Study Stopped
Principle Investigator left institution
Comparison of Subcutaneous INFIX and EXFIX for Anterior Pelvic Ring Fractures Requiring Stabilization
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Subcutaneous Internal Fixation and External Fixation for Anterior Pelvic Ring Fractures Requiring Stabilization
1 other identifier
interventional
4
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research is to compare patient outcomes of two treatment methods that are currently used as standard of care to treat anterior pelvic ring injuries that require stabilization. The two treatment methods are subcutaneous internal fixation (INFIX) and external fixation (EXFIX). Patients will be given the opportunity to opt out of randomization and participate in one of the observational arms. The first observational arm is comprised of those patients who do not want to randomize and they will undergo anterior pelvic ring stabilization according to the treating surgeon's discretion. The second observational arm will be comprised of patients who consent to be in the study but whose pelvic ring fractures do not require any form of anterior pelvic internal fixation based on the treating surgeon's opinion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 19, 2017
CompletedMarch 13, 2018
February 1, 2018
2.2 years
March 23, 2015
August 11, 2017
February 13, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Functional Outcomes (PROMIS v1.2-Physical Function Instrument)
The primary objective is to compare functional outcomes between subcutaneous internal fixation and external fixation as measured by the PROMIS v1.2-Physical Function instrument.
24 hrs - 24 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Implant Breakage or Failure Rates
24 hours - 24 months
Infection Rates
24 hours - 24 months
Revision Surgery Rates
24 hours - 24 months
Health-related Qualify of Life
24 hours - 24 months
Predictors of Outcome (Factors Such as Age, Gender, BMI, Additional Injuries)
24 hours - 24 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Randomized to Internal Fixator
EXPERIMENTALPatient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention will be internal fixator.
Randomized to External Fixator
EXPERIMENTALPatient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention will be external fixator.
Observational - Internal Fixator
OTHERPatient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and either the treating physician selected the internal fixator intervention based on their preference for the specific case or the patient chose the internal fixator.
Observational - External Fixator
OTHERPatient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and either the treating physician selected the external fixator intervention based on their preference for the specific case or the patient chose the external fixator.
Interventions
Internal fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are inserted under the skin, internally.
External fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are outside of the body.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- One or more fractures of the anterior pelvic ring (pubic rami)
- Need for anterior pelvic ring stabilization
- Injury amenable to external as well as subcutaneous internal fixation per the treating surgeon's opinion
- Patient was ambulatory prior to sustaining the injury
- Provision of informed consent by patient or proxy
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a slim build with little subcutaneous fat who cannot be treated with a subcutaneous internal fixator based on the treating surgeon's opinion
- Patients who are deemed not likely to follow-up (e.g. patients who live more than 50 miles away and patients with no fixed address)
- Moderately or severely cognitively impaired patients
- Pregnant women
- Prisoners
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Related Publications (31)
Arazi M, Kutlu A, Mutlu M, Yel M, Kapiciglu MI. The pelvic external fixation: the mid-term results of 41 patients treated with a newly designed fixator. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(10):584-6. doi: 10.1007/s004020000142.
PMID: 11110141BACKGROUNDGansslen A, Pohlemann T, Krettek C. [A simple supraacetabular external fixation for pelvic ring fractures]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2005 Sep;17(3):296-312. doi: 10.1007/s00064-005-1134-2. German.
PMID: 16132252BACKGROUNDHupel TM, McKee MD, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Primary external fixation of rotationally unstable pelvic fractures in obese patients. J Trauma. 1998 Jul;45(1):111-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199807000-00024.
PMID: 9680022BACKGROUNDLindahl J, Hirvensalo E, Bostman O, Santavirta S. Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of injuries of the pelvic ring. Long-term evaluation of 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Nov;81(6):955-62. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b6.8571.
PMID: 10615965BACKGROUNDMajeed SA. External fixation of the injured pelvis. The functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Jul;72(4):612-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2380212.
PMID: 2380212BACKGROUNDMears DC, Fu FH. Modern concepts of external skeletal fixation of the pelvis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Sep;(151):65-72.
PMID: 7418325BACKGROUNDTucker MC, Nork SE, Simonian PT, Routt ML Jr. Simple anterior pelvic external fixation. J Trauma. 2000 Dec;49(6):989-94. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200012000-00002.
PMID: 11130512BACKGROUNDMajeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Mar;71(2):304-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B2.2925751.
PMID: 2925751BACKGROUNDRiemer BL, Butterfield SL, Diamond DL, Young JC, Raves JJ, Cottington E, Kislan K. Acute mortality associated with injuries to the pelvic ring: the role of early patient mobilization and external fixation. J Trauma. 1993 Nov;35(5):671-5; discussion 676-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199311000-00003.
PMID: 8230327BACKGROUNDWild JJ Jr, Hanson GW, Tullos HS. Unstable fractures of the pelvis treated by external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Sep;64(7):1010-20.
