Comparison of Peripheral and Cerebral Arterial Flow in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Fimasartan vs. Valsartan vs. Atenolol
FAVOR
1 other identifier
interventional
105
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Confirm central blood pressure reduction effect of Fimasartan, Valsartan and Atenolol and compare correlation with the measured peripheral (central blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, and flow-mediated dilation) and cerebral blood flow factors (transcranial doppler findings, cerebral blood flow volume) in acute ischemic stroke patients with hypertension.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2012
Typical duration for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedMarch 31, 2015
March 1, 2015
3 years
March 12, 2015
March 26, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Central Blood pressure control
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Blood pressure at the brachial artery
12 weeks
Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (ba-PWV)
12 weeks
Flow-mediated dilation (FMD)
12 weeks
Pulsatile index (PI)
12 weeks
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) volume
12 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Fimasartan
EXPERIMENTALfimasartan potassium 60mg, 1 tablet by mouth, every day Angiotensin ll receptor blocker
Valsartan
ACTIVE COMPARATORvalsartan 80mg, 1 tablet by mouth, every day angiotensin II receptor antagonists
Atenolol
ACTIVE COMPARATORatenolol 50mg, 1 tablet by mouth, every day beta-blocker
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 30 years old
- Acute ischemic stroke patient who has corresponding DWI(diffusion- weighted imaging) lesion correlated with symptom
- after 7days, but within 28days from stroke onset
- Diagnosed with Hypertension
- hypertensive patients who taking anti-hypertensive drugs or SBP≥140mmHg
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with hemorrhagic Stroke
- Patients with severe Stroke - over NIHss(National Institutes of Health stroke scale) 16
- Uncontrolled hypertension (SBP ≥200mmHg)
- Patients with history of allergic reaction to any angiotensin II antagonist
- Liver disease(more than double to normal level, SGOT(serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase ), SGPT(serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase ), total bilirubin)
- Renal disease(serum creatinine ≥2.0mg/dl)
- Anemia(Hb \< 8mg/dl)
- Thrombocytopenia( \< 10\^3/ml)
- Patients with secondary hypertension
- Childbearing and breast-feeding women
- Otherwise inappropriate patients depending on the investigator's decision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (25)
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ; Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003 Dec;42(6):1206-52. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2. Epub 2003 Dec 1.
PMID: 14656957RESULTLewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R; Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1903-13. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11911-8.
PMID: 12493255RESULTWiysonge CS, Bradley H, Mayosi BM, Maroney R, Mbewu A, Opie LH, Volmink J. Beta-blockers for hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub2.
PMID: 17253471RESULTHeart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators; Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001203420301.
PMID: 10639539RESULTLindholm LH, Ibsen H, Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Beevers G, de Faire U, Fyhrquist F, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Kristiansson K, Lederballe-Pedersen O, Nieminen MS, Omvik P, Oparil S, Wedel H, Aurup P, Edelman J, Snapinn S; LIFE Study Group. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002 Mar 23;359(9311):1004-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08090-X.
PMID: 11937179RESULTDiener HC, Sacco R, Yusuf S; Steering Committee; PRoFESS Study Group. Rationale, design and baseline data of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two antithrombotic regimens (a fixed-dose combination of extended-release dipyridamole plus ASA with clopidogrel) and telmisartan versus placebo in patients with strokes: the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes Trial (PRoFESS). Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(5-6):368-80. doi: 10.1159/000100105. Epub 2007 Feb 26.
PMID: 17337887RESULTSchrader J, Luders S, Kulschewski A, Hammersen F, Plate K, Berger J, Zidek W, Dominiak P, Diener HC; MOSES Study Group. Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke, Eprosartan Compared with Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES). Stroke. 2005 Jun;36(6):1218-26. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000166048.35740.a9. Epub 2005 May 5.
PMID: 15879332RESULTGeeganage C, Tracy M, England T, Sare G, Moulin T, Woimant F, Christensen H, De Deyn PP, Leys D, O'Neill D, Ringelstein EB, Bath PM; for TAIST Investigators. Relationship between baseline blood pressure parameters (including mean pressure, pulse pressure, and variability) and early outcome after stroke: data from the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Trial (TAIST). Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):491-3. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.596163. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
PMID: 21183747RESULTOliveira-Filho J, Silva SC, Trabuco CC, Pedreira BB, Sousa EU, Bacellar A. Detrimental effect of blood pressure reduction in the first 24 hours of acute stroke onset. Neurology. 2003 Oct 28;61(8):1047-51. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000092498.75010.57.
PMID: 14581662RESULTSandset EC, Bath PM, Boysen G, Jatuzis D, Korv J, Luders S, Murray GD, Richter PS, Roine RO, Terent A, Thijs V, Berge E; SCAST Study Group. The angiotensin-receptor blocker candesartan for treatment of acute stroke (SCAST): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2011 Feb 26;377(9767):741-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60104-9.
