Study Stopped
Low enrollment
Celiac Plexus Block for Chronic Pancreatitis RCT
Prospective Randomized Trial of EUS Guided Celiac Plexus Block for Chronic Pancreatitis
1 other identifier
interventional
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: Chronic pancreatitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pancreas which results in debilitating abdominal pain, decreased productivity and increased health care costs. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided celiac plexus block (CPB) is routinely used to treat pain related to chronic pancreatitis. While EUS guided neurolysis for pancreatic cancer has significant efficacy, the benefit of CPB for chronic pancreatitis pain is controversial and has not been studied in a rigorous manner. Objective: To assess whether EUS guided celiac plexus block decreases suffering, hospitalization, and opiate requirements related to chronic pancreatitis pain. Population: Patients undergoing EUS at Los Angeles County Hospital for painful chronic pancreatitis. Methods: Patients undergoing EUS to evaluate chronic pancreatitis with a typical visual analogue pain score \>3, regular opiate use, and M ANNHEIM chronic pancreatitis score \>6 will be eligible. Study Arms: Patients will be randomized to 1) diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound 2) endoscopic ultrasound with celiac plexus block Study Outcomes: The primary outcome will be a decrease in chronic pancreatitis pain assessed by the visual analogue scale and M ANNHEIM system at 24 weeks compared to immediately prior to the block. The ability to work and conduct normal activities, opiate medication requirements, and a Careprep symptom assessment at 24 weeks will also be compared prior to the block. Analytic Plan: The projected response rate to EUS guided CPB is 52%. Given known 30% placebo response in patients with pain related to chronic pancreatitis we anticipate that 83 patients will need to participate to demonstrate a difference. We aim to enroll 90 patients in this study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 12, 2018
CompletedFebruary 14, 2018
February 1, 2018
3.2 years
January 11, 2015
February 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Long Term CHANGE in Pain Scores
Primary outcomes will be the CHANGE pain score (as assessed by the visual-analogue-scale and M-ANNHEIM score assessed between time 0 and 24 weeks post procedure in those who undergo EUS without block (control) compared to those who undergo EUS with block
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Hospital re-admission
24 weeks
CHANGE Pain medication requirements
24 weeks
Procedure Complications
2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
EUS with Celiac Block
EXPERIMENTALCeliac Block with triamcinolone and bupivicaine Intra Plexus Triamcinolone and Bupivicaine Injection
EUS without Celiac Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will undergo EUS but no celiac block will be performed
Interventions
Endosonography of the pancreas performed following by analgesic injection
Injection of Triamcinolone and Bupivicaine into celiac plexus for pain relief
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presentation with upper abdominal pain suggestive of pancreatitis who are undergoing EUS for evaluation
- M ANNHEIM severity index of 6 or greater to be included
- Intermittent episodes of pain\>3 requiring opiate medication
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have allergic reactions to steroids or bupivacaine
- INR \>1.6
- platelets \<75
- decompensated cirrhosis
- incarcerated
- \<18 years old
- unable to give informed consent
- peptic ulcer disease
- ongoing substance or alcohol use
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Los Angeles County Hospital
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Related Publications (13)
Sarles H. Etiopathogenesis and definition of chronic pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1986 Sep;31(9 Suppl):91S-107S. doi: 10.1007/BF01295992.
PMID: 3525051BACKGROUNDWilcox CM. Tinkering with a tarnished technique: isn't it time to abandon celiac plexus blockade for the treatment of abdominal pain in chronic pancreatitis? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;10(2):106-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.10.039. Epub 2011 Nov 9. No abstract available.
PMID: 22079511BACKGROUNDKozak LJ, Owings MF, Hall MJ. National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2002 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. Vital Health Stat 13. 2005 Mar;(158):1-199.
PMID: 15853196BACKGROUNDGress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S, Ciaccia D, Ikenberry S, Lehman G. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis: a prospective single center experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Feb;96(2):409-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03551.x.
PMID: 11232683BACKGROUNDDrewes AM, Krarup AL, Detlefsen S, Malmstrom ML, Dimcevski G, Funch-Jensen P. Pain in chronic pancreatitis: the role of neuropathic pain mechanisms. Gut. 2008 Nov;57(11):1616-27. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.146621. Epub 2008 Jun 19.
PMID: 18566105BACKGROUNDGoodman AJ, Gress FG. The endoscopic management of pain in chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:860879. doi: 10.1155/2012/860879. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
PMID: 22550479BACKGROUNDDumonceau JM, Delhaye M, Tringali A, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Poley JW, Arvanitaki M, Costamagna G, Costea F, Deviere J, Eisendrath P, Lakhtakia S, Reddy N, Fockens P, Ponchon T, Bruno M. Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2012 Aug;44(8):784-800. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309840. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
PMID: 22752888BACKGROUNDGress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S, Ikenberry S, Lehman G. A prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided celiac plexus block for managing chronic pancreatitis pain. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;94(4):900-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01042.x.
PMID: 10201454BACKGROUNDKaufman M, Singh G, Das S, Concha-Parra R, Erber J, Micames C, Gress F. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block and celiac plexus neurolysis for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;44(2):127-34. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181bb854d.
PMID: 19826273BACKGROUNDSchneider A, Lohr JM, Singer MV. The M-ANNHEIM classification of chronic pancreatitis: introduction of a unifying classification system based on a review of previous classifications of the disease. J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb;42(2):101-19. doi: 10.1007/s00535-006-1945-4. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
PMID: 17351799BACKGROUNDVaradarajulu S, Eltoum I, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA. Histopathologic correlates of noncalcific chronic pancreatitis by EUS: a prospective tissue characterization study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Sep;66(3):501-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.043. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
PMID: 17640639BACKGROUNDKleykamp M. Unemployment, earnings and enrollment among post 9/11 veterans. Soc Sci Res. 2013 May;42(3):836-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.017. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
PMID: 23521998BACKGROUNDEypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995 Feb;82(2):216-22. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820229.
PMID: 7749697BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Buxbaum, MD
Los Angels County Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2015
First Posted
March 26, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 12, 2018
Study Completion
February 12, 2018
Last Updated
February 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02