Study Stopped
due to slow recruitment and budgetary restraints study was prematurely terminated
Comparative Trial of IV Lacosamide Versus Phenytoin for Seizure Management
Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Comparative Trial of IV Lacosamide Versus Phenytoin for Seizure Management
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Investigator plans to perform a prospective, randomized, single blinded, study that will compare patients treated with IV lacosamide to those treated with Phenytoin in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting. The investigator will also evaluate the rate of clinically evident and sub-clinical seizures, and to compare long-term outcomes between patients treated with lacosamide and those treated with Phenytoin.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Aug 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 7, 2016
January 1, 2016
1.3 years
April 1, 2015
January 5, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Clinical Adverse Events
Safety: the primary outcome measure will be the incidence of clinical adverse events. Patients will be evaluated daily during the hospital stay for seizures, fever, neurological changes, cardiovascular, hematologic and dermatologic abnormalities, liver failure, renal failure, and death. Each adverse event will be classified by the principal investigator as attributable or possibly attributable to the study drug versus other events. Serious adverse events for these to study will be defined as those that result in death, prolonged hospitalization, life threatening events, persistent or significant disability, or an important medical event that may not be immediately life threatening or result in death but based upon appropriate medical judgment may jeopardize the participant, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy
6 months
Study Arms (2)
lacosamide
EXPERIMENTALThe lacosamide group will receive a loading dose of 400 mg IV, and on maintenance dose of up to 400 mg every 12 hours.
phenytoin
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe phenytoin group will receive a loading dose of 20 mg/K IV, maximum of 2000 mg, given over 60 min. and will be started on a maintenance dose of 5 mg/K/day. Levels will be checked accordingly.
Interventions
Comparison of patients treated with IV lacosamide to those treated with phenytoin in the intensive care unit setting. The lacosamide group will receive a loading dose of 400 mg IV, and on maintenance dose of up to 400 mg every 12 hours.
the phenytoin group will receive a loading dose of 20 mg/K IV, maximum of 2000 mg, given over 60 min. and will be started on a maintenance dose of 5 mg/K/day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) or Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)
- Admitted to the hospital less than 48 hours prior to randomization
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 3-8 (inclusive), or GCS motor score of five or less and abnormal CT scan showing intracranial pathology
- Hemodynamically stable
- Older than 18 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- No IV access
- Spinal cord injury
- History of or CT confirmation of previous brain injury, including brain tumor, stroke, or a spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
- Hemodynamically unstable
- Suspected anoxia
- Liver failure
- Younger than 18 years of age
- Pregnant
- Allergy to phenytoin or lacosamide
- Inability to obtain consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jorge Burneo, MD
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2015
First Posted
April 6, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
November 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01