PMID: 21316752RESULTSteckelings UM, Rompe F, Kaschina E, Unger T. The evolving story of the RAAS in hypertension, diabetes and CV disease: moving from macrovascular to microvascular targets. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Dec;23(6):693-703. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2009.00780.x. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
PMID: 19817870RESULTDzau VJ, Antman EM, Black HR, Hayes DL, Manson JE, Plutzky J, Popma JJ, Stevenson W. The cardiovascular disease continuum validated: clinical evidence of improved patient outcomes: part I: Pathophysiology and clinical trial evidence (risk factors through stable coronary artery disease). Circulation. 2006 Dec 19;114(25):2850-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.655688. No abstract available.
PMID: 17179034RESULTNAVIGATOR Study Group; McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Haffner SM, Bethel MA, Holzhauer B, Hua TA, Belenkov Y, Boolell M, Buse JB, Buckley BM, Chacra AR, Chiang FT, Charbonnel B, Chow CC, Davies MJ, Deedwania P, Diem P, Einhorn D, Fonseca V, Fulcher GR, Gaciong Z, Gaztambide S, Giles T, Horton E, Ilkova H, Jenssen T, Kahn SE, Krum H, Laakso M, Leiter LA, Levitt NS, Mareev V, Martinez F, Masson C, Mazzone T, Meaney E, Nesto R, Pan C, Prager R, Raptis SA, Rutten GE, Sandstroem H, Schaper F, Scheen A, Schmitz O, Sinay I, Soska V, Stender S, Tamas G, Tognoni G, Tuomilehto J, Villamil AS, Vozar J, Califf RM. Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1477-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001121. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
PMID: 20228403RESULTJankowski P, Kawecka-Jaszcz K, Czarnecka D, Brzozowska-Kiszka M, Styczkiewicz K, Loster M, Kloch-Badelek M, Wilinski J, Curylo AM, Dudek D; Aortic Blood Pressure and Survival Study Group. Pulsatile but not steady component of blood pressure predicts cardiovascular events in coronary patients. Hypertension. 2008 Apr;51(4):848-55. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.101725. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
PMID: 18268136RESULTRoman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Galloway JM, Ali T, Umans JG, Howard BV. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension. 2007 Jul;50(1):197-203. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089078. Epub 2007 May 7.
PMID: 17485598RESULTSafar ME, Blacher J, Pannier B, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Guyonvarc'h PM, London GM. Central pulse pressure and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2002 Mar 1;39(3):735-8. doi: 10.1161/hy0202.098325.
PMID: 11897754RESULTRoman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Okin PM, Lee ET, Wang W, Umans JG, Calhoun D, Howard BV. High central pulse pressure is independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome the strong heart study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Oct 27;54(18):1730-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.070.
PMID: 19850215RESULTWilliams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, Cruickshank K, Stanton A, Collier D, Hughes AD, Thurston H, O'Rourke M; CAFE Investigators; Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Investigators; CAFE Steering Committee and Writing Committee. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation. 2006 Mar 7;113(9):1213-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595496. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
PMID: 16476843RESULTDhakam Z, McEniery CM, Yasmin, Cockcroft JR, Brown MJ, Wilkinson IB. Atenolol and eprosartan: differential effects on central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. Am J Hypertens. 2006 Feb;19(2):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.08.007.
PMID: 16448896RESULTNeutel J, Weber M, Pool J, Smith D, Fitzsimmons S, Chiang YT, Gatlin M. Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist: antihypertensive effects over 24 hours. Clin Ther. 1997 May-Jun;19(3):447-58; discussion 367-8. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80129-4.
PMID: 9220209RESULTTakazawa K, Kobayashi H, Shindo N, Tanaka N, Yamashina A. Relationship between radial and central arterial pulse wave and evaluation of central aortic pressure using the radial arterial pulse wave. Hypertens Res. 2007 Mar;30(3):219-28. doi: 10.1291/hypres.30.219.
PMID: 17510503RESULTYamashina A, Tomiyama H, Takeda K, Tsuda H, Arai T, Hirose K, Koji Y, Hori S, Yamamoto Y. Validity, reproducibility, and clinical significance of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement. Hypertens Res. 2002 May;25(3):359-64. doi: 10.1291/hypres.25.359.
PMID: 12135313RESULTLim MH, Cho YI, Jeong SK. Homocysteine and pulsatility index of cerebral arteries. Stroke. 2009 Oct;40(10):3216-20. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558403. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
PMID: 19628800RESULTKim DH, Choi JH, Moon JS, Kim HJ, Cha JK. Association between the severity of cerebral small vessel disease, pulsatility of cerebral arteries, and brachial ankle pulse wave velocity in patients with lacunar infarction. Eur Neurol. 2010;64(4):247-52. doi: 10.1159/000319923. Epub 2010 Sep 11.
PMID: 20838053RESULTHong JM, Lee JS, Shin DH, Yong SW. Hemodynamic impact of fetal-variant Willisian circle on cerebral circulation: a duplex ultrasonography study. Eur Neurol. 2011;65(6):340-5. doi: 10.1159/000327213. Epub 2011 May 19.
PMID: 21597296RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2015
First Posted
March 31, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 31, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03