Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Compared to Olmesartan Medoxomil in Chinese Participants With Grade I or II Essential Hypertension
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Compared to Olmesartan Medoxomil in Chinese Participants With Grade I or II Essential Hypertension
1 other identifier
interventional
304
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To investigate the efficacy and safety of azilsartan compared to olmesartan medoxomil in patients with grade I or II essential hypertension
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedApril 2, 2015
January 1, 2015
9 months
March 30, 2015
March 30, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Trough sitting diastolic blood pressure (change from end of the run-in period to end of the treatment period)
16 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Trough sitting systolic blood pressure (change from end of the run-in period to end of the treatment period)
16 weeks
Trough sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure (change from end of the run-in period to Week 8 of the treatment period)
8 weeks
Trough sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressures at each evaluation
2 weeks
responder rate; rate of patients with normalized blood pressure
8 weeks and 16 weeks
evaluation by ABPM (1: 24-hour mean change in diastolic and systolic blood pressures, 2: Trough/Peak ratio of diastolic and systolic blood pressures)(change from end of the run-in period to Week 14 of the treatment period)
14 weeks
Study Arms (2)
azilsartan group
EXPERIMENTALOnce-daily oral administration of 20 or 40 mg tablet before or after breakfast
olmesartan medoxomil group
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnce-daily oral administration of 20 or 40 mg tablet before or after breakfast
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both sexes. eighteen years or older and no more than 70 years at the time of informed consent
- Grade I or II essential hypertension
- Both sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures at Week 0 during the run-in period meet the following criteria:
- Sitting systolic blood pressure: greater than or equal to 150 mmHg and less than 180 mmHg
- Sitting diastolic blood pressure: greater than or equal to 95 mmHg and less than 110 mmHg
- Able to understand the content of the study and comply with the study and to give informed consent in writing before participating in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Secondary hypertension, grade III hypertension (sitting systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 180 mmHg or sitting diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 110 mmHg), or malignant hypertension,hypertensive emergencies,hypertensive urgencies
- The following circulatory-related diseases or symptoms:
- (1) Cardiac disease: angina pectoris; valvular stenosis; atrial fibrillation; the following diseases requiring medication: congestive heart failure or arrhythmia; (2) Cerebrovascular disorder: cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage (onset within 24 weeks before start of the screening period), transient ischemic attack (onset of an attack within 24 weeks before start of the screening period); (3) Vascular disease: arteriosclerosis obliterans with symptoms of intermittent claudication; (4) Progressive hypertensive retinopathy: hemorrhage, exudation, or papilledema (observed within 24 weeks after start of the screening period)
- \. Decrease in sitting diastolic blood pressure by 8 mmHg or more at the end of the run-in period (Week 0) compared to the start of the screening period
- \. Day/night reversal, e.g., nightshift worker
- \. Unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis
- \. Clinically apparent hepatic and renal impairment (e.g., with AST and ALT values of 2.5 x upper limit of normal or higher, with serum creatinine value of 1.5 x upper limit of normal or higher during the screening period)
- \. Hyperkalemia (with a laboratory value of 5.5 mEq/L or higher during the run-in period)
- \. Malignant tumor
- \. Compliance with the study drug of less than 80% during the run-in period
- \. Poorly-controlled diabetes mellitus (fasting plasma glucose greater than 11mmol/L),and/or complications (kidney disease, peripheral neuropathy) at Screening.
- \. History of hypersensitivity or allergy to olmesartan medoxomil tablets and related drugs (ARB, ACE inhibitors, and renin inhibitors)
- \. History of drug abuse (defined as illegal drug use) or alcohol dependency within 2 years before start of the screening period
- \. Requirement of the excluded treatment
- \. Pregnant or lactating women
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beijing ANZHEN Hospital
Beijing, 100029, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2015
First Posted
April 2, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 2, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-01