Ghana PrenaBelt Trial: A Positional Therapy Device to Reduce Still-Birth
A Maternal Device to Reduce the Risk of Stillbirth and Low Birth-Weight
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Every day in Ghana, 47 babies are stillborn (SB) and 232 babies are born with low birth-weight (LBW) - many of whom will die in infancy or suffer lifelong consequences. Sleeping on the back during pregnancy has recently emerged in scientific literature as a potential risk factor for SB and LBW. In fact, one of the earliest studies to demonstrate this link was conducted in Ghana by investigators on this protocol. When a woman in mid-to-late-pregnancy lies on her back, her large uterus compresses one of the major veins that delivers blood back to her heart and may completely obstruct it. This may result in less blood being returned to her heart and less blood being pumped to her developing fetus. Such changes may negatively impact the growth of her fetus and, along with some other risk factors, may contribute to the death of her baby. The investigators have developed a device, 'PrenaBelt', to significantly reduce the amount of time a pregnant woman spends sleeping on her back. The PrenaBelt functions via a simple, safe, effective, and well-established modality called positional therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the PrenaBelt on birth-weight and assess the feasibility of introducing it to Ghanaian third-trimester pregnant women in their home setting via an antenatal care clinic and local health-care staff. Data from this study will be used in effect size calculations for the design of a large-scale, epidemiological study targeted at reducing LBW and SB in Ghana and globally.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 2, 2020
CompletedApril 2, 2020
March 1, 2020
9 months
February 18, 2015
June 6, 2018
March 19, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Birthweight of Baby
Birthweight was measured using a Detecto newborn scale (Webb City, USA) and documented in the participant's hospital folder immediately after delivery by a midwife who was not a part of the study team and was not aware of the treatment allocation. Birthweight was subsequently abstracted by the blinded outcomes assessor. Analysis was by original assigned groups and on a complete-case basis (drop-outs excluded). The newborns included in the final analysis were born from November 31, 2015 through May 13, 2016.
At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Birthweight Centile
Birthweight centile was calculated using the Gestation-Related Optimal Weight (GROW) software,(1,2) which accounts for the main non-pathological factors affecting birthweight (gestational age, maternal height, maternal weight at booking, parity, ethnicity, and sex of the neonate) and, as such, enables delineation between constitutional and pathological smallness and more accurate detection of pregnancies at increased risk for adverse outcomes.(3,4) This was an additional trial outcome specified after trial commencement. 1. Gardosi J, Francis A. Customized Weight Centile Calculator. Gestation Network; 2016. Available from: www.gestation.net 2. Gardosi J, et al. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet. Elsevier; 1992 Feb;339(8788):283-7. 3. Gardosi J. Horm Res. 2006;65(SUPPL. 3):15-8. 4. Odibo A O, et al. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2011 Mar 10; 24(3):411-7.
At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Gestational Age at Delivery
At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Mode of Delivery
At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Sex of Newborn (Male/Female)
At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Stillbirth
At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
Low Birthweight
At delivery of baby (on average, 38 - 40 weeks gestation)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (24)
Medical Staff Questionnaire - Session Time Requirement
From first Introduction and Instruction for PrenaBelt session until the last session (approximately 7 months)
Medical Staff Questionnaire - Session Delivery
From first Introduction and Instruction for PrenaBelt session until the last session (approximately 7 months)
Medical Staff Questionnaire - Session Difficulties
From first Introduction and Instruction for PrenaBelt session until the last session (approximately 7 months)
- +21 more other outcomes
Study Arms (4)
PrenaBelt
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be instructed to use the PrenaBelt nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care. Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery.
PrenaBelt with Body Position Sensor
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be instructed to use the PrenaBelt (with integrated body position sensor (BPS)) nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care. The BPS will be securely integrated into a small pocket on the PrenaBelt. The BPS is not expected to affect body position or sleep. Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery.
Control
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants will be instructed to use the sham-PrenaBelt nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care. Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery.
Control with Body Position Sensor (BPS)
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants will be instructed to use the sham-PrenaBelt (with integrated BPS) nightly for the remainder of their pregnancy in addition to receiving the local standard of care. The BPS will be securely integrated into a small pocket on the sham-PrenaBelt. The BPS is not expected to affect body position or sleep. Participants will be followed by study personnel through the remainder of pregnancy and delivery.
Interventions
The PrenaBelt (PB) is a belt-like, positional therapy (PT) device designed for pregnant women. While the PB does not prevent the user from lying on her back during sleep, it is expected to significantly decrease the amount of time a user spends supine via the mechanism of PT. PT is a simple, non-invasive, inexpensive, long-established, safe, and effective intervention for preventing people with positional-dependent snoring or obstructive sleep apnea from sleeping on their back - a position that exacerbates their condition. The PB is worn at the level of the waist or thorax. By design, the PB affects subtle pressure points on the user's back while supine, activating her body's natural mechanism to reposition itself to relieve discomfort, thereby reducing the amount of time spent supine.
