A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of a Fixed Dose Combination of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone in Patients With High Blood Pressure Who do Not Achieve Target Blood Pressure Following Treatment With Azilsartan Medoxomil Alone
A Phase-3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Efficacy and Safety Study Evaluating the Fixed Dose Combinations of TAK-491 Plus Chlorthalidone (40/12.5 mg and 40/25 mg) in Subjects With Grades 2 or 3 Essential Hypertension, Who Do Not Achieve Target Blood Pressure Following Treatment With TAK-491 40 mg Monotherapy
5 other identifiers
interventional
507
12 countries
99
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the fixed dose combinations of azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone (40/12.5 and 40/25 mg), once daily, in participants with grades 2 or 3 essential hypertension who do not reach target blood pressure following treatment with 40 mg azilsartan medoxomil monotherapy after 4 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Oct 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
99 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 23, 2014
CompletedApril 23, 2014
March 1, 2014
1.2 years
October 18, 2011
December 26, 2013
March 21, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure
The change between trough systolic blood pressure measured at final visit or Week 8 relative to baseline. Systolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the 3 trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements.
Baseline (of the double-blind treatment period) and Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure
Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough Systolic Blood Pressure as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Baseline and Week 8, 22-24 hours after dosing
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough Diastolic Blood Pressure as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Baseline and Week 8, 22-24 hours after dosing
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Baseline and Week 8
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORAzilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and placebo to chlorthalidone combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
Azilsartan medoxomil + chlorthalidone 40/12.5 mg
EXPERIMENTALAzilsartan 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
Azilsartan medoxomil + chlorthalidone 40/25 mg
EXPERIMENTALAzilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
Interventions
Azilsartan medoxomil and placebo to chlorthalidone combination tablets
Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone fixed dose combination tablets
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At Screening
- The participant has grade 2-3 essential hypertension which is not adequately controlled, as defined by mean, trough, sitting, clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP):
- ≥160 to ≤180 mm Hg in participants who have not received any antihypertensive medication in the 14 days prior to Visit 1.
- ≥150 to ≤170 mm Hg in participants taking 1 antihypertensive medication at Visit 1.
- ≥140 to ≤160 mm Hg in participants taking 2 antihypertensive medications at Visit 1.
- The participant has clinical laboratory test results (clinical chemistry, hematology, and complete urinalysis) within the reference range for the testing laboratory or the investigator does not consider the results to be clinically relevant for precluding entry in to the study in this hypertensive population.
- The participant is willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications.
- In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
- The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
- Male or female adult, at least 18 years of age.
- A female of childbearing potential who is sexually active with a nonsterilized male partner agrees to routinely use adequate contraception from signing of the informed consent through 30 days after the last study drug dose. NOTE: Women NOT of childbearing potential are defined as those who have been surgically sterilized (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, tubal ligation \[performed more than one 1 year prior to Screening\]) or who are postmenopausal (defined as at least 1 year since last regular menses).
- Post-placebo run-in:
- The participant must have a post-placebo run-in, 24-hour mean SBP by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) of 140-175 mm Hg inclusive, and a clinic SBP measurement of 160 to 190 mm Hg inclusive (determined by the mean of 3 sitting, trough, measurements on Day -29) to qualify for entry in to the 4 week single-blind TAK-491 40 mg monotherapy treatment period.
- Post-4 week, single-blind TAK-491 40 mg monotherapy treatment:
- The participant does not achieve target blood pressure (defined as clinic SBP ≥140 mm Hg as determined by the mean of 3 sitting, trough, measurements) following 4 weeks single-blind treatment with TAK-491 40 mg monotherapy at Day -1, prior to randomization to double-blind treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- At Screening
- The participant has clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>110 mm Hg.
- The participant's 3 SBP measurements differ by more than 15 mm Hg (confirmed by a second set of three measurements).
- The participant has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening or is currently participating in another investigational study. NOTE: Participants participating in observational studies (per local definition) may enter Screening provided that the last intervention or invasive procedure was \>30 days prior to Visit 1.
