NCT02399319

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare subcutaneous internal fixation and open plating of the symphysis in patients with a disruption of the symphysis requiring stabilization.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
4

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2014

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 23, 2015

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 26, 2015

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 21, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 21, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

January 25, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

March 23, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 22, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

anterior pelvic ringsymphysis disruption

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Functional Outcomes

    The primary objective is to compare functional outcomes between subcutaneous internal fixation and symphyseal plating as measured by the PROMIS v1.2-Physical Function instrument.

    24 hours - 24 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Compare the health-related quality of life and functional outcome scores

    24 hours - 24 months

Study Arms (4)

Randomized to Internal Fixator

EXPERIMENTAL

Patient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention would be internal fixator.

Procedure: Internal Fixator

Randomized to Symphyseal Plate

EXPERIMENTAL

Patient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention would be internal plating of the symphysis.

Procedure: Symphyseal Plate

Observational - Internal Fixator

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and the treating physician selected the internal fixator intervention based on their opinion of how best to treat the specific case.

Procedure: Internal Fixator

Observational - Symphyseal Plate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and the treating physician selected internal plating of the symphysis based on their opinion of how best to treat the specific case.

Procedure: Symphyseal Plate

Interventions

Internal fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are inserted under the skin, internally.

Observational - Internal FixatorRandomized to Internal Fixator

A plate that spans across the symphysis to maintain reduction and stability.

Observational - Symphyseal PlateRandomized to Symphyseal Plate

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • A symphysis disruption either in the coronal and/or sagittal plane on anterior-posterior , inlet and/or outlet pelvic radiographs
  • Need for anterior pelvic ring stabilization
  • Injury amenable to plating as well as subcutaneous internal fixation per the treating surgeon's opinion
  • Patient was ambulatory prior to sustaining the injury
  • Provision of informed consent by patient or proxy

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a slim build with little subcutaneous fat who cannot be treated with a subcutaneous internal fixator based on the treating surgeon's opinion
  • Patients who are deemed not likely to follow-up (e.g. patients who live more than 50 miles away and patients with no fixed address)
  • Moderately or severely cognitively impaired patients
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

Related Publications (32)

  • Dalal SA, Burgess AR, Siegel JH, Young JW, Brumback RJ, Poka A, Dunham CM, Gens D, Bathon H. Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: classification by mechanism is key to pattern of organ injury, resuscitative requirements, and outcome. J Trauma. 1989 Jul;29(7):981-1000; discussion 1000-2.

    PMID: 2746708BACKGROUND
  • Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Schubeck D, Wang XF. Functional outcomes in women after high-energy pelvic ring injury. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):296-301. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318221e94e.

    PMID: 22337480BACKGROUND
  • Raman R, Roberts CS, Pape HC, Giannoudis PV. Implant retention and removal after internal fixation of the symphysis pubis. Injury. 2005 Jul;36(7):827-31. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.11.012. Epub 2005 Feb 25.

    PMID: 15949483BACKGROUND
  • Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Schubeck D. Pelvic ring injury is associated with sexual dysfunction in women. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):308-13. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821d700e.

    PMID: 22011632BACKGROUND
  • Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Schubeck D. Pregnancy outcomes after pelvic ring injury. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):302-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822428c5.

    PMID: 22048182BACKGROUND
  • Cole PA, Gauger EM, Anavian J, Ly TV, Morgan RA, Heddings AA. Anterior pelvic external fixator versus subcutaneous internal fixator in the treatment of anterior ring pelvic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):269-77. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182410577.

    PMID: 22357081BACKGROUND
  • Gardner MJ, Mehta S, Mirza A, Ricci WM. Anterior pelvic reduction and fixation using a subcutaneous internal fixator. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):314-21. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318220bb22.

    PMID: 22048189BACKGROUND
  • Merriman DJ, Ricci WM, McAndrew CM, Gardner MJ. Is application of an internal anterior pelvic fixator anatomically feasible? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2111-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2287-6.

    PMID: 22383020BACKGROUND
  • Moazzam C, Heddings AA, Moodie P, Cole PA. Anterior pelvic subcutaneous internal fixator application: an anatomic study. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):263-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31823e6b82.

    PMID: 22337488BACKGROUND
  • Vaidya R, Kubiak EN, Bergin PF, Dombroski DG, Critchlow RJ, Sethi A, Starr AJ. Complications of anterior subcutaneous internal fixation for unstable pelvis fractures: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2124-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2233-z.

    PMID: 22219004BACKGROUND
  • Vaidya R, Colen R, Vigdorchik J, Tonnos F, Sethi A. Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with an internal anterior fixator and posterior fixation: initial clinical series. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jan;26(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318233b8a7.