PMID: 7118964BACKGROUNDCole PA, Gauger EM, Anavian J, Ly TV, Morgan RA, Heddings AA. Anterior pelvic external fixator versus subcutaneous internal fixator in the treatment of anterior ring pelvic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):269-77. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182410577.
PMID: 22357081BACKGROUNDGardner MJ, Mehta S, Mirza A, Ricci WM. Anterior pelvic reduction and fixation using a subcutaneous internal fixator. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):314-21. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318220bb22.
PMID: 22048189BACKGROUNDMerriman DJ, Ricci WM, McAndrew CM, Gardner MJ. Is application of an internal anterior pelvic fixator anatomically feasible? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2111-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2287-6.
PMID: 22383020BACKGROUNDMoazzam C, Heddings AA, Moodie P, Cole PA. Anterior pelvic subcutaneous internal fixator application: an anatomic study. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):263-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31823e6b82.
PMID: 22337488BACKGROUNDVaidya R, Colen R, Vigdorchik J, Tonnos F, Sethi A. Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with an internal anterior fixator and posterior fixation: initial clinical series. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jan;26(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318233b8a7.
PMID: 22048183BACKGROUNDVaidya R, Kubiak EN, Bergin PF, Dombroski DG, Critchlow RJ, Sethi A, Starr AJ. Complications of anterior subcutaneous internal fixation for unstable pelvis fractures: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2124-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2233-z.
PMID: 22219004BACKGROUNDDrummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):344-9. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002088.
PMID: 11491193BACKGROUNDWare J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
PMID: 8628042BACKGROUNDPELTIER LF. COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH FRACTURES OF THE PELVIS. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965 Jul;47:1060-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 14318624BACKGROUNDScaglione M, Parchi P, Digrandi G, Latessa M, Guido G. External fixation in pelvic fractures. Musculoskelet Surg. 2010 Nov;94(2):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s12306-010-0084-5. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
PMID: 21086087BACKGROUNDPohlemann T, Bosch U, Gansslen A, Tscherne H. The Hannover experience in management of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Aug;(305):69-80.
PMID: 8050249BACKGROUNDHolstein JH, Pizanis A, Kohler D, Pohlemann T; Working Group Quality of Life After Pelvic Fractures. What are predictors for patients' quality of life after pelvic ring fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Sep;471(9):2841-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2840-y.
PMID: 23408176BACKGROUNDKabak S, Halici M, Tuncel M, Avsarogullari L, Baktir A, Basturk M. Functional outcome of open reduction and internal fixation for completely unstable pelvic ring fractures (type C): a report of 40 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Sep;17(8):555-62. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200309000-00003.
PMID: 14504576BACKGROUNDMcCarthy ML, MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Copeland CE, Hash CS, Burgess AR. Functional status following orthopedic trauma in young women. J Trauma. 1995 Nov;39(5):828-36; discussion 836-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199511000-00005.
PMID: 7473997BACKGROUNDMullis BH, Sagi HC. Minimum 1-year follow-up for patients with vertical shear sacroiliac joint dislocations treated with iliosacral screws: does joint ankylosis or anatomic reduction contribute to functional outcome? J Orthop Trauma. 2008 May-Jun;22(5):293-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816b6b4e.
PMID: 18448980BACKGROUNDOliver CW, Twaddle B, Agel J, Routt ML Jr. Outcome after pelvic ring fractures: evaluation using the medical outcomes short form SF-36. Injury. 1996 Nov;27(9):635-41. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(96)00100-3.
PMID: 9039360BACKGROUNDSuzuki T, Shindo M, Soma K, Minehara H, Nakamura K, Uchino M, Itoman M. Long-term functional outcome after unstable pelvic ring fracture. J Trauma. 2007 Oct;63(4):884-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000235888.90489.fc.
PMID: 18090021BACKGROUNDVallier HA, Cureton BA, Schubeck D, Wang XF. Functional outcomes in women after high-energy pelvic ring injury. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):296-301. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318221e94e.
PMID: 22337480BACKGROUNDLefaivre KA, Slobogean GP, Valeriote J, O'Brien PJ, Macadam SA. Reporting and interpretation of the functional outcomes after the surgical treatment of disruptions of the pelvic ring: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Apr;94(4):549-55. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B4.27960.
PMID: 22434474BACKGROUNDLefaivre KA, Slobogean GP, Ngai JT, Broekhuyse HM, O'Brien PJ. What outcomes are important for patients after pelvic trauma? Subjective responses and psychometric analysis of three published pelvic-specific outcome instruments. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jan;28(1):23-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182945fe9.
PMID: 23571293BACKGROUNDSprague S, Leece P, Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski MF; S.P.R.I.N.T. Investigators. Limiting loss to follow-up in a multicenter randomized trial in orthopedic surgery. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Dec;24(6):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.012.
PMID: 14662277BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Krista Brown, Clinical Research Coordinator
- Organization
- Indiana University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Zlowodzki, MD
Indiana University Health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2015
First Posted
March 31, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 13, 2018
Results First Posted
December 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2018-02