Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Posterior Restorations: Amalgam vs Resin Composite
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: This 3-year clinical trial compared the performance and post-operative sensitivity of a posterior resin composite with that of bonded-amalgam in large sized cavities. Additionally, it was evaluated whether resin composite could be an alternative for bonded amalgam. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial. Patients in need of at least two posterior restorations were recruited. Authors randomly assigned one half of the restorations to receive bonded-amalgam and the other half to composite restorations. Forty bonded-amalgams and composites were evaluated for their performance on modified Ryge criteria and post-operative sensitivity using VAS for 36-months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2015
CompletedMarch 20, 2015
March 1, 2015
3 years
March 10, 2015
March 16, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Modified Ryge Criteria
3 years
Study Arms (1)
Active comparator
EXPERIMENTALposterior restorations
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be included, the teeth to be restored had to:
- be asymptomatic
- have occlusal and adjacent teeth in contact
- have cavity sizes exceeding the one-third of the bucco-lingual distance between cusp tips -
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with periodontitis, poor oral hygiene, bruxism or a history of allergic reactions to any of the materials
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ege Universitylead
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2015
First Posted
March 20, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 20, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03