    PMID: 22048183BACKGROUND
  • Majeed SA. External fixation of the injured pelvis. The functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Jul;72(4):612-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2380212.

    PMID: 2380212BACKGROUND
  • Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):344-9. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002088.

    PMID: 11491193BACKGROUND
  • Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.

    PMID: 8628042BACKGROUND
  • PELTIER LF. COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH FRACTURES OF THE PELVIS. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965 Jul;47:1060-9. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14318624BACKGROUND
  • Scaglione M, Parchi P, Digrandi G, Latessa M, Guido G. External fixation in pelvic fractures. Musculoskelet Surg. 2010 Nov;94(2):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s12306-010-0084-5. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

    PMID: 21086087BACKGROUND
  • Pohlemann T, Bosch U, Gansslen A, Tscherne H. The Hannover experience in management of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Aug;(305):69-80.

    PMID: 8050249BACKGROUND
  • Holstein JH, Pizanis A, Kohler D, Pohlemann T; Working Group Quality of Life After Pelvic Fractures. What are predictors for patients' quality of life after pelvic ring fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Sep;471(9):2841-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2840-y.

    PMID: 23408176BACKGROUND
  • Kabak S, Halici M, Tuncel M, Avsarogullari L, Baktir A, Basturk M. Functional outcome of open reduction and internal fixation for completely unstable pelvic ring fractures (type C): a report of 40 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Sep;17(8):555-62. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200309000-00003.

    PMID: 14504576BACKGROUND
  • McCarthy ML, MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Copeland CE, Hash CS, Burgess AR. Functional status following orthopedic trauma in young women. J Trauma. 1995 Nov;39(5):828-36; discussion 836-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199511000-00005.

    PMID: 7473997BACKGROUND
  • Mullis BH, Sagi HC. Minimum 1-year follow-up for patients with vertical shear sacroiliac joint dislocations treated with iliosacral screws: does joint ankylosis or anatomic reduction contribute to functional outcome? J Orthop Trauma. 2008 May-Jun;22(5):293-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816b6b4e.

    PMID: 18448980BACKGROUND
  • Oliver CW, Twaddle B, Agel J, Routt ML Jr. Outcome after pelvic ring fractures: evaluation using the medical outcomes short form SF-36. Injury. 1996 Nov;27(9):635-41. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(96)00100-3.

    PMID: 9039360BACKGROUND
  • Suzuki T, Shindo M, Soma K, Minehara H, Nakamura K, Uchino M, Itoman M. Long-term functional outcome after unstable pelvic ring fracture. J Trauma. 2007 Oct;63(4):884-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000235888.90489.fc.

    PMID: 18090021BACKGROUND
  • Matta JM. Indications for anterior fixation of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):88-96. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00011.

    PMID: 8769439BACKGROUND
  • Matta JM, Saucedo T. Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 May;(242):83-97.

    PMID: 2706863BACKGROUND
  • Pohlemann T, Gansslen A, Schellwald O, Culemann U, Tscherne H. Outcome after pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 1996;27 Suppl 2:B31-8.

    PMID: 8915200BACKGROUND
  • Tornetta P 3rd, Dickson K, Matta JM. Outcome of rotationally unstable pelvic ring injuries treated operatively. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):147-51. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00018.

    PMID: 8769446BACKGROUND
  • Tornetta P 3rd, Matta JM. Outcome of operatively treated unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):186-93. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00022.

    PMID: 8769450BACKGROUND
  • Lefaivre KA, Slobogean GP, Valeriote J, O'Brien PJ, Macadam SA. Reporting and interpretation of the functional outcomes after the surgical treatment of disruptions of the pelvic ring: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Apr;94(4):549-55. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B4.27960.

    PMID: 22434474BACKGROUND
  • Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Mar;71(2):304-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B2.2925751.

    PMID: 2925751BACKGROUND
  • Lefaivre KA, Slobogean GP, Ngai JT, Broekhuyse HM, O'Brien PJ. What outcomes are important for patients after pelvic trauma? Subjective responses and psychometric analysis of three published pelvic-specific outcome instruments. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jan;28(1):23-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182945fe9.

    PMID: 23571293BACKGROUND
  • Sprague S, Leece P, Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski MF; S.P.R.I.N.T. Investigators. Limiting loss to follow-up in a multicenter randomized trial in orthopedic surgery. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Dec;24(6):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.012.

    PMID: 14662277BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Internal Fixators

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostheses and ImplantsEquipment and SuppliesOrthopedic Fixation DevicesOrthopedic EquipmentSurgical EquipmentSurgical Fixation Devices

Study Officials

  • Michael Zlowodzki, MD

    Indiana University Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2015

First Posted

March 26, 2015

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion

July 21, 2016

Study Completion

July 21, 2016

Last Updated

January 25, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-07

Locations