Safety and Efficacy Study of Lusutrombopag for Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease Undergoing Elective Invasive Procedures
L-PLUS 2
A Phase 3 Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of S-888711 (Lusutrombopag) for the Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease Undergoing Elective Invasive Procedures (L-PLUS 2)
2 other identifiers
interventional
215
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of lusutrombopag with placebo for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease who are undergoing elective invasive procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 5, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 19, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 25, 2018
CompletedOctober 30, 2018
October 1, 2018
1.8 years
March 10, 2015
August 27, 2018
October 1, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Who Required No Platelet Transfusion Prior to the Primary Invasive Procedure and No Rescue Therapy For Bleeding From Randomization Through 7 Days After the Primary Elective Procedure
Participants were considered as meeting the primary endpoint if all of the following conditions were satisfied: * Required no platelet transfusion from the date of randomization through at least 7 days after the primary invasive procedure * Did not receive the following rescue therapy for bleeding from the date of randomization through 7 days after the primary invasive procedure * Platelet preparations * Other blood preparations, including red blood cells and plasma * Volume expanders * Underwent an invasive procedure. Participants who received at least one platelet transfusion prior to the primary invasive procedure, received at least one rescue therapy for bleeding from the date of randomization through 7 days after the primary invasive procedure, discontinued from the study before undergoing the primary invasive procedure, or did not undergo an invasive procedure were considered as not meeting the primary endpoint.
From Randomization to 7 days after the invasive procedure, up to approximately 21 days.
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Percentage of Participants Who Required no Platelet Transfusion During the Study
From Day 1 to end of the posttreatment period, 35 days.
Percentage of Participants With a Response
From Day 1 to the end of the posttreatment period, 35 days.
Duration of Increase in Platelet Count to ≥ 50 × 10⁹/L
From Day 1 to the end of the posttreatment period, 35 days.
Duration of Increase in Platelet Count to ≥ 50 × 10⁹/L by Platelet Transfusion Status
From Day 1 to the end of the posttreatment period, 35 days.
Percentage of Participants Who Required Rescue Therapy for Bleeding During the Study
From Day 1 to the end of the possttreatment period, 35 days.
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lusutrombopag
EXPERIMENTALLusutrombopag 3 mg once daily for up to 7 days.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo once daily for up to 7 days.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to understand the study and comply with all study procedures.
- Willing to provide written informed consent prior to Screening.
- Male or female.
- years of age or older at the time of signing informed consent.
- Platelet count \< 50 × 10\^9/L at baseline on Day 1 prior to randomization.
- Undergoing an elective invasive procedure.
- In the opinion of the investigator, able to meet study requirements.
- Male patients who are sterile or who agree to use an appropriate method of contraception (including use of a condom with spermicide) from Screening to completion of the Post-treatment Period.
- Female patients who are not postmenopausal or surgically sterile need to agree to use a highly effective contraception (including contraceptive implant, injectable contraceptive, combination hormonal contraceptive \[including vaginal rings\], intrauterine contraceptive device or vasectomised partner) from Screening to completion of the Post-treatment Period. Barrier method with or without spermicide, double barrier contraception and oral contraceptive pill are insufficient methods on their own.
You may not qualify if:
- Any of the following diseases:
- hematopoietic tumor
- aplastic anemia
- myelodysplastic syndrome
- myelofibrosis
- congenital thrombocytopenia
- drug-induced thrombocytopenia
- generalized infection requiring treatment except for viral liver disease
- immune thrombocytopenia.
- History of splenectomy.
- History of liver transplantation.
- Any of the following at Screening:
- hepatic encephalopathy uncontrolled by drugs
- ascites uncontrolled by drugs.
- Portal vein tumor embolism.
- +23 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shionogilead
Related Publications (2)
Flamm SL, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Fukuhara T, Bentley R, Katsube T, Ochiai T, Kano T, Tsukimura E, Sasaki R, Osaki Y. Pharmacokinetic Assessment and Treatment Effect of Lusutrombopag in Child-Pugh Class C Patients: Review of Patient Data from Two Clinical Studies and Post-Marketing Surveillance. Adv Ther. 2022 Sep;39(9):4285-4298. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02237-8. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
PMID: 35904722DERIVEDAlkhouri N, Imawari M, Izumi N, Osaki Y, Ochiai T, Kano T, Bentley R, Trevisani F. Lusutrombopag Is Safe and Efficacious for Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Patients With and Without Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;18(11):2600-2608.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.032. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
PMID: 32205226DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Shionogi Clinical Trials Administrator
- Organization
- Shionogi Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Shionogi Clinical Trials Administrator Clinical Support Help Line
Shionogi
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2015
First Posted
March 17, 2015
Study Start
June 15, 2015
Primary Completion
April 5, 2017
Study Completion
April 19, 2017
Last Updated
October 30, 2018
Results First Posted
September 25, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10