Tibial Tunnel Placement for ACL Reconstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although extensive research has been carried out on Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel placement, very little attention has been given to the tibial tunnel. Researchers have suggested that the tibial tunnel be placed in the center of the ACL footprint, which they described as being approximately 43% of the way (anterior-to-posterior) across the proximal tibia at its widest extent. However, others have suggested that a more anterior placement may yield improved biomechanical and clinical results. The center of the ACL footprint and the posterior aspect of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus does not yield tibial tunnel placement a consistent percentage of the way across the tibial plateau; therefore, guidelines should be based on intraoperative fluoroscopic measurements. However, the question remaining is what percentage of the anterior-to-posterior distance across the tibia is the ideal location for the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction. This study will help answer that question. Patients with a diagnosed rupture of the ACL who are scheduled for surgical reconstruction will be considered for enrollment. Eligible patients will be allocated to one of two groups based on the location of the tibial tunnel (anterior vs. posterior) during the surgical procedure. In addition to a baseline (pre-operative) evaluation, participants will return for follow-up visits at 6, 12, and 24 months post-surgery. Follow up will be completed at 24 months. The primary objective of this study is to collect subjective and objective measures of knee-related function in patients with an anterior vs. posterior placed tibial tunnel through 24 months postoperative care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2019
CompletedMay 13, 2025
May 1, 2025
4 years
February 18, 2015
May 7, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Joint Evaluation
Subjective knee-specific function
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Knee Injury Outcome and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS)
24 months
Marx Activity Rating Scale
24 months
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
24 months
Quadriceps Strength
24 months
Gait Analysis
24 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Knee Joint Range of Motion
24 months
Thigh Circumference
24 months
X-Ray (AP, lateral views)
24 months
Study Arms (2)
ACL Reconstruction: Anterior Tunnel
EXPERIMENTALDuring surgery prior to ACL reconstruction, a line will be measured to indicate 35% of the anterior-to-posterior (front to back) distance of the proximal tibia. The tibial tunnel will be placed anterior (in front) of the 35% line.
ACL Reconstruction: Posterior Tunnel
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring surgery prior to ACL reconstruction, a line will be measured to indicate 35% of the anterior-to-posterior (front to back) distance of the proximal tibia. The tibial tunnel will be placed posterior (in back) of the 35% line.
Interventions
ACL reconstruction with anterior tibial tunnel placement in reference to a point measuring 35% of the anterior-posterior distance of the proximal tibia.
ACL reconstruction with posterior tibial tunnel placement in reference to a point measuring 35% of the anterior-posterior distance of the proximal tibia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age at time of randomization: 16 - 50 years (skeletally mature)
- Primary, uncomplicated ACL reconstruction
- Autograft (STG or BPTB)
You may not qualify if:
- Multiple ligament knee injury (full thickness)
- Revision ACL reconstruction
- ACL reconstruction with allograft
- Meniscectomy \> 75%
- Treatable articular cartilage lesions
- Diagnosis of tibiofemoral or patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Kellgren Lawrence grade \> II)
- Valgus alignment on long-leg cassette (weight bearing line outside of joint center)
- Prior surgery in the ankles, knees, or hips
- Clinical evidence of hip disease
- Patellofemoral joint instability
- Significant patellar or tibiofemoral mal-alignment
- BMI \> 35
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Known connective tissue disorder (e.g. Ehlers-Danlos)
- Peripheral neuropathy
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Virginialead
- University of Kentuckycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Virginia, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
Related Publications (3)
Staubli HU, Rauschning W. Tibial attachment area of the anterior cruciate ligament in the extended knee position. Anatomy and cryosections in vitro complemented by magnetic resonance arthrography in vivo. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2(3):138-46. doi: 10.1007/BF01467915.
PMID: 7584195RESULTBedi A, Maak T, Musahl V, Citak M, O'Loughlin PF, Choi D, Pearle AD. Effect of tibial tunnel position on stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the tibial tunnel position most important? Am J Sports Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):366-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546510388157. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
PMID: 21173195RESULTHatayama K, Terauchi M, Saito K, Higuchi H, Yanagisawa S, Takagishi K. The importance of tibial tunnel placement in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):1072-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
PMID: 23571132RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark D Miller, M.D.
University of Virginia
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Joseph M Hart, Ph.D.
University of Virginia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2015
First Posted
March 2, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2019
Study Completion
April 1, 2019
Last Updated
May 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05