NCT01456169

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the fixed dose combinations of azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone (40/12.5 and 40/25 mg), once daily, in participants with grades 2 or 3 essential hypertension who do not reach target blood pressure following treatment with 40 mg azilsartan medoxomil monotherapy after 4 weeks.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
507

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
12 countries

99 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2011

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 18, 2011

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 20, 2011

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2013

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 23, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 23, 2014

Status Verified

March 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

October 18, 2011

Results QC Date

December 26, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 21, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

High Blood PressureDrug Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure

    The change between trough systolic blood pressure measured at final visit or Week 8 relative to baseline. Systolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the 3 trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements.

    Baseline (of the double-blind treatment period) and Week 8

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Baseline and Week 8

  • Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough Systolic Blood Pressure as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

    Baseline and Week 8, 22-24 hours after dosing

  • Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough Diastolic Blood Pressure as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

    Baseline and Week 8, 22-24 hours after dosing

  • Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

    Baseline and Week 8

  • Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

    Baseline and Week 8

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and placebo to chlorthalidone combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Drug: Azilsartan medoxomil/placebo

Azilsartan medoxomil + chlorthalidone 40/12.5 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Drug: Azilsartan medoxomil - chlorthalidone

Azilsartan medoxomil + chlorthalidone 40/25 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Drug: Azilsartan medoxomil - chlorthalidone

Interventions

Azilsartan medoxomil and placebo to chlorthalidone combination tablets

Also known as: TAK-491, EDARBI
Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone fixed dose combination tablets

Also known as: TAK-491CLD, Edarbyclor
Azilsartan medoxomil + chlorthalidone 40/12.5 mgAzilsartan medoxomil + chlorthalidone 40/25 mg

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • At Screening
  • The participant has grade 2-3 essential hypertension which is not adequately controlled, as defined by mean, trough, sitting, clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP):
  • ≥160 to ≤180 mm Hg in participants who have not received any antihypertensive medication in the 14 days prior to Visit 1.
  • ≥150 to ≤170 mm Hg in participants taking 1 antihypertensive medication at Visit 1.
  • ≥140 to ≤160 mm Hg in participants taking 2 antihypertensive medications at Visit 1.
  • The participant has clinical laboratory test results (clinical chemistry, hematology, and complete urinalysis) within the reference range for the testing laboratory or the investigator does not consider the results to be clinically relevant for precluding entry in to the study in this hypertensive population.
  • The participant is willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications.
  • In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
  • The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
  • Male or female adult, at least 18 years of age.
  • A female of childbearing potential who is sexually active with a nonsterilized male partner agrees to routinely use adequate contraception from signing of the informed consent through 30 days after the last study drug dose. NOTE: Women NOT of childbearing potential are defined as those who have been surgically sterilized (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, tubal ligation \[performed more than one 1 year prior to Screening\]) or who are postmenopausal (defined as at least 1 year since last regular menses).
  • Post-placebo run-in:
  • The participant must have a post-placebo run-in, 24-hour mean SBP by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) of 140-175 mm Hg inclusive, and a clinic SBP measurement of 160 to 190 mm Hg inclusive (determined by the mean of 3 sitting, trough, measurements on Day -29) to qualify for entry in to the 4 week single-blind TAK-491 40 mg monotherapy treatment period.
  • Post-4 week, single-blind TAK-491 40 mg monotherapy treatment:
  • The participant does not achieve target blood pressure (defined as clinic SBP ≥140 mm Hg as determined by the mean of 3 sitting, trough, measurements) following 4 weeks single-blind treatment with TAK-491 40 mg monotherapy at Day -1, prior to randomization to double-blind treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • At Screening
  • The participant has clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>110 mm Hg.
  • The participant's 3 SBP measurements differ by more than 15 mm Hg (confirmed by a second set of three measurements).
  • The participant has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening or is currently participating in another investigational study. NOTE: Participants participating in observational studies (per local definition) may enter Screening provided that the last intervention or invasive procedure was \>30 days prior to Visit 1.
  • The participant has been randomized/enrolled in a previous TAK-491 or TAK-491CLD study. NOTE: This criterion does not apply to participants who entered screening or placebo run-in in another TAK-491 or TAK-491CLD study but were not randomized/enrolled.
  • The participant is a study site employee or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (e.g., spouse, parent, child, sibling) or may consent under duress.
  • The participant is currently treated with more than 2 antihypertensive medications.
  • The participant works a night (third) shift (defined as 11 PM \[2300\] to 7 AM \[0700\]).
  • The participant has an upper arm circumference \<24 cm or \>42 cm.
  • The participant has secondary hypertension of any etiology (e.g., renovascular disease, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome).
  • The participant has any history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation or transient ischemic attack.
  • The participant has clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (e.g., third-degree atrioventricular block, sick sinus syndrome).
  • The participant has hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
  • The participant has severe renal dysfunction or disease \[based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 mL/min/1.73m\^2 at screening\], prior renal transplantation or nephrotic syndrome (defined as a urinary albumin/creatinine ratio \>2000 mg/g at Screening).
  • Participant has known hemodynamically significant bilateral renal artery stenosis or unilateral disease in a single kidney.
  • +16 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (108)

Unknown Facility

Haskovo, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Pazardzhik, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Pleven, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Sofia, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Varna, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Paide, Estonia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saku, Estonia

Location

Unknown Facility

Tallinn, Estonia

Location

Unknown Facility

Tartu, Estonia

Location

Unknown Facility

Võru, Estonia

Location

Unknown Facility

Labarthe-sur-Lèze, Haute Garonne, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Bourg-des-Comptes, Ille et Vilaine, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Tours, Indre et Loire, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Vourey, Isere, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint-Étienne-de-Montluc, Pays de la Loire Region, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Orthez, Pyrenees Atlantiques, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Bad Wörishofen, Bavaria, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Stuhr, Lower Saxony, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Kamp-Lintfort, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Budapest, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Debrecen, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Gyöngyös, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Gyula, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Nyíregyháza, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Pécs, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Szikszó, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Torrette Di Ancona, Ancona, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Brescia, Brescia, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

L’Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Milan, Milano, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Roma, Roma, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Legnago, Verona, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Bologna, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Alytus, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Kaunas, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Beek, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Breda, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Eindhoven, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Groningen, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Leiderdorp, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Maastricht, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Rotterdam, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Velp, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Zoetermeer, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Zwijndrecht, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Bydgoszcz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Gdansk, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Gdynia, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Krakow, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lodz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lublin, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Oświęcim, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Parczew, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Poznan, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Pulway, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Rzeszów, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Sopot, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Torun, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Zgierz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Belgrade, Serbia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kamenitz, Serbia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kragujevac, Serbia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kruševac, Serbia

Location

Unknown Facility

Niš, Serbia

Location

Unknown Facility

Zemun, Serbia

Location

Unknown Facility

Bardejov, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Bratislava, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Galanta, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Komárno, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Košice, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Lučenec, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Martin, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Nitra, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Nové Zámky, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Prešov, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Svidník, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Žilina, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Centelles, Barcelona, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Málaga, Malaga, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Gothenburg, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

Lund, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

Malmo, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

Vällingby, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Glasgow, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Blackpool, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Royal Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Westbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Essential HypertensionHypertension

Interventions

azilsartan medoxomilazilsartan

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sr. VP, Clinical Science
Organization
Takeda GlobalResearch and Development Center, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Medical Director, Clinical Science

    Takeda

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2011

First Posted

October 20, 2011

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Study Completion

January 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 23, 2014

Results First Posted

April 23, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-03

Locations