS, Andersson FL, Kalra L. Are cost benefits of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation underestimated? Stroke. 2005 Feb;36(2):360-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000153002.56324.8c. Epub 2005 Jan 6.
PMID: 15637326BACKGROUNDLin HJ, Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser AS, Kase CS, Benjamin EJ, D'Agostino RB. Stroke severity in atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Study. Stroke. 1996 Oct;27(10):1760-4. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.10.1760.
PMID: 8841325BACKGROUNDZoni-Berisso M, Filippi A, Landolina M, Brignoli O, D'Ambrosio G, Maglia G, Grimaldi M, Ermini G. Frequency, patient characteristics, treatment strategies, and resource usage of atrial fibrillation (from the Italian Survey of Atrial Fibrillation Management [ISAF] study). Am J Cardiol. 2013 Mar 1;111(5):705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.026. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
PMID: 23273528RESULTWolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB, Levy D, D'Agostino RB. Secular trends in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation: The Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1996 Apr;131(4):790-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90288-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 8721656RESULTKannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am J Cardiol. 1998 Oct 16;82(8A):2N-9N. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00583-9.
PMID: 9809895RESULTStoddard MF, Dawkins PR, Prince CR, Ammash NM. Left atrial appendage thrombus is not uncommon in patients with acute atrial fibrillation and a recent embolic event: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Feb;25(2):452-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00396-8.
PMID: 7829800RESULTACTIVE Writing Group of the ACTIVE Investigators; Connolly S, Pogue J, Hart R, Pfeffer M, Hohnloser S, Chrolavicius S, Pfeffer M, Hohnloser S, Yusuf S. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006 Jun 10;367(9526):1903-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68845-4.
PMID: 16765759RESULTGage BF, Boechler M, Doggette AL, Fortune G, Flaker GC, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Adverse outcomes and predictors of underuse of antithrombotic therapy in medicare beneficiaries with chronic atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2000 Apr;31(4):822-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.4.822.
PMID: 10753982RESULTDe Caterina R, Husted S, Wallentin L, Andreotti F, Arnesen H, Bachmann F, Baigent C, Huber K, Jespersen J, Kristensen SD, Lip GY, Morais J, Rasmussen LH, Siegbahn A, Verheugt FW, Weitz JI; Coordinating Committee. New oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndromes: ESC Working Group on Thrombosis-Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease position paper. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 17;59(16):1413-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.008.
PMID: 22497820RESULTConnolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, Pogue J, Reilly PA, Themeles E, Varrone J, Wang S, Alings M, Xavier D, Zhu J, Diaz R, Lewis BS, Darius H, Diener HC, Joyner CD, Wallentin L; RE-LY Steering Committee and Investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1139-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905561. Epub 2009 Aug 30.
PMID: 19717844RESULTPatel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, Breithardt G, Halperin JL, Hankey GJ, Piccini JP, Becker RC, Nessel CC, Paolini JF, Berkowitz SD, Fox KA, Califf RM; ROCKET AF Investigators. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):883-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009638. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
PMID: 21830957RESULTConnolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C, Diener HC, Hart R, Golitsyn S, Flaker G, Avezum A, Hohnloser SH, Diaz R, Talajic M, Zhu J, Pais P, Budaj A, Parkhomenko A, Jansky P, Commerford P, Tan RS, Sim KH, Lewis BS, Van Mieghem W, Lip GY, Kim JH, Lanas-Zanetti F, Gonzalez-Hermosillo A, Dans AL, Munawar M, O'Donnell M, Lawrence J, Lewis G, Afzal R, Yusuf S; AVERROES Steering Committee and Investigators. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):806-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007432. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
PMID: 21309657RESULTGranger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, Al-Khalidi HR, Ansell J, Atar D, Avezum A, Bahit MC, Diaz R, Easton JD, Ezekowitz JA, Flaker G, Garcia D, Geraldes M, Gersh BJ, Golitsyn S, Goto S, Hermosillo AG, Hohnloser SH, Horowitz J, Mohan P, Jansky P, Lewis BS, Lopez-Sendon JL, Pais P, Parkhomenko A, Verheugt FW, Zhu J, Wallentin L; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):981-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107039. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
PMID: 21870978RESULTHolmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Mullin CM, Sick P; PROTECT AF Investigators. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009 Aug 15;374(9689):534-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61343-X.
PMID: 19683639RESULTReddy VY, Mobius-Winkler S, Miller MA, Neuzil P, Schuler G, Wiebe J, Sick P, Sievert H. Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study With Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 25;61(25):2551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.035. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
PMID: 23583249RESULTChun KR, Bordignon S, Urban V, Perrotta L, Dugo D, Furnkranz A, Nowak B, Schmidt B. Left atrial appendage closure followed by 6 weeks of antithrombotic therapy: a prospective single-center experience. Heart Rhythm. 2013 Dec;10(12):1792-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.025. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
PMID: 23973952RESULTReddy VY, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, Halperin JL, Holmes D; PROTECT AF Investigators. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial. Circulation. 2013 Feb 12;127(6):720-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
PMID: 23325525RESULTSchulman S, Kearon C; Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Apr;3(4):692-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01204.x.
PMID: 15842354RESULTAlli O, Doshi S, Kar S, Reddy V, Sievert H, Mullin C, Swarup V, Whisenant B, Holmes D Jr. Quality of life assessment in the randomized PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial of patients at risk for stroke with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 30;61(17):1790-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.061. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
PMID: 23500276RESULTLloyd-Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP, Larson MG, Levy D, Vasan RS, D'Agostino RB, Massaro JM, Beiser A, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004 Aug 31;110(9):1042-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140263.20897.42. Epub 2004 Aug 16.
PMID: 15313941RESULTOsmancik P, Neuzil P, Karel T, Waldauf P, Hozmanova J, Hozman M, Kralovec S, Herman D, Petru J, Sediva L, Fischer J, Stepanek L, Mala I, Whang W, Reddy VY. Pulsed field ablation vs sham ablation to treat atrial fibrillation (the PFA-SHAM trial). Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Aug 7;6(11):1815-1824. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.07.103. eCollection 2025 Nov.
PMID: 41357284DERIVEDOsmancik P, Herman D, Neuzil P, Hala P, Taborsky M, Kala P, Poloczek M, Stasek J, Haman L, Branny M, Chovancik J, Cervinka P, Holy J, Kovarnik T, Zemanek D, Havranek S, Vancura V, Peichl P, Tousek P, Lekesova V, Jarkovsky J, Novackova M, Benesova K, Widimsky P, Reddy VY; PRAGUE-17 Trial Investigators. 4-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Nonwarfarin Oral Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 4;79(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.023. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
PMID: 34748929DERIVEDOsmancik P, Herman D, Neuzil P, Hala P, Taborsky M, Kala P, Poloczek M, Stasek J, Haman L, Branny M, Chovancik J, Cervinka P, Holy J, Kovarnik T, Zemanek D, Havranek S, Vancura V, Opatrny J, Peichl P, Tousek P, Lekesova V, Jarkovsky J, Novackova M, Benesova K, Widimsky P, Reddy VY; PRAGUE-17 Trial Investigators. Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 30;75(25):3122-3135. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.067.
PMID: 32586585DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- 3. Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2015
First Posted
April 27, 2015
Study Start
October 13, 2015
Primary Completion
July 20, 2019
Study Completion
July 20, 2019
Last Updated
June 11, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06