Study to Evaluate Activity of 2 Dose Levels of Imetelstat in Participants With Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF) Previously Treated With Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor
A Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicenter Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Activity of 2 Dose Levels of Imetelstat in Subjects With Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF) Relapsed/Refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor
3 other identifiers
interventional
107
11 countries
72
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of imetelstat in participants with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) whose disease is relapsed after or is refractory to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment. Key secondary endpoint includes overall survival.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Aug 2015
Typical duration for phase_2
72 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 28, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 26, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 7, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 14, 2021
CompletedSeptember 14, 2021
August 1, 2021
2.7 years
April 21, 2015
April 2, 2021
August 17, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response
Spleen response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at Week 24 from baseline performed by the IRC using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Symptom Response
Symptom response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 from baseline as measured by the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version 2.0 diary. The MFSAF assessed following symptoms due to Myelofibrosis (MF): night sweats, itchiness, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left side, feeling of fullness, bone or muscle pain and degree of inactivity. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and greater inactivity. The total score ranges from 0-70, where 0 indicates absent/as good as it can be and 70 indicates worst imaginable/as bad as it can be.
Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response as Per Modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Spleen Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Symptoms Response Per Modified 2013 IWG-MRT Criteria
Every 12 weeks up to Week 48 then every 24 weeks (approximately up to 2.3 years)
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALImetelstat 9.4 mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Participants received imetelstat 4.7 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Study drug was administered intravenously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end.
Participants received imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg of body weight as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (PMF) according to the revised WHO criteria; or post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis (PET-MF) or post-polycythemia vera-myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) according to the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria.
- Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-2 or highrisk MF.
- Measurable splenomegaly prior to study entry as demonstrated by palpable spleen measuring ≥ 5 cm below the left costal margin OR spleen volume of ≥ 450 cm\^3 measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Active symptoms of MF as demonstrated by a symptom score of at least 5 points (on a 0 to 10 scale) on at least one of the symptoms or a score of 3 or greater on at least 2 of the symptoms.
- Documented progressive disease during or after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2.
You may not qualify if:
- Peripheral blood blast count of ≥ 10% or bone marrow blast count of ≥ 10%.
- Prior treatment with imetelstat.
- Any chemotherapy or MF-directed therapy, investigational drug, hydroxyurea, immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy, corticosteroids or JAK inhibitor therapy ≤14 days prior to randomization.
- Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
- Active systemic hepatitis infection requiring treatment (carriers of hepatitis virus are permitted to enter the study), of any type or known acute or chronic liver disease including cirrhosis.
- Prior history of hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (72)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Duarte, California, United States
Unknown Facility
La Jolla, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Stanford, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Buffalo, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Lake Success, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
The Bronx, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Watertown, South Dakota, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Seattle, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Antwerp, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Bruges, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Brussels, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Leuven, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Unknown Facility
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Angers, France
Unknown Facility
Lille, France
Unknown Facility
Marseille, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, France
Unknown Facility
Pierre-Bénite, France
Unknown Facility
Toulouse, France
Unknown Facility
Aachen, Germany
Unknown Facility
Cologne, Germany
Unknown Facility
Dresden, Germany
Unknown Facility
Düsseldorf, Germany
Unknown Facility
Frankfurt, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Heidelberg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Leipzig, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mannheim, Germany
Unknown Facility
Rostock, Germany
Unknown Facility
Haifa, Israel
Unknown Facility
Jerusalem, Israel
Unknown Facility
Kfar Saba, Israel
Unknown Facility
Nahariya, Israel
Unknown Facility
Ramat Gan, Israel
Unknown Facility
Tel Aviv, Israel
Unknown Facility
Bergamo, Italy
Unknown Facility
Bologna, Italy
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Salamanca, Spain
Unknown Facility
Valencia, Spain
Unknown Facility
Chiayi City, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taipei, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Oxford, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Mascarenhas J, Komrokji RS, Palandri F, Martino B, Niederwieser D, Reiter A, Scott BL, Baer MR, Hoffman R, Odenike O, Vannucchi AM, Bussolari J, Zhu E, Rose E, Sherman L, Dougherty S, Sun L, Huang F, Wan Y, Feller FM, Rizo A, Kiladjian JJ. Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicenter Phase II Study of Two Doses of Imetelstat in Relapsed or Refractory Myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 10;39(26):2881-2892. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02864. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
PMID: 34138638DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Geron Corp.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Clinical Team
Geron Corporation
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Initially single-blind; treatments unmasked after 1st Interim Analysis and continued as open-label treatment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2015
First Posted
April 24, 2015
Study Start
August 28, 2015
Primary Completion
April 26, 2018
Study Completion
February 7, 2020
Last Updated
September 14, 2021
Results First Posted
September 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08