- The participant has been randomized/enrolled in a previous TAK-491 or TAK-491CLD study. NOTE: This criterion does not apply to participants who entered screening or placebo run-in in another TAK-491 or TAK-491CLD study but were not randomized/enrolled.
- The participant is a study site employee or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (e.g., spouse, parent, child, sibling) or may consent under duress.
- The participant is currently treated with more than 2 antihypertensive medications.
- The participant works a night (third) shift (defined as 11 PM \[2300\] to 7 AM \[0700\]).
- The participant has an upper arm circumference \<24 cm or \>42 cm.
- The participant has secondary hypertension of any etiology (e.g., renovascular disease, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome).
- The participant has any history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation or transient ischemic attack.
- The participant has clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (e.g., third-degree atrioventricular block, sick sinus syndrome).
- The participant has hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
- The participant has severe renal dysfunction or disease \[based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 mL/min/1.73m\^2 at screening\], prior renal transplantation or nephrotic syndrome (defined as a urinary albumin/creatinine ratio \>2000 mg/g at Screening).
- Participant has known hemodynamically significant bilateral renal artery stenosis or unilateral disease in a single kidney.
- +16 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (108)
Unknown Facility
Haskovo, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Pazardzhik, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Pleven, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Varna, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Paide, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Saku, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Tallinn, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Tartu, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Võru, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Labarthe-sur-Lèze, Haute Garonne, France
Unknown Facility
Bourg-des-Comptes, Ille et Vilaine, France
Unknown Facility
Tours, Indre et Loire, France
Unknown Facility
Vourey, Isere, France
Unknown Facility
Saint-Étienne-de-Montluc, Pays de la Loire Region, France
Unknown Facility
Orthez, Pyrenees Atlantiques, France
Unknown Facility
Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bad Wörishofen, Bavaria, Germany
Unknown Facility
Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany
Unknown Facility
Stuhr, Lower Saxony, Germany
Unknown Facility
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Unknown Facility
Kamp-Lintfort, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Unknown Facility
Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Debrecen, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Gyöngyös, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Gyula, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Nyíregyháza, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Pécs, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Szikszó, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Torrette Di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
Unknown Facility
Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
Unknown Facility
Brescia, Brescia, Italy
Unknown Facility
Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
Unknown Facility
L’Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
Unknown Facility
Milan, Milano, Italy
Unknown Facility
Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Unknown Facility
Pavia, Pavia, Italy
Unknown Facility
Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Unknown Facility
Roma, Roma, Italy
Unknown Facility
Sassari, Sassari, Italy
Unknown Facility
Legnago, Verona, Italy
Unknown Facility
Bologna, Italy
Unknown Facility
Alytus, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Kaunas, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Beek, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Breda, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Groningen, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Leiderdorp, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Maastricht, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Velp, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Zoetermeer, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Zwijndrecht, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gdansk, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gdynia, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lodz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Oświęcim, Poland
Unknown Facility
Parczew, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, Poland
Unknown Facility
Pulway, Poland
Unknown Facility
Rzeszów, Poland
Unknown Facility
Sopot, Poland
Unknown Facility
Torun, Poland
Unknown Facility
Zgierz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Belgrade, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Kamenitz, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Kragujevac, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Kruševac, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Niš, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Zemun, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Bardejov, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Bratislava, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Galanta, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Komárno, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Košice, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Lučenec, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Martin, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Nitra, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Nové Zámky, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Prešov, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Svidník, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Žilina, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Centelles, Barcelona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Málaga, Malaga, Spain
Unknown Facility
Gothenburg, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Lund, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Malmo, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Vällingby, Sweden
Unknown Facility
London, Greater London, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Glasgow, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Blackpool, Lancashire, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Royal Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Westbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr. VP, Clinical Science
- Organization
- Takeda GlobalResearch and Development Center, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director, Clinical Science
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2011
First Posted
October 20, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 23, 2014
Results First Posted
April 23, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03