Assess the Penumbra System in the Treatment of Acute Stroke
THERAPY
The THERAPY Trial: The Randomized, Concurrent Controlled Trial to Assess the Penumbra System's Safety and Effectiveness in the Treatment of Acute Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Penumbra System as an adjunctive treatment to intravenous (IV) recombinant human tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA)in patients with acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion in the brain. IV rtPA is the only drug approved for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke but it does not work very well in cases where the stroke is caused by a large vessel occlusion. The hypothesis being tested is to determine if the addition of a treatment by a mechanical thrombectomy device like the Penumbra System can improve the clinical outcome of the patient over just using IV rtPA alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 22, 2020
CompletedSeptember 22, 2020
September 1, 2020
4.4 years
September 2, 2011
March 4, 2019
September 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Good Functional Outcome as Defined by a Modified Rankin Score of 0-2
The assessor is blinded to patient treatment assignment.
90 days
Incidence of All Serious Adverse Events
A Serious Adverse Event is defined as an event that: 1. Led to death 2. Led to a serious deterioration in the health of the patient that: * Resulted in life-threatening illness or injury * Resulted in permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function * Required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Resulted in medical or surgical intervention to arrest permanent impairment to body structure or a body function * Led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Good Clinical Outcome
30 days
Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage
90 days
Study Arms (2)
IV rtPA
ACTIVE COMPARATORIV infusion of rtPA at 0.9mg/kg to a maximum of 90mg
IV rtPA and IA Penumbra System
EXPERIMENTALDual IV rtPA therapy (0.9mg/kg to a maximum of 90mg) and IA adjunctive treatment with the Penumbra System
Interventions
0.9mg/kg to a maximum of 90mg
The Penumbra System is an aspiration based mechanical thrombectomy device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- From 18 to 85 years of age
- Present with symptoms consistent with an acute ischemic stroke and eligible for IV rtPA therapy (patients presenting 3-4.5 hrs from symptom onset are not eligible if they are \>80 yrs of age, have a history of stroke and diabetes, anticoagulant use (even if INR is \<1.7) and have a NIHSS score \>25
- Evidence of a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation with a clot length of 8mm or longer
- NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 8 or greater or aphasic at presentation
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- History of stroke in the past 3 months.
- Females who are pregnant
- Pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that could confound the study results such as a pre-stroke mRS score 1 or greater
- Known severe allergy to contrast media
- Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure \>185 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \>110 mmHg)
- CT evidence of the following conditions at randomization:
- Significant mass effect with midline shift
- Any acute ischemic changes in \>1/3 of the affected middle cerebral artery territory
- Evidence of intracranial hemorrhage
- Angiographic evidence of preexisting arterial injury
- Rapidly improving neurological status prior to randomization
- Bilateral stroke
- Intracranial tumors
- Known history of cerebral aneurysm or arteriovenous malfunction
- Known hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation deficiency, or on anticoagulant therapy with an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of \>1.7
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Penumbra Inc.lead
Study Sites (4)
Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology, Swedish Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, 80112, United States
Department of Neurological Surgery
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Related Publications (1)
Yoo AJ, Khatri P, Mocco J, Zaidat OO, Gupta R, Frei D, Lopes D, Shownkeen H, Berkhemer OA, Meyer D, Hak SS, Kuo SS, Buell H, Bose A, Sit SP, von Kummer R; THERAPY Trial Investigators. Impact of Thrombus Length on Outcomes After Intra-Arterial Aspiration Thrombectomy in the THERAPY Trial. Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):1895-1900. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016253. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
PMID: 28596447DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michaella Corso
- Organization
- Penumbra, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
J Mocco, MD, MS
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pooja Khatri, MD
Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Osama Zaidat, MD, MSc
Neurointerventional Program, Medical College of Wisconsin
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2011
First Posted
September 7, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 22, 2020
Results First Posted
September 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09