The Body Position Sensor (BPS) is for research purposes only. The BPS can be securely integrated into a pocket on the PrenaBelt (PrenaBelt with BPS Arm) or sham-PrenaBelt (Control with BPS Arm). The BPS is a small, electronic data acquisition device. The BPS uses a three axes accelerometer to detect orientation of the PrenaBelt, and thus the user (right, left, prone, supine), in three-dimensional space. The accelerometer data is collected continually with time stamping and stored on the BPS hard drive and can be accessed via connecting it to a computer. The BPS is not expected to affect the body position of the user.
The PrenaBelt can be easily converted into a sham-PrenaBelt for research purposes by removing the hard balls from its pockets or exchanging these hard balls for soft balls so it cannot provide pressure points, i.e., positional therapy function. The sham-PrenaBelt looks, fits, and feels like the PrenaBelt but cannot provide positional therapy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥18 years old
- low-risk singleton pregnancy
- entering the last trimester of pregnancy (in range 26-30 weeks of gestation)
- residing in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area or area served by the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
- fluent in either English, Twi, or Ga.
You may not qualify if:
- BMI ≥ 35 at booking (first antenatal appointment for current pregnancy)
- pregnancy complicated by obstetric complications (hypertension \[pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension\], diabetes \[gestational or not\], or intra-uterine growth restriction \[\<10th %ile for growth\])
- sleep complicated by medical conditions (known to get \<4 hours of sleep per night due to insomnia, or musculoskeletal disorder that prevents sleeping on a certain side \[e.g., arthritic shoulder\])
- multiple pregnancy
- known fetal abnormality
- maternal age \>35
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Allan Kemberlead
- Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghanacollaborator
- Grand Challenges Canadacollaborator
- Innovative Canadians for Changecollaborator
- Global Innovations for Reproductive Health and Lifecollaborator
- Kaishin Chu Designcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
Accra, Greater Accra Region, Ghana
Related Publications (8)
Owusu JT, Anderson FJ, Coleman J, Oppong S, Seffah JD, Aikins A, O'Brien LM. Association of maternal sleep practices with pre-eclampsia, low birth weight, and stillbirth among Ghanaian women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Jun;121(3):261-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.01.013. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
PMID: 23507553BACKGROUNDStacey T, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA, Ekeroma AJ, Zuccollo JM, McCowan LM. Association between maternal sleep practices and risk of late stillbirth: a case-control study. BMJ. 2011 Jun 14;342:d3403. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3403.
PMID: 21673002BACKGROUNDGordon A, Raynes-Greenow C, Bond D, Morris J, Rawlinson W, Jeffery H. Sleep position, fetal growth restriction, and late-pregnancy stillbirth: the Sydney stillbirth study. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;125(2):347-355. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000627.
PMID: 25568999BACKGROUNDPlatts J, Mitchell EA, Stacey T, Martin BL, Roberts D, McCowan L, Heazell AE. The Midland and North of England Stillbirth Study (MiNESS). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 May 21;14:171. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-171.
PMID: 24885461BACKGROUNDWarland J, Mitchell EA. A triple risk model for unexplained late stillbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Apr 14;14:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-142.
PMID: 24731396BACKGROUNDO'Brien LM, Warland J. Typical sleep positions in pregnant women. Early Hum Dev. 2014 Jun;90(6):315-7. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
PMID: 24661447BACKGROUNDColeman J, Grewal S, Warland J, Hobson S, Liu K, Kember A. Maternal positional therapy for fetal growth and customised birth weight centile benefit in a Bayesian reanalysis of a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 28;14(4):e078315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078315.
PMID: 38684260DERIVEDColeman J, Okere M, Seffah J, Kember A, O'Brien LM, Borazjani A, Butler M, Wells J, MacRitchie S, Isaac A, Chu K, Scott H. The Ghana PrenaBelt trial: a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effect of maternal positional therapy during third-trimester sleep on birth weight. BMJ Open. 2019 May 1;9(4):e022981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022981.
PMID: 31048420DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Did not include a non-intervention control group. Determination of adherence to device use was largely subjective, relying mostly on participants' self-reports. Low adherence rates. May be under-powered to detect a clinically meaningful difference.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Allan Kember, Director of Programs
- Organization
- Global Innovations for Reproductive Health & Life
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Heather M Scott, MD FRCSC
The IWK Health Centre
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jerry Coleman, MB ChB FWACS
Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2015
First Posted
March 5, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 2, 2020
Results First Posted
April 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03