Intensive Versus Minimal Surveillance of Patients With Resected Dukes B2-C Colorectal Carcinoma
GILDA
A Randomized Trial Of Intensive Versus Minimal Surveillance Of Patients With Resected Dukes B2-C Colorectal Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
1,242
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Dukes B2-C colorectal cancer patients who had no evidence of disease at the end of their front line treatment (surgery and adjuvant radio-chemotherapy, if indicated) are eligible for the trial and randomized to two different surveillance programs. These programs differ greatly in the frequency of diagnostic imaging. They have similar schedules of physical examinations and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assessments. Patients will receive baseline and yearly health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) questionnaires. Primary outcomes are overall survival and QoL.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Apr 1998
Longer than P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 1998
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2015
CompletedApril 9, 2015
April 1, 2015
14.7 years
April 1, 2015
April 8, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause
5-year OS
Health Related Quality of Life
mean scores for Short Form Health Status Survey (SF)12 and Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) questionnaires
Yearly assessment over 5 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Disease free survival (DFS)
5-year DFS
Study Arms (2)
minimal surveillance
OTHERMinimal program for colon cancer: Office visit and CEA at 4,8,12,16,20,24,30,36,42,48, and 60 months. Colonoscopy at 12, and 48 months. Liver echography\* at 8, and 20 months.
intensive surveillance
OTHERIntensive program for colon cancer: Office visit, complet blood count (CBC), CEA+ Carbohydrate Antigen (CA) 19.9 at 4,8,12,16,20,24,30,36,42,48, and 60 months. Colonoscopy at 12, 24, 36, 48,and 60 months. Liver echography\* at 4,8,12,16,24,36,48, and 60 months. Chest X-ray at 12,24,36,48,and 60 months.
Interventions
These are two different surveillance programs for Dukes B2-C colorectal cancer patients who have no evidence of disease at the end of their front line treatment (surgery and adjuvant radio-chemotherapy, if indicated). These programs differ greatly in the frequency of diagnostic imaging. They had similar schedules of physical examinations and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assessments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum with Dukes Astler-Coller modification stage B2-C who had been treated with curative intent (radical excision ± adjuvant radio-chemotherapy) .
- Eligible patients had to be free of known cancer prior to study entry as attested by negative results of endoscopy, liver ultrasonography, chest roentgenography and serum CEA level performed \< 4 months before randomization
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to undergo testing (disability, allergy to contrast agents, etc.) and patients geographically not amenable to full follow-up.
- Patients enrolled onto any other research protocol that requires strict adherence to any specific follow-up practice.
- A history of any previous malignancy in the last 10 years (other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or non-melanoma skin cancer).
- No informed consent to participate in the trial according to local regulatory guidelines.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Rosati G, Ambrosini G, Barni S, Andreoni B, Corradini G, Luchena G, Daniele B, Gaion F, Oliverio G, Duro M, Martignoni G, Pinna N, Sozzi P, Pancera G, Solina G, Pavia G, Pignata S, Johnson F, Labianca R, Apolone G, Zaniboni A, Monteforte M, Negri E, Torri V, Mosconi P, Fossati R; GILDA working group. A randomized trial of intensive versus minimal surveillance of patients with resected Dukes B2-C colorectal carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2016 Feb;27(2):274-80. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv541. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
PMID: 26578734DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Bruno Andreoni, MD
European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2015
First Posted
April 6, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 1998
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 9, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04