NCT00580749

Brief Summary

We will compare the two types of enteral (intestinal) nutrition in regard to patients with severe acute pancreatitis in our institution and also in 8 others in the United States.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 21, 2007

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 27, 2007

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

January 27, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

December 21, 2007

Last Update Submit

January 26, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Pancreatitisenteral feedingdistal jejunal feedingnaso gastric feedingpancreatic rest

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Feeding success as determined by the quantity of nutrition delivered and the number of interruptions due to intolerance and how the two forms of feeding influence disease outcome as measured by duration of ICU and hospital stay.

    Approx. one week

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Feeding tolerance (nitrogen balance, stool volume, incidence of nausea, incidence of nausea and vomiting) will demonstrate better tolerance for subjects undergoing DJ feeding than those undergoing NG feeding.

    Approx. one week

Study Arms (2)

DJ

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Naso disal jejunal(DJ) feedings randomized to 50% of subjects meeting criteria.

Procedure: Naso jejunal feeding tube insertion

NG

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Placement of naso gastric feeding tube through nare into stomach for enteral feeding.

Procedure: NG feeding tube insertion

Interventions

Placement of feeding tube through nare and into jejunum for administration of enteral feeding.

DJ

Placement of naso gastric feeding tube into stomach for purpose of enteral feedings.

NG

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients over the age of 18yr
  • The typical history of abdominal pain for over 24h with raised (\>3-fold) serum pancreatic enzymes on admission
  • Severe pancreatitis, as defined by: the Atlanta classification of severe disease (60), but with important modifications to sharpen the definition of severity, to include one or more of the following:
  • The presence of organ failure (MOF) resistant to early aggressive IV fluid resuscitation as defined by a Marshall score of ≥2 in any one organ (for calculation, see Appendix (61)), excluding the liver component as the abnormality may be due to gall stones rather than the systemic inflammatory response (17)
  • Pancreatic necrosis \>30% on CT scan or a modified CT severity index (CTSI: see Appendix (62)) of ≥8
  • APACHE score ≥ 8 (for calculation, see Appendix (63))
  • Ranson's criteria ≥3 (for calculation, see Appendix (64))

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to absorb enteral nutrients resulting in chronic intestinal failure and need for IV feeding, such as short bowel, malabsorption disorders such as celiac or intestinal proliferative disorders, chronic obstruction and pseudo-obstruction.
  • Time elapse since commencement of acute pancreatitis symptoms \>10 days. In order to take advantage of the 'window of opportunity' to prevent the progression of 'transient' MOF to 'permanent' MOF, patients should be started on enteral feeding as soon as possible. However, in practice many patients present initially with mild disease which progresses to severe necrosis at the end of the first week, and these patients need nutritional support for long periods of time. Consequently, this is an important group to include in this investigation. Post hoc analysis will be performed to see whether they behave differently to patients fed earlier in their disease
  • Any form of artificial feeding since commencement of acute pancreatitis symptoms
  • Patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic insufficiency requiring pancreatic enzyme supplements, based on clinical history and specific investigations such as by ERCP, MRP, or CT scanning.
  • Pre-existing chronic renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, as this will make assessment of severity difficult
  • Pre-existing end-stage liver disease with ascites, coagulopathy and encephalopathy, supported by biopsy, and/or radiological imaging and endoscopy (portal hypertension, varices and gastropathy), as this will make assessment of severity difficult
  • Chronic immunodeficiency states such as AIDS defined by CD-4 count \< 50, and immunoglobulin deficiencies as it may independently affect feeding tolerance and infection risk
  • Pancreatic cancer proven by biopsy, and any other form of cancer with life-expectancy \<6 months.
  • Current somatostatin or corticosteroid therapy as these drugs will impair intestinal, metabolic, and immune function, and therefore affect absorption and infection risk.
  • Contraindication to using the nose for enteral tube insertion
  • Severe traumatic brain injury with ICP\>20mmHg despite treatment
  • Previous completion or withdrawal from this study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

University of Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

University of Florida College of Medicine

Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States

Location

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pancreatic DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • David Whitcomb, MD

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2007

First Posted

December 27, 2007

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

May 1, 2013

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

January 27, 2016

Record last verified: 2013-06